Responder
¡Bienvenido! Para que puedas participar, intercambiar mensajes privados, subir fotos, dar kudos y ser parte de las conversaciones necesitas estar ingresado en los Foros. | Ingresa | Regístrate Gratis
Junior
cruzbelky
Mensajes: 88
Registrado: ‎03-03-2009
0 Kudos

¡¡AQUI Y AHORA TREMENDO PROGRAMA LLENO DE INFORMACIONES IMPORTANTES!!!

La verdad que en su "nueva versión" por asi decirlo Ustedes tanto los que estan al frente como los que estan detras de cámara estan haciendo un trabajo maravilloso, todo en coordinación e información a la altura de este Programa, me quedo esperando MAS y veo que llega la hora final, nosotros nos mantenemos al pendiente de cada "Historia", (no puedo ponerme a escrirbirle) para no perder el hilo de este.

No podia pasar por alto LO BIEN-E INTERESANTE que esta o que siempre ha sido, Victor Hugo S. oh mi Dios siempre le toca lo peor, lo admiro por LUCHON-TRABAJADOR- DEDICACION EN SU TRABAJO, todos tienen su admiración, Maria E. fuera de Florida reportando esto tambien tiene su "peso" al dejar su familia a hacer este magnifico trabajo.

Esperando el Martes para estar al dia, con cada historia.

Exitos siempre tendrán!!!

Banned
sirjohn
Mensajes: 137,146
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: ¡¡AQUI Y AHORA TREMENDO PROGRAMA LLENO DE INFORMACIONES IMPORTANTES!!!

A LOS OBAMA LES GUSTA EL SUPER-LUJO

 

 

 

EL MUNDO, MADRID

 

26 JUL 2010

Qué decepción. A Obama y a Michelle también les gusta el lujo. Qué digo el lujo, el súperlujo, como a los jeques árabes, a los nuevos ricos y a Correa el de 'la Gürtel'.

     Tenían múltiples posibilidades para haber elegido un hotel estupendo y con encanto, pero han ido a escoger el hotel más lujoso de España y el lugar que en sí mismo es el símbolo de todos los pecados que nos han llevado a la crisis: Marbella.

        La milla de oro, el derroche sin cuento, los billetes de 500 paseando por Puerto Banús, los yates de todas las mafias que convergen en la Costa del Sol. Un lugar que al estilo Obama no le pega ni con cola. Dice la directora del Hotel Villapadierna que la clave de su éxito está en una 'mística' especial que impregna sus salones, sus habitaciones y sus hermosos jardines. Ya pueden. Por 5.000 euros la noche, la mística tendría que llegar al éxtasis de Santa Teresa.

       Y eso que tenían aspecto de familia normal, tirando a austera, con una juventud no precisamente boyante en los barrios de Chicago. Leyendo los dos libros que ha escrito, nadie diría que Obama se chifla por los spa de muerte y los campos de golf con bancadas de mármol de Carrara.

       No sé qué les parecerá a los estadounidenses que su primera familia vaya a instalarse en el hotel más lujoso, máscaro y más exclusivo de España, cuyas puertas no pueden cruzar ni siquiera en sueños los que tienen un buen sueldo. La exhibición del lujo es de mal gusto en tiempos de bonanza.En momentos de crisis resulta insoportable.

Los asesores de Obama, cuya fama es legendaria, no han estado muy finos esta vez

       Para los españoles es fatal que Omaba y/o Michelle conozcan la España actual a través de los jardines del Villapadierna. Pueden creer que somos riquísimos, con lo cual es posible que EEUU nos obligue a nuevos sacrificios.

         Sólo faltaba que Zapatero vaya a soplar las velas de su cumpleaños, que coincide con el de Obama el 4 de agosto, a los exclusivos salones de hotelazo. Mejor sería que le invitara a Quintos de Mora, una finca de caza que es ejemplo de austeridad comparada con Marbella, en la que se hicieron amigos Bush y Aznar. O a Doñana, donde intimaron con los Blair.

 

Michelle Obama will feel our pain in Spain but only at $2859 a night

 

 

 July 28, 2010

  "THE PAIN IN SPAIN FALLS MAINLY ON THE VAIN": QUEEN OBAMA PHARAONIC TRIP TO SPAIN!!!

    And will the First Lady feel our pain while she's staying at the $2859 a night Ritz-Carlton? Nope. Because she's reserved 30 rooms for her friends and the Secret Service. Will she be paying them from her personal account?

