¡Bienvenido a los Foros de Univision! Participa, intercambia mensajes privados, sube tus fotos y forma parte de nuestra Comunidad. | Ingresa | Regístrate Gratis
Responder
Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009
0 Kudos

SHOCKING-ABC news-Diane Sawyer..."Bring America Back?"

ABC news .. Diane Sawyer...."Bring America Back?"

 

SHOCKING ABC   News on Obama/USA Infrastructure

 

Diane Sawyer reporting on U.S. Bridge projects going to the

Chinese.... NOT Americans.

 

The bridges are right here in the U.S. And yet Chinese contractors are coming in to do the work.

What about jobs for Americans???

 

 

This one should be tough for Obama supporters   to swallow....

AND it comes from ABC NEWS...no Snopes or Wikileaks on this one!!

 

 

U.S.A.  Bridges and Roads Being Built by Chinese Firms

Shocking to say the least!

 

This video is a jaw-dropper that will make you sick.

 

(It   was also shocking that ABC was actually reporting this story....

Maybe reality is finally hitting the Main Stream Media ???)

 

Our tax dollars are at work - for CHINA !!!

 

 

CLICK here: U.S. Bridges, Roads Being Built by   Chinese Firms | Video - ABC News

 

 

PLEASE   PASS ON TO EVERYONE !!!

 

 

Pass on to Democrats and Republicans

Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: SHOCKING-ABC news-Diane Sawyer..."Bring America Bac

Obama launches campaign in empty  arena Organizers even had people move to  floor to project larger crowd

5/5/2012



(BREITBART) — Barack Obama  launched his campaign in unspectacular fashion today at Ohio State University,  the largest college in the crucial swing state. A photo posted to twitter by  Mitt Romney’s campaign spokesman Ryan Williams reveals sparse attendance. The  above image, according to Williams, was taken during the President’s first  official campaign speech.

During the speech, Obama ripped into the presumptive GOP  nominee and discussed nation building at home, but the most newsworthy item of  the day was not the talking points Obama delivered: it was the crowd… or lack  thereof.

According to ABC News, the Obama campaign had expected an “overflow” of people. Instead, the arena looked half-empty. The Columbus  Dispatch reports that Obama organizers even had people move from the seats to  the floor of the gym in order to project a larger crowd on  television.

Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Fraud found in Obama’s online donations.

Fraud found in Obama’s online donations
 
By Neil Munro - The Daily Caller  5/8/2012
President Barack Obama’s 2012 campaign has hundreds of thousands of eager, low-dollar donors — and a tiny trickle of unwilling, defrauded donors.

The latest example comes from David Newman, who found a $15 charge, dated May 6, from the “Obama For America” campaign on one of his debit cards.

Newman had supported Obama in 2008, but “I didn’t sign up to say ‘Do this every three months or every three years when you need money,’” he told The Daily Caller.

“This is completely 100 percent unauthorized,” said Newman, an information technology specialist. The money has since been returned by Bank of America, and the debit card has been cancelled, he said.

Newman’s example follows the publication of two examples of small-scale fraud by Powerline, a conservative blog. For example, “Bill G” told Powerline that he had found a $10 charge to “Obama for America” a few weeks after someone had secretly changed his address in the bank’s database.

The Obama campaign declined to answer TheDC’s questions for this story.

These minor examples of fraud, however, follow the discovery that Obama’s campaigns in 2008 and 2012 adopted shady practices that increased the potential for fraud.

In 2008, for example, Obama’s 2008 campaign accepted donations made via untraceable digital gift cards sold over the counter by Mastercard and Visa. National Journal proved that practice on October 24, 2008, but a recent test by the DC showed that his campaign is now rejecting donations made via gift-cards.

However, Obama is still using many of the same tech experts that he used in 2008, and is still accepting credit card donations made under incorrect names, according to numerous reports from blogs.

Like in 2008, the 2012 campaign is also not asking donors to provide the three-digit or four-digit CVV number on credit cards. That decision reduces the campaign’s fundraising costs, but increases the chance of fraudulent donations by people who know the primary long number of a credit card, but not the short CVV number.

The practice may have contributed to a 2008 fraud when a woman in Missouri, Mary Biskup, discovered that her name had been attached to $174,800 in credit card donations sent to the Obama campaign. Biskup told the Washington Post that her credit-card was not charged for the donation.

Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: Fraud found in Obama’s online donations.

part 2

Obama’s campaign is not legally required to ask for the CVV  number. It is also not required to confirm that the names given by small-dollar  online donors are correct, partly because the campaign automatically collects  the real names and addresses attached to donors’ credit  cards.

Yet a campaign’s decision to accept the false names attached  to small donations can have a broader impact than a few cases of  fraud.

That’s because campaigns are free to assume that multiple  small-scale donations made via one credit  card are from different people, providing that different false names are  provided online with each donation.

They’re free to do that even if donors’ fake names are utterly  implausible, such as “Adolf Hitler,” “Osama bin Laden” or “Mickey  Mouse.”

The loophole is found in rules set by the Federal Election  Commission, which has little legal authority to investigate evidence of  small-scale credit card fraud by political campaigns.

The 2012 Obama campaign’s apparent decision to accept  small-scale donations made under false names could allow for a stream of  donations from illegal donors, such as people who are neither citizens nor  residents of the United States.

The decision would also allow the campaign to accept donations  far above the limit of $2,500 per person, providing each donor supplies a false  name with each donation. The FEC limits personal donations to $2,500 per  campaign.

So far, there’s no evidence that Obama’s 2012 campaign is  accepting illegal online donations that exceed federal limits or that come from  foreigners. He has returned high value checks from at least three people  suspected of links to criminals.

But if any campaign chooses to accept online donations under  false names, and if it chooses not to add up contributions made via the same credit card, it could also receive a  financially significant amount of illegal donations.

That political risk exists because simple software allows  illegal donors to deliver unlimited numbers of small-scale donations via credit cards.

In 2008, National Journal successfully used custom made software to  deliver numerous “robo-donations” to three campaigns via gift cards. The test  was conducted after a check of Obama’s 2008 campaign records which showed  numerous, sequential and identical donations donations by donors with strange  names, such “Doodad Pro.”

“Doodad Pro” submitted at least 791 contributions by October  2008, providing $19,065 to the campaign, while “Good Will” sent in 835 donations  worth $20,225 between March and May 2008. The source of those donations was not  disclosed by the 2008 campaign.

GOP campaigns have so far had better security than Obama’s  campaigns.

In 2008, Sen. John McCain’s online donation system rejected  anonymous gift card donations. Currently, Gov. Mitt Romney’s websites asks  donors for the CVV number.

A pattern of fraud in the Obama campaign’s fundraising system  should damage the campaign’s trustworthiness, said Newman. “The one thing you  have is trust when doing online business… [and] if you have someone collecting  credit-card information, you are totally responsible” for its security, he  said.

At the moment, he added, “this smells like a Nigerian  bank-account scam.”

 

Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: SHOCKING-ABC news-Diane Sawyer..."Bring America Bac

Newsweek Calls Obama the  First  Gay  President

By Katie Pavlich

5/14/2012

 

It seems as if Newsweek may have jumped the shark with   its  latest cover implying President Obama isn't just a supporter of  gay  marriage,  but that he is actually gay himself.

The news-magazine, which hits stands today, is using the   shock  factor of labeling the straight, married, father-of-two President  to  draw  attention to itself.

 



Last week, Obama touted his pro-gay marriage stance on   his  Twitter page and on his campaign website.

 

And of course, the cover article is written by  Andrew   Sullivan, the same writer who heavily questioned whether Trig Palin   was  really Sarah Palin's son.

President Obama is taking full advantage of his "coming   out"  moment on gay marraige and will head to a swanky NYC fundraisier  with  gay singer Ricky Martin today.

Obama is heading to the Rubin Museum of Art in Chelsea  for  a  $5,000-a-ticket fundraiser co-hosted by the LGBT Leadership  Council and  openly  gay singer Ricky Martin. 

Ricky Martin is also an admirer and fan of Fidel Castro  and  Hugo Chavez... 

BIRDS OF A FEATHER F.CK   TOGETHER!!!

Retirado
sirjohn
Mensajes: 137,146
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: SHOCKING-ABC news-Diane Sawyer..."Bring America Bac

A Racial Revolution?

By Thomas Sowell 5/19/2012

 

Now that census data show -- for the first time in American history -- the number of white babies born exceeded by the number of babies born to non-white minorities the question is: What does this mean for the future of American society?

