Can’t wait for Our NEW PRESIDENT ROMNEY :) [ Editado ]

[raspberryphoque]

WANTED: “American” Presidential Leader. MUST be Patriotic & have Love of God & Country (I DO mean The U.S.), will NEVER Apologize or Bow down to others, WILL Uphold & Defend The Constitution, Believes in Free Enterprise & understands OVER Regulating kills ALL private sector job growth, knows LESS Government is MORE, realizes it is NOT the Governments job to pick Winners & Losers in the private sector, understands you CANNOT spend your way into prosperity OR tax it on the backs of Americans, will NOT give Amnesty to ANY who cheats & take cuts in front of the line INSTEAD of filing proper paperwork JUST to garner Votes, will NOT enable Americans by making them weak & dependent on the Government through FREEBIES instead of strong & self reliant as Americans have ALWAYS been & understands the difference between a hand up and hand out, will protect our Country from Terrorism (abroad & domestic), will defend & Protect our Borders, and is proficient in Math in order to understand balancing the budget and reducing debt. Narcissists, Dictators and Crybaby Community Organizers need NOT apply,  to be filled in November. Can’t wait for Our NEW PRESIDENT ROMNEY

[siboneyes]

Vice President Marco  Rubio?  

Stephen F. Hayes

May 6, 2012

Senator Marco Rubio appeared on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace this weekend and gave viewers a  clear understanding why many  conservatives see him as a strong candidate  to be Mitt Romney’s running mate.  Rubio answered Wallace’s questions  directly and forcefully, drawing sharp  contrasts between Obama’s record  and the Republican vision for the next four  years.

Part of what makes Rubio so effective, beyond his  obvious  grasp of the substance of the policies being discussed, is the  tone he uses to  criticize the Obama administration. It’s not so much  anger, though some anger might be warranted, but disappointment. So when  Rubio talks about Obama’s failings on the economy, he reminds viewers of  the promises Obama made – to  revive the economy and restore the faith of  Americans in their government – and  laments the president’s inability to  deliver. He did the same thing when asked  for his reaction to the Obama  administration’s use of the death of Osama bin  Laden.

“Let me focus on this issue of bin Laden for a moment. That  was a very proud day for all Americans. Our Armed Forces did a phenomenal job  and the president made an important and wise decision – and he has gotten his  due credit, and rightfully so, for making that decision. But now he’s taken if  further. He has taken something that should unite the American people – a moment  of pride for our country – and instead turned it into a weapon of political  warfare. And I think that’s wrong. I really do. I think it’s wrong for the  president and for the vice president to take this issue and use it for  politics.”

Rubio then used his disappointment to make a larger  point  about Obama, one that speaks directly to the segment of the  electorate who  invested in their hopes in Obama and have been let  down.

“And it goes back to the point I tried to make earlier:  When  this president ran for office in 2008, he said he was going to be  different.

[siboneyes]

part 2

He  was going to be a post-partisan uniter, to bring  Americans together. And three  and a half years later, the president, quite  frankly, has become just like  anyone else in Washington, D.C. And in his  obsessive effort to win his  reelection, he has lost himself and he has  lost what makes him different. And  this issue of they’ve used the bin  Laden raid is one example about how this  administration is just like  everybody else.”

It’s an argument that won’t appeal to the 30-something  percent  of the electorate who will vote for Obama under any circumstances  and are now  spending their time explaining and excusing his failures. But  Obama won because  he inspired millions of new voters to invest their faith  in him and persuaded  others to support his cause. It’s those voters who  will be so important this  time around – and their decisions about whether  to back him again, to stay home  or to support Romney, will go a long way  to determining who wins the  election.

Rubio spoke to them Sunday morning—and, if Mitt Romney  was  watching, it’s hard to believe he didn’t see the potential of having  Rubio as a  full-time spokesman on his behalf this  fall.

That is what much of the current speculation about   Rubio-as-running mate misses. It’s been largely a focus on geography and   ethnicity – a steady stream of musing about his ability (or alleged  inability)  to move Hispanic voters to the Romney column and theorizing  about whether the  mere presence of his name would win Florida for Romney.  The whole thing has a  static quality about it as if what Rubio actually  did on the ticket was somehow  secondary.

It’s not. And the strongest argument for Rubio’s  inclusion on  the ticket, in spite of concerns about his age, relative  inexperience, and a  challenging friend, is how Rubio would actually perform as a candidate. The quality of his appearance on Fox News Sunday is the rule,  not the  exception. On the stump, he usually speaks without notes and in  thirty minutes,  with seemingly little effort, can transform a room of  sleepy senior citizens  into a raucous crowd of would-be reformers ready to  put up yard signs until  Election Day. Beyond that, imagine a television ad  in which running mate Rubio  speaks directly to the camera and tells the  story of his upbringing, of his  mother working as a maid and his father as  a bartender so that their children  might have opportunities that they did  not. In Rubio’s telling, it’s both  exceptional and typical – a moving tale  of family sacrifice that will be  familiar to so many across the  country.