     After Obama declared in a July 27, 2010 interview with ABC's Elizabeth Leamy, “We’re not that far removed from what most Americans are going through," we find out that Michelle Obama has booked a very expensive vacation to Spain accompanied by "long-time family friends". The liberal media that did decide to cover it calls it a "private" vacation, but since when have the Obama's used their own money?

     The trip will not include Obama and Malia. And strangely, the trip will coincide with Obama's birthday because he will be visiting his CEO office at the auto plants he owns in Michigan and taking a trip to Chicago to attend Trinity Church with William Ayers.

      Why has Mrs. Obama decided to skip out on O's birthday? Is she getting back at him for not allowing her on the stage for his winning speech? Is she harboring some anger towards him? We may never know.

        And will the First Lady feel our pain while she's staying at the $2859 a night Ritz-Carlton? Nope. Because she's reserved 30 rooms for her friends and the Secret Service. Will she be paying them from her personal account?

      Mrs. Obama chose the place because it is one of the few in Spain that caters to children. That's appropriate because since Obama was elected, they've all been acting like kids in a candy store.

       And finally, will the First Lady be treated to a tour of the disastrous solar energy grids that have nearly bankrupted Spain and have been suspended?

     MIENTRAS EL PAIS SUFRE CON UN DESEMPLEO SOBRE EL 20% EN PARTES DEL PAIS, Y LA PEOR CRISIS ECONOMICA DESDE LA DEPRESION DE LOS AÑOS 30 GRACIAS A LAS MEDIDAS ANTI-ECONOMICAS MARXISTAS DE OBAMA, SU MAJESTAD MICHELLE SE CREE LA REENCARNACION DE LA REINA MARIA ANTONIETA DILAPIDANDO LOS DINEROS DEL SUFRIDO PUEBLO TRABAJADOR Y VIAJANDO ALREDEDOR DEL MUNDO CON SU SEQUITO REAL EN UN  ALARDE DE OBSTENTACION VERGONZANTE.

Banned
sirjohn
Mensajes: 137,146
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: ¡¡AQUI Y AHORA TREMENDO PROGRAMA LLENO DE INFORMACIONES IMPORTANTES!!!

Obama Tells Joy Behar and Liberal Media: Your job to be my 'attack dog'
Thursday, July 29, 2010 | Kristinn

Barack Obama told The View co-host Joy Behar that it was her job, and by inference that of her fellow liberals in the media, to be his "attack dog" to defend his presidency and counter the influence of conservatives in the media.

Behar, who also hosts her own primetime current events talk show on CNN's HLN channel, complained to Obama in an interview taped on Wednesday for broadcast today on ABC that he has lost control of the narrative of his presidency (via MediaBistro):

Behar: "You've really done a lot, I think. You've signed 200 plus laws since you're in office, financial reform has taken place, you've got health care, two women on the supreme court...and yet the right wing, through Fox News and other outlets, seem to be hijacking the narrative. where on your side is the narrative? Where is your attack dog to come out and tell the American people, listen, this is what we did?"

Obama: "Joy, that's your job."

Behar: "I do it! But I'm only one woman!"

Banned
sirjohn
Mensajes: 137,146
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: ¡¡AQUI Y AHORA TREMENDO PROGRAMA LLENO DE INFORMACIONES IMPORTANTES!!!

Panel hits Rangel with 13 alleged ethics charges

Charles Rangel
AP – Rep. Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., leaves his office t
o go to a vote on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, …

      WASHINGTON – House investigators accused veteran New York Rep. Charles Rangel of 13 violations of congressional ethics standards on Thursday, throwing a cloud over his four-decade political career and raising worries for fellow Democrats about the fall elections.

     The allegations — which include failure to report rental income from vacation property in the Dominican Republic and to report more than $600,000 in assets on his congressional financial disclosure statements — came as lawyers for Rangel and the House ethics committee worked on a plea deal.

     One was struck, people familiar with the talks said, but Republicans indicated it was too late.

       The deal between the lawyers will have little meaning if the committee members don't approve it, and Republicans said at the proceeding they were insisting on going forward with a trial. The panel is evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans.

      "Mr. Rangel was given multiple opportunities to settle this matter. Instead, he chose to move forward to the public trial phase," said Rep. Jo Bonner of Alabama, the senior Republican on the ethics panel

Chairman Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., has made clear that she wants the committee to be unanimous — leaving little chance for agreement without Rangel capitulating on virtually all counts.

        Many Democrats had urged Rangel to settle the case to avoid the prospect of televised hearings right before November congressional elections that will determine which party controls Congress next year.

        However, as Thursday's public airing of the charges drew nearer, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi seem resigned to the case proceeding.

