Publicado: 01-17-2012 07:47 PM
Gingrich: Obama “Most Effective Food Stamp President In History”
The number of those who use food stamps has jumped to 45,800,000 or nearly 15% of the nation’s population.
“I’ve said now for months, this is the most effective food stamp President in history. That sounds like it is an attack, it’s just a statement of fact. It’s just that his administration kills jobs. They are driving Americans onto food stamps. Most Americans would rather have a paycheck”
Newt Turns Racially Charged Question from Williams into Explanation of Conservatism
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ 1/17/2012 Rush Limbaugh
RUSH: From the debate last night, here's Frank Luntz. This is with Hannity after the debate last night.
LUNTZ: I've never seen it in a debate, a standing ovation in the middle of a debate. Remember, there's only five candidates up there so you would assume that only 20% would award them their support. Newt Gingrich got a standing ovation, and he did so fighting with your own Juan Williams over the whole welfare issue.
RUSH: Yeah, but Newt did something last night that he's not done before. Juan Williams asked the question, and Newt just answered it as though Juan Williams was a robot. He didn't say, "See, here we have another example of a distorted, biased media, you people trying to get us fighting with one another." He didn't waste any time going after Juan Williams; didn't accuse Juan Williams of ill motives; didn't even acknowledge Juan Williams had a motive, just answered the question. Juan Williams speaking, "You recently said black Americans should demand jobs, not food stamps. You also said that poor kids lack a strong work ethic and proposed having them work as janitors in their schools. Can't you see that this is viewed at a minimum as insulting to all Americans, but particularly to black Americans?"
GINGRICH: No. I don't see that. (applause) New York City pays their janitors an absurd amount of money because of the union. You could take one janitor and hire 30-some kids to work in the school for the price of one janitor, and those 30 kids would be a lot less likely to drop out. They would actually have money in their pocket. They'd learn to show up for work. They could do light janitorial duty. They could work in the cafeteria. They could work in the front office. They could work in the library. They'd be getting money, which is a good thing if you're poor. Only the elites despise earning money. (cheers and applause)
WILLIAMS: We saw some of this reaction during your visit to a black church in South Carolina. (booing) We saw some of this during your visit to a black church in South Carolina where a woman asked you why you referred to President Obama as "the food stamp president." It sounds as if you're seeking to belittle people. (booing.)
RUSH: Juan Williams got booed. Still, Newt didn't take the bait.
GINGRICH: The fact is that more people have been put on food stamps by Barack Obama than any president in American history. Now, I know among the politically correct you're not supposed to use facts that are uncomfortable. The area that ought to be I-73 was called by Barack Obama a corridor of shame because of unemployment. Has it improved in three years? No. They haven't build the road. They haven't helped the people. They haven't done anything. (cheers and applause) I believe every American of every background has been endowed by their creator with the right to pursue happiness, and if that makes liberals unhappy, I'm gonna continue to find ways to help poor people learn how to get a job, learn how to get a better job, and learn someday to own the job. (cheers and applause)
Publicado: 01-18-2012 01:14 PM
GEORGE W. BUSH, OBAMA Y LA AMNISTIA
When President Bush took office, the Senate was split 50-50 between the Democrats and Republicans. With VP Cheney’s tiebreaking vote, the Republicans controlled the Senate until Senator Jim Jeffords from Vermont switched from a Republican to an Independent in June 2001 and sided with the Democrats, which controlled that Chamber until November, 2002. The following is cut and pasted from the official Senate website http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/one_item_
Republicans had control of Congress and Senate 3 year under George W. Bush 2003-2006. In 2007 Democrats took control of the Congress, Dem. 233 vs. Republicans 198.
When Bush tried to give the amnesty to the illegal’s, both, the House and Senate, were under the control of the Democrats who blocked it and Obama was one of the senators who voted against the amnesty.
BUSH TRIES TO SAVE IMMIGRATION BILL
By Gilbert Cruz/Washington
TIME JUN. 11, 2007
It’s indicative of how very badly President Bush needs a victory — any victory — that he plans to make a rare trip to Capitol Hill Tuesday afternoon to attend a weekly Republican luncheon. There, he will make a personal appeal to senators on behalf of his bipartisan immigration reform bill, the progress of which came to a sudden and surprising halt late Thursday night after a failed attempt to bring the legislation to a vote. While Bush has previously leaned on Vice President Cheney to make these kinds of congressional entreaties (the President last sat in on a Senate policy lunch in 2002), either Bush’s desperation or the VP’s lack of enthusiasm for the measure — or quite possibly both — has forced his hand.