There are reasons that Romney might want another running  mate  and reasons Rubio might prefer to remain in the Senate. But if Romney  decides to  ask Rubio to be considered and eventually to run with him, I  suspect it’ll have  much less to do with Rubio’s name and his native state  than it will with what  Rubio would do as a running mate and vice  president.

[siboneyes]

CHRIS WALLACE  INTERVIEW MARCO RUBIO ON  FOX 5/6/2012

Marco  Rubio on FOX News Sunday - Grand Slam!!! (Vanity) May  6, 2012

Marco Rubio was on  "FOX News Sunday With Chris Wallace" today. OMG, the dude was AWESOME!!! He did  not miss a step; sharp, sensible, intelligent answers to every question. I was  amazed at how smart this guy is. Don't know for sure, but, you might be able to  see the interview on FOX.

[siboneyes]

OBAMA, THE BLACK PANTHERS AND THE CALL  FOR WHITE GENOCIDE

AQUI LOS UNICOS QUE PLANEAN   UNA   REVOLUCION RACIAL SON LOS SICARIOS DE OBAMA, LOS   BLACK   PANTHERS!!!





OBAMA ATIZANDO LA GUERRA DE  CLASE  Y  EL  ODIO RACIAL EN UN RALLY DE LAS PANTERAS   NEGRAS

New Black Panther's  Cracker   Killer's  latest training video...cute! 

EXTERMINATE WHITE    PEOPLE!!!

[sirjohn]

Obama’s  Manger: What if Kenya’s a Little Town in Hawaii?

Townhall.com ^ | May 20, 2012 | Doug  Giles

Who the heck was Obama getting to hawk his books back in the ‘90s when he was doing coke and weed and hanging out with Marxists? Whoever it  was, it is now causing quite a bit of consternation for BHO’s camp because they  put on his bio that he was born in Kenya. This publication, apparently, even  confused Michelle about Barack’s country of origin, as this video points  out.

Kenya? Now, what kind of crap publishing company gets the  nation of origin wrong for a rising star and does not correct it until 16 years  later when he begins his bid for the Oval Office? Huh? I’ll tell you what kind  of company: a sloppy company … a sloppy, sloppy company. Or … or … a racist  company. Someone get Sharpton on this now that the Trayvon case is unraveling,  as this could be fresh investigative fodder for the revered sleuth named  Al.

I’ll tell you who else could have made such a ghastly mistake:  a company run by women. Yep, that’s it. I bet a woman made that error because we  all know how women can’t spell very good. Or is it goodly? Goodish? Hold on, let  me check and see if it was a chick who made the mistake. Yep, one Miriam  Goderich was the one who bungled BHO’s bio. Oh, I’m sure she “mistakenly  thought,” as my buddy Neal said, “that Obama was from Kentucky, misspelled it,  and it got auto-corrected to ‘Kenya,’ and no one caught the error before it went  to press.” I bet she got fired and has never, ever done any work that relates to  Obama since … or am I wrong about that?

Now, for detractors who are saying, “Well, Barack should have  spotted the typo [the only glaring typo, by the way, on the entire brochure] and  demanded his agency correct it.” All I’ve got to say is  that you cannot expect a Harvard Law student to be busied with checking this  type of minutiae as he was hard at it with macro issues, such as studying  critical race theory, black liberation theology and Rules for  Radicals.

It’s only low-level authors like me who’ve got the time to  check for blunders, and thank God I did because on my most recent book my  publicist—another woman—said I was originally from Tanzania instead of Texas.  Women.

The fail-safe is that we have the mainstream media who  will clear up this issue of Obama’s birthplace and get us back to the big issues  of gay marriage, free rubbers for female law students and cars that run on  algae.

[sirjohn]

Obama Justifies FEMA   imprisonment of civilians!

Rachel Maddow, you know  the  ultra left Bush hatter, Republican basher, but wait, watch the   video,

Just wait for it, let her vent about W,  and Guantanamo, etc.. then the fun (or if he gets re-elected,  the horror ) begins:

[siboneyes]

Failed War on Women: Romney Now Leads Obama Among Married Women by 17 Points

Posted by Jammie on May 22, 2012

Just a statistical blip, I guess. Of 21 points.

On several measures, the presumptive Republican nominee is gaining ground on President Obama even as the president has slipped in some areas, according to a new ABC News-Washington Post poll out today.

Which candidate better understands the economic problems of average Americans?

Back in February Obama led Romney on that question by 17 percentage points. But the former Massachusetts governor has managed to cut the president’s advantage roughly in half — down to an 8 point gap.

And who’s more to blame for the tough economy — President George W. Bush or President Obama?

By a 49 to 34 percent margin more Americans still say Bush, but that 15 point divide has narrowed since January when it stood at 25 points.

The poll found the gender gap isn’t so wide anymore. Obama leads among female registered voters 51 to 44 percent — a smaller margin than back in April when he led 57 percent to 38 percent. The reason? Married women, who favored Obama by 4 points last month, now support Romney by 17 points.

Imagine if there was a swing in any category of 21 points in Obama’s favor. You suppose that would generate some headlines?