      "The chips will have to fall where they may politically," she told reporters. Pursuing ethics cases against House members is "a serious responsibility that we have," she said.

       The alleged violations of House standards of conduct also include using congressional letterhead to solicit donations for a center for public service to bear Rangel's name on the New York campus of the City College of New York.


Reuters

Rangel was also accused of accepting a rent-stabilized property in Manhattan for his campaign office and initially not paying federal taxes on the Dominican Republic property.

     The ethics panel said Rangel failed to report rental income on his original tax returns for 1998 through 2006 from the Dominican Republic villa. It also said he violated federal laws in addition to House ethics rules, including the 1989 Ethics Reform Act, Postal Service laws and government service codes.

    The ethics charges, agreed upon after a two-year probe, were read in a public session of the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, as the ethics committee is formally known.

     Rangel, 80, did not attend.

     The session set the stage for a committee trial, expected to be held in September. Democrats had hoped to avoid such a public confrontation as November elections approach.

      "We live at a time when public skepticism about the institutions in our country is very high," said Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., the ethics committee chair.

      She said it had been the panel's goal "to by our actions rebuild and earn trust by the public and our colleagues."

      Republicans have been trying to turn the case into an indictment of Democratic leadership. Rangel stepped down earlier this year as chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, one of the top posts in the House.

    But Bonner told colleagues, "No one, regardless of their partisan stripes, should rejoice."

     "It is the duty of the House to punish its members for disorderly behavior. As such, this is truly a sad day," the Alabama Republican said.

   Under the tentative plea deal, it was not immediately clear how many of the 13 charges of ethical violations Rangel agreed to accept.

    It includes eight members, equally divided between Democrats and Republicans. Thus, for any deal to be accepted it must be approved by at least one Republican.

      In the frantic hours leading up to the meeting, Rangel's lawyer, Leslie Kiernan, talked to attorneys for the panel about how to avoid a trial for the 40-year veteran.

   Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas, the top Republican on the panel that will try Rangel, said that the Democrat had been "given the opportunity to negotiate a settlement during the investigation phase."

    However, he said, that phase is now over. "We are now in the trial phase," he said.

  A congressional trial could be avoided only if Rangel admitted to substantial violations, or resigned.

   Punishment could range from a report criticizing his conduct to a reprimand or censure by the House, or a vote to expel him — which is highly unlikely. Any agreement would have to be approved by Rangel and ethics committee members.

      "Sixty years ago I survived a Chinese attack in North Korea and as a result I haven't had a bad day since," Rangel told reporters earlier Thursday. "But today I have to reassess that statement."

    "I think everyone is looking forward to getting all the facts out in the open, and people will have to react once we know what we're dealing with," said Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill.

   Rangel is tied for fourth in House seniority. He's still vigorous at 80 years old.

     He had substantial influence as Ways and Means chairman. The panel handles taxes, trade, portions of health care, Medicare and Social Security.

     But he stepped down from that post in March after the ethics committee criticized him in a separate case, saying he should have known that corporate money paid for two trips to Caribbean conferences.

     Rangel had repeatedly said he looked forward to a public discussion of the current allegations. A four-member investigating panel, with separate members from the judging subcommittee, brought the charges.

     The 42-member Congressional Black Caucus has warned Democrats against a rush to judgment, and any lawmaker with a significant African-American constituency must consider whether it's worth asking Rangel to quit.

      However, some Democratic House members in close races may think it's more important to distance themselves from Rangel. They don't want to have to answer negative Republican ads about Pelosi's promise to wipe Congress clean of ethical misdeeds.

     Two Democrats didn't wait to hear the charges.

Rep. Betty Sutton of Ohio, a second-term lawmaker who received 65 percent of the vote two years ago, said Rangel needs to resign to preserve the public's trust in Congress.

   Rep. Walt Minnick of Idaho, a freshman who got 51 percent of the vote last time, called for resignation if the charges are proven.

     Congress adjourns for its August recess after this week.

___

Associated Press writers Ann Sanner and Alex Brandon contributed to this report.

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: ¡¡AQUI Y AHORA TREMENDO PROGRAMA LLENO DE INFORMACIONES IMPORTANTES!!!

Arizona officer dies in under cover drug bust, while Judge Susan Bolton looks the other way

 

 

 

July 30, 9:03 AM · Gil Guignat - Phoenix Conservative Examiner

     Do you suppose Arizona Judge Susan Bolton understands that while she is paralyzed by fear of not knowing what to do, her inaction is getting police officers killed?

      The overwhelming reason Arizona's immigration law SB 1070 needs to go into effect is that the drug dealers are hiding in the illegal immigrant masses. Police need to know who they are and need to have the option of asking  for ID documents when anyone is stopped for another infraction.

Isn't it interesting how the protesters against SB 1070 are not interested in law enforcement personnel  getting killed from the by-product of illegal immigration which is drug violence?

      Judge Bolton was oh! so concerned that illegal immigrant rights would be trampled if too many were stopped. Judge Bolton should have also added that in order to preserve those rights if law enforcement personnel was slaughtered so she could look good to Obama and company and maybe get a promotion in the process she was ok with that.

       This officer was killed on the eve of her ruling and two others were wounded. When Virginia implemented its version of SB 1070 violent crime went down 40%. Do you get it Judge Bolton? That officer may have not needed to lose his life had the law been in effect and made things safer. We are in the midst of a disastrous economy where the state of Arizona is more than a $1 billion in ...This ruling is making safety much worse at a time wehn people should be concentrating on their economic wellbeing. How can people feel safe and go about their lives when you have declared open season on Arizonans?

       Here is an idea for you judge. Why don't you go with the protesters and march hand in hand with them in a civil rights march a la 1960's? You are complicit in this officer's death and you will be complicit in future injuries to law enforcement. This is on your head! What happens when the cops stop showing up to defend us? We can hardly wait for your next ruling to keep us safe!

Banned
sirjohn
Mensajes: 137,146
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: ¡¡AQUI Y AHORA TREMENDO PROGRAMA LLENO DE INFORMACIONES IMPORTANTES!!!

 DEMOCRATAS ADMITEN QUE OBAMA HA TRAIDO MAS DIVISION QUE NINGUN OTRO PRESIDENTE

 

 

Barack Obama promised a new era of post-partisanship. In office, he's played racial politics and further split the country along class and party lines.

By PATRICK H. CADDELL AND DOUGLAS E. SCHOEN

 

WSJ 7/28/2010

 

 

    During the election campaign, Barack Obama sought to appeal to the best instincts of the electorate, to a post-partisan sentiment that he said would reinvigorate our democracy. He ran on a platform of reconciliation—of getting beyond "old labels" of right and left, red and blue states, and forging compromises based on shared values.

      President Obama's Inaugural was a hopeful day, with an estimated 1.8 million people on the National Mall celebrating the election of America's first African-American president. The level of enthusiasm, the anticipation and the promise of something better could not have been more palpable.

    And yet, it has not been realized. Not at all.

    Rather than being a unifier, Mr. Obama has divided America on the basis of race, class and partisanship. Moreover, his cynical approach to governance has encouraged his allies to pursue a similar strategy of racially divisive politics on his behalf.

The 'Beer Summit': President Barack Obama, right, and Vice President Joe Biden, left, have a beer with Harvard scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr., second from left, and Cambridge, Mass. police Sgt. James Crowley in the Rose Garden of the White House, July 30, 2009.

 
 
schoen

 

 

 By dividing America, Mr. Obama has brought our government to the brink of a crisis of legitimacy, compromising our ability to address our most important policy issues.

William McGurn discusses the Democrats' novel strategy for the fall elections.

     We say this with a heavy heart. Both of us share the president's stated vision of what America can and should be. The struggle for equal rights has animated both of our lives. Both of us were forged politically during the crucible of the civil rights movement. Having worked in the South during the civil rights movement, and on behalf of the ground-breaking elections of African-American mayors such as David Dinkins, Harold Washington and Emanuel Cleaver, we were deeply moved by Mr. Obama's election.

     The first hint that as president Mr. Obama would be willing to interject race into the political dialogue came last July, when he jumped to conclusions about the confrontation between Harvard Prof. Henry Louis "Skip" Gates and the Cambridge police.

     During a press conference, the president said that the "Cambridge police acted stupidly," and he went on to link the arrest with the "long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately."

     In truth, the Gates incident appears to have had nothing to do with race—a Cambridge review committee that investigated the incident ruled on June 30 that there was fault on both sides.

      Sen. Jon Kyl (R., Ariz.) has said the president told him in a closed-door meeting that he would not move to ssecure the border with Mexico unless and until Congress reached a breakthrough on comprehensive immigration reform. That's another indication Mr. Obama is willing to continue to play politics with hot-button issues.

       Add in the lawsuit against the Arizona immigration law and it's clear the Obama administration is willing to run the risk of dividing the American people along racial and ethnic lines to mobilize its supporters—particularly Hispanic voters, whose backing it needs in the fall midterm elections and beyond.

        As the Washington Post reported last week