Politically, it means that minorities who traditionally vote overwhelmingly for Democrats can ensure that the country veers ever further to the left over the years, making America more like the welfare states of Europe, whose unsustainable spending led ultimately to finical crises and widespread riots.

But this is not strictly a matter of whites versus non-whites. Jews vote consistently, and almost as overwhelmingly, for Democrats as blacks do. Moreover, Asian Americans are by no means as likely as other non-whites to vote for the class warfare, tax and spend agenda of the Democrats.

Yet when all is said and done, the future political direction of the country seems painfully clear for these demographic trends, unless something happens to change the current correlation between race and political party affiliation. Moreover, even that may not be enough.

Even if Republicans can siphon off enough votes from groups that normally vote for Democrats to keep the two-party system alive, the preservation of the Republican Party is a trivial issue compared to the preservation of American society.

If Republican politicians save themselves by becoming Democrats under a different label -- and appeal to minorities as minorities, rather than as Americans -- the same policies and attitudes will have the same destructive effect on the American economy and society.

Refusing to cut back on entitlement spending, for example, means that the current generation can continue to enjoy government-subsidized amenities, at the expense of future generations who can be left to struggle to get necessities, after the money runs out and government's promises can no longer be kept.

The growth of ever bigger and even more intrusive government means that the freedom, for which generations of Americans have fought and died on battlefields, around the world can be slowly but steadily lost within our own country.

Painful as such outcomes can be the dangers do not end there. A continuation of the current political tendency to take away the money required for national defense, and spend it instead on handouts that will win votes, means that our enemies around the world will have golden opportunities at our expense.

Again, the dangers may not be immediate. But they can be catastrophic when they catch up with us -- and catch us unprepared. We recovered from Pearl Harbor at enormous cost, including the needless deaths of American soldiers, fighting for their lives with obsolete military equipment against enemies with state of the art weapons.

But even such sacrifices which brought us time to catch up during the Second World War, may not even be enough in a nuclear age.

What can be done now, to head off the many dangers in our current political policies and attitudes? There is not much we can do about demographic trends. But the changing composition of the American population is not, in itself, the fundamental danger. After all, vast millions of immigrants crossed the Atlantic for generations on end, and began the process of becoming Americans. Millions of black people likewise began that process after being set free.

Demography is not destiny. But the history of Balkanized and polarized societies in the 20th century is a history of horrors that we dare not ignore.

We are not at that terrible point yet. But that is the direction in which we are headed, under the spell of magic words like "multiculturalism" and "diversity," which have become substitutes for thoughts, even among those who pride themselves on being "thinking people."

Our whole educational system, from the elementary schools to the universities, is permeated with ideologies of group grievances and resentments, painting each group into the corner of its own separate subculture, instead of drawing them into the mainstream of the American culture that made this the greatest nation on earth.

Unless the fashionable Balkanization is stopped, demography can become destiny -- and a tragedy for all.

Retirado
sirjohn
Mensajes: 137,146
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: SHOCKING-ABC news-Diane Sawyer..."Bring America Bac

 

CUNDE EL PANICO EN LA FILAS  DEMOCRATAS!!!

 

NEGROS NUBARRONES SE CIERNEN SOBRE LA CAMPAÑA DE  OBAMA

 

PRIMARIAS DEMOCRATAS AUGURAN A  OBAMA UNA DERROTA MONUMENTAL:



WEST VIRGINIA: 41% DE LOS  VOTANTES DEMOCRATAS REPUDIARON A OBAMA PREFIRIENDO VOTAR POR UN DELINCUENTE  PRESO EN TEXAS.

 

ARKANSAS: 41% VOTAN EN CONTRA DE OBAMA Y A FAVOR DE UN  DESCONOCIDO QUE SOLO CONTABA EN SU CAMPAÑA CON $500 MIENTRAS OBAMA GASTABA  MILLONES DESINFORMANDO AL PUEBLO.

 

KENTUCKY: 42% DE LOS DEMOCRATAS  VOTARON "NO COMPROMETIDOS A VOTAR POR OBAMA", EN LO QUE CONSTITUYE  UN CONTUNDENTE REPUDIO A SU REGIMEN CORRUPTO, Y POR LO VISTO ES UN REFLEJO  DEL RECHAZO AL MARXISMO DE OBAMA A NIVEL NACIONAL POR LOS PROPIOS  DEMOCRATAS!!!