The bill — which includes provisions for increasing border security, a temporary worker program, and a path towards legalizing the nation’s approximately 12 million illegal immigrants — is a key component of Bush’s domestic agenda for his final year and a half in office. It was pulled from the floor Thursday after almost two weeks of debate when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada, frustrated by the number of amendments brought forth by critics, called to end debate.
Obama después de oponerse a la amnistía en 2007 cuando Bush trató de dárselas, al aspirar a la presidencia prometió a los ilegales darles la amnistia en sus primeros 100 días, algo que no ocurrió a pesar que entonces controlaba ambas camaras con enormes mayorias y no necesitaba un solo voto republicano para cumplir con su palabra empeñad... y todavía hay idi...otas que votarían por su re-eleccion... ¡el que nace para cornudo del cielo le caen los cuernos!!!
Publicado: 03-07-2012 05:13 PM
Barack Obama’s Sole Article in Harvard Law Review Promotes Abortion Life News ^ | 8/22/08 | Steven Ertelt
Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) – How strongly does Barack Obama believe in unlimited abortions? Strongly enough that the only article he wrote for the Harvard Law Review while he was a law school student talked about how fervently believed in legalized abortion. Obama’s name wasn’t attached to any other legal scholarship during the time.
In an article unearthed by the Politico web site, Obama, as the president of the Harvard Law Review, wrote an unsigned article touting abortion.
The web site says the article comes in at six pages and is contained in the third volume of the 1990 Harvard Law Review.
In the work, Obama considered a parenthetical abortion issue — whether unborn children have a legal right to sue their mothers for damage sustained during pregnancy, from such things as alcohol or illegal drugs.
Obama says no and writes supportively of the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court case and another from the Illinois Supreme Court saying no such right exists.
According to Politico, Obama wrote: "[T]he case raises the broader policy and constitutional considerations that argue against using civil liability to control the behavior of pregnant women."
In a discussion of abortion itself, Obama wrote that government has more important business than "ensuring that any particular fetus is born."
He also decried any limits on abortion, saying the government has an interest in "preventing increasing numbers of children from being born in to lives of pain and despair."
Politico said the Obama campaign confirmed the pro-abortion presidential candidate wrote the piece in question and that it was one of the typical articles law students would write briefing and opining on federal and state court decisions.
In an email to the web site, Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt also confirmed that Obama "remains committed to" the sentiments he expressed in the piece.
Obama’s article is on page 823 of Volume 103 of the Harvard Law Review and would likely be located in larger public libraries and databases that chronicle legal articles in scholarly publications.
Publicado: 03-10-2012 11:40 AM
By Katie Pavlich 3/9/2012
The Obama administration and DNC Chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz want Americans to believe that the economy is turning around and that people are finding jobs, but the fact is, Americans aren't finding jobs and unemployment statistics aren't telling the full story about the economy and millions are out of work.
The latest report for February shows lingering economic disparities among different segments of the population. And, as has been the case for decades, the unemployment rate used by the Bureau of Labor Statistics does not tell the whole story. Counting only those Americans who are actively looking for work, the jobless rate is 8.3 percent, just like it was in January. But counting those who stopped looking for work within the last year, the rate is 9.8 percent.
So what's the solution? More legislation according to Republicans.
Hunter is pushing legislation that would require the Bureau of Labor Statistics to broaden its definition for the unemployment rate. He wants the department to count those who stopped looking for work as well, which would put last month's rate at 9.8 percent. "We just want to know what the truth is, because we can't make good policy here unless we know what the actual unemployment number is," Hunter told Fox News on Thursday, ahead of the latest labor report release. "It's not 8 percent -- anybody who's out there in the real world knows that. We need real numbers, not D.C. numbers."
Publicado: 03-11-2012 11:16 AM
Townhall.com ^ | March 11, 2012 | Doug Giles
This past week Breitbart.comreleased a video of a young Obama singing the praises of a race-baiting prof from Harvard. I hate to say this, but I don’t think that particular video is going to dissuade the Obama zombies or the blissfully disengaged from voting for four more years of this fetid mess.
Why the pessimism, you ask? Well, it’s not because the incriminating video is not significant; it clearly is, as it once again establishes BHO’s deep allegiance to the lunatic fringe on the Left. However, his step-n-fetch voting block shares his diehard Euro-socialistic beliefs and does not mind 48 more months of an economic maelstrom at all if it means free candy for them for the rest of their mediocre, jealous lives.
Therefore, not only is that video not going to convert any of them, it will probably have the adverse effect of inciting more economic stupidity and racial bigotry by turning the ones who can read onto the mad scribblings of Derrick Bell and his bellicose beliefs.
Those of the apathetic middle who are paying minimal attention to our political milieu are not going to care enough to watch a 1991 video of Obama talking about crap they’re dispassionate about; they’re more concerned about whether or not Kim Kardashian’s butt is real, and besides, Soledad O’Brien has already told them that there is nothing to the videos. Move along, cattle. Move along.
What Breitbart.comand others have to dig up on Obama has to be so outlandish (like the infamous ACORN videos) that it completely derails the Obama love train and causes his fawners and the American Idol idiots to say, “Ew,” when it comes to voting for him this November.
For example, I’d be on the lookout for pictures, videos or documents such as the following …
1. A photograph of a young Obama kissing a Sarah Palin poster in his dorm room.
2. A video of a 22-year-old Barack clubbing a baby seal with a ball-peen hammer and/or shooting a polar bear with a .416 Rigby. 3. A video of a youthful BHO slow dancing with Lynne Cheney to Air Supply’s 1980 hit, “I’m All Out of Love.” 4. A dredged-up Occidental essay of Obama’s praising de Tocqueville’s tome, Democracy in America. 5. A 1999 video of Barack sitting in the front row of a Blue Collar Comedy show in D.C. 6. A photograph of the interior of Obama’s house with décor from Anthropologie. 7. A video of Barack stealing Sandra Fluke’s condoms she has stockpiled in her dorm then poking a hole in her waterbed and cutting the electric cord to her bedside lava lamp.
These videos, photos and documents alone would be the only empirical evidence that would shatter the spell the Obama machine has used to voodoo the gullibale GP.
No, it doesn’t matter that communist groups, terrorist organizations, or race-baiting preachers and professors endorse him. It’s not important that his economic policies are the failed derivatives of Karl Marx’s, or that gas is heading toward six bucks a gallon, or that his favorite author actually dedicated his book to Lucifer. None of these things faze the Obama fanatics, so I’m afraid investigative journalists are going to have to try harder and dig deeper.
Publicado: 03-12-2012 01:37 PM
Obama Approval Continuing to Decline
By Katie Pavlich 3/12/2012
OBAMA'S REAL REAL UNEMPLOYMENT 19.1% AND GOING UP, UP, UP!!!!
Margaret Thatcher: "El socialismo dura hasta que se les acaba el dinero de otros"
Winston Churchill: "El socialismo es la filosofía del fracaso, el credo de los ignorantes, el evangelio de la envidia y su virtud es el reparto igualitario de la miseria."
Obama’s approval rating on the deficit hit an all-time low, with a slender 32 percent giving him positive marks. Among independents, 70 percent disapprove here, also a new high. Even on foreign policy — a onetime strong point — Obama’s ratings look worse. For the first time in nearly a year, as many Americans disapprove as approve of his handling of the war in Afghanistan. On Iran, a slim majority now disapproves of how he is dealing with the possibility of the country obtaining nuclear weapons.
High gas prices are finally taking their toll, despite old media doing everything they can to downplay the situation:
On energy issues generally, almost half the country gives Obama negative marks. Fifty percent of Americans see the Obama administration as having the power to do something about the cost of a gallon of gasoline.
Considering the President personally lobbied to kill the Keystone Pipeline project and as we watch solar company after solar company propped up by taxpayer loans go bankrupt, I doubt his approval numbers on energy will be going up anytime soon.
OBAMA IS FULFILLING HIS PROMISE TO RISE THE GAS IN U.S. TO THE LEVELS OF EUROPE.
Publicado: 03-20-2012 12:10 PM
OAXACA, Mexico - The elder daughter of U.S. President Barack Obama is spending her spring break in the historic Mexican city of Oaxaca in the company of 12 friends, a state police official said.
The young tourists, including 13-year-old Malia Ann Obama, are staying at a downtown hotel in this city famous for its colonial architecture and well-preserved native American traditions, the official said.
"We are here to block access to the hotel by other people and escort the vehicles that are carrying the visitors to tourism sites," the police official told AFP under the condition of anonymity.
Malia Obama and her friend are guarded by 25 U.S. Secret Service agents as well as Mexican police, the official noted.
The group, which arrived in Oaxaca Saturday, has already visited the architectural zone of Mitla and the tree of El Tule believed to have one thousand years.
The sightseeing plan also includes visits to Monte Alban known for its archeological research sites and Oaxaca’s famous artisan quarters.
Mientras el Indice de Miseria gracias a Obama rompe el récord de Carter, la familia real Obama vive al estilo del Rey Luis XVI... caviar para ellos, para el pueblo cake!!!
Publicado: 04-30-2012 09:46 PM
New Obama slogan has long ties to Marxism, socialism
By Victor Morton
April 30, 2012,
The Obama campaign apparently didn’t look backwards into history when selecting its new campaign slogan, “Forward” — a word with a long and rich association with European Marxism.
Many Communist and radical publications and entities throughout the 19th and 20th centuries had the name “Forward!” or its foreign cognates. Wikipedia has an entire section called “Forward (generic name of socialist publications).”
“The name Forward carries a special meaning in socialist political terminology. It has been frequently used as a name for socialist, communist and other left-wing newspapers and publications,” the online encyclopedia explains.
The slogan “Forward!” reflected the conviction of European Marxists and radicals that their movements reflected the march of history, which would move forward past capitalism and into socialism and communism.
The Obama campaign released its new campaign slogan Monday in a 7-minute video. The title card has simply the word “Forward” with the “O” having the familiar Obama logo from 2008. It will be played at rallies this weekend that mark the Obama re-election campaign’s official beginning.
There have been at least two radical-left publications named “Vorwaerts” (the German word for “Forward”). One was the daily newspaper of the Social Democratic Party of Germany whose writers included Friedrich Engels and Leon Trotsky. It still publishes as the organ of Germany’s SDP, though that party has changed considerably since World War II. Another was the 1844 biweekly reader of the Communist League. Karl Marx, Engels and Mikhail Bakunin are among the names associated with that publication.
East Germany named its Army soccer club ASK Vorwaerts Berlin (later FC Vorwaerts Frankfort).
Vladimir Lenin founded the publication “Vpered” (the Russian word for “forward”) in 1905. Soviet propaganda film-maker Dziga Vertov made a documentary whose title is sometimes translated as “Forward, Soviet” (though also and more literally as “Stride, Soviet”).
Conservative critics of the Obama administration have noted numerous ties to radicalism and socialists throughout Mr. Obama’s history, from his first political campaign being launched from the living room of two former Weather Underground members, to appointing as green jobs czar Van Jones, a self-described communist.
Publicado: 05-05-2012 09:27 AM
ABC news .. Diane Sawyer...."Bring America Back?"
SHOCKING ABC News on Obama/USA Infrastructure
Diane Sawyer reporting on U.S. Bridge projects going to the
Chinese.... NOT Americans.
The bridges are right here in the U.S. And yet Chinese contractors are coming in to do the work.
What about jobs for Americans???
This one should be tough for Obama supporters to swallow....
AND it comes from ABC NEWS...no Snopes or Wikileaks on this one!!
U.S.A. Bridges and Roads Being Built by Chinese Firms
Shocking to say the least!
This video is a jaw-dropper that will make you sick.
(It was also shocking that ABC was actually reporting this story....
Maybe reality is finally hitting the Main Stream Media ???)
Our tax dollars are at work - for CHINA !!!
PLEASE PASS ON TO EVERYONE !!!
Pass on to Democrats and Republicans
Publicado: 05-08-2012 01:20 PM
CHRIS WALLACE INTERVIEW MARCO RUBIO ON FOX 5/6/2012
Marco Rubio was on "FOX News Sunday With Chris Wallace" today. OMG, the dude was AWESOME!!! He did not miss a step; sharp, sensible, intelligent answers to every question. I was amazed at how smart this guy is. Don't know for sure, but, you might be able to see the interview on FOX.