Worth noting of the issues most important to voters, 19 items are listed. Gay marriage is important to 1% of the respondents. Same for abortion. No  wonder Obama wants to distract the public with irrelevant issues.

How bad does it look for Obama? This poll was just of adults, not registered voters, and included only 22% Republicans.

[sirjohn]

Forget Bain — Obama’s  public-equity  record is the real scandal

By Marc A. Thiessen,

Washington Post May 24 2012



Despite a growing backlash from his fellow  Democrats,  President Obama has doubled down on his attacks on Mitt  Romney’s tenure at Bain  Capital. But the strategy could backfire in ways  Obama did not anticipate. After all, if Romney’s record in private  equity is fair game, then so is  Obama’s record in public equity — and that record is not  pretty.

Since taking office, Obama  has  invested billions of taxpayer dollars in private businesses, including  as part  of his stimulus spending bill. Many of those investments have  turned out to be  unmitigated disasters — leaving in their wake  bankruptcies, layoffs, criminal  investigations and taxpayers on the hook  for billions. Consider just a few  examples of Obama’s public equity  failures:

● Raser Technologies. In 2010, the Obama administration  gave  Raser a $33 million taxpayer-funded grant to build a power plant in  Beaver  Creek, Utah. According to WSJ, after burning through our tax  dollars, the  company filed for bankruptcy protection in 2012. The plant  now has fewer than 10  employees, and Raser owes $1.5 million in back  taxes.

● ECOtality. The Obama administration gave ECOtality  $126.2  million in taxpayer money in 2009 for, among other things, the  installation of  14,000 electric car chargers in five states. Obama even  hosted the company’s  president, Don Karner, in the first lady's box during  the 2010 State of the  Union address as an example of a stimulus success  story. According to ECOtality’s own SEC filings, the company  has  since incurred more than $45 million in losses and has told the  federal  government, “We may not achieve or sustain profitability on a  quarterly or  annual basis in the future.”

Worse, according to CBS News the company is “under investigation for insider trading,” and  Karner has been subpoenaed “for any and all documentation surrounding  the public  announcement of the first Department of Energy grant to the  company.”

● Nevada Geothermal Power (NGP). The Obama administration  gave  NGP a $98.s5 million taxpayer loan guarantee in 2010.  NYT  reported last October that the company is in “financial turmoil” and that “[a]fter a series of technical missteps that are draining Nevada   Geothermal’s cash reserves, its own auditor concluded in a filing released  last  week that there was ‘significant doubt about the company’s ability to  continue  as a going concern.’ ”

● First Solar. The Obama administration provided First  Solar  with more than$3 billion in loan guarantees for power plants in  Arizona and  California. According to a Bloomberg Businessweek report   last week, the  company “fell to a record low in Nasdaq Stock Market  trading May 4 after  reporting $401 million in restructuring costs tied to  firing 30 percent of its  workforce.”

[sirjohn]

PART 2



● Abound Solar, Inc. The Obama administration gave Abound Solar a $400 million loan guarantee  to  build photovoltaic panel factories. According to Forbes, in February the  company  halted production and laid off 180 employees.

● Beacon Power. The Obama administration gave Beacon — a   green-energy storage company — a $43 million loan guarantee. According to CBS News, at the time of  the  loan, “Standard and Poor’s had confidentially given the project a  dismal outlook  of ‘CCC-plus.’ ” In the fall of 2011, Beacon received a delisting notice from Nasdaq  and  filed for bankruptcy.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. A company called SunPower got a $1.2 billion loan  guarantee  from the Obama administration, and as of January, the company  owed more than it  was worth. Brightsource got a $1.6 billion loan guarantee and posted  a  string of net losses totaling $177 million. And, of course, let’s not  forget  Solyndra — the solar panel manufacturer that received $535 million  in  taxpayer-funded loan guarantees and went bankrupt, leaving taxpayers on  the  hook.

Amazingly, Obama has declared that all the projects  received  funding “based solely on their merits.” But as  Hoover  Institution scholar Peter Schweizer reported in his book, “Throw Them All Out,” fully 71 percent of  the  Obama Energy Department’s grants and loans went to “individuals who  were  bundlers, members of Obama’s National Finance Committee, or large  donors to the  Democratic Party.” Collectively, these Obama cronies raised  $457,834 for his  campaign, and they were in turn approved for grants or  loans of nearly $11.35  billion. Obama said this week it’s not the  president’s job “to make a lot of  money for investors.” Well, he sure  seems to have made a lot of (taxpayer) money  for investors in his  political machine.

All that cronyism and corruption is catching up  with  the administration. According to Politico, “The Energy   Department’s inspector general has launched more than 100 criminal   investigations” related to the department’s green-energy   programs.

Now the man who made Solyndra  a  household name says Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital “is what this  campaign  is going to be about.” Good luck with that, Mr. President. If  Obama wants to  attack Romney’s alleged private equity failures as chief  executive of Bain, he’d  better be ready to defend his own massive public  equity failures as chief  executive of the United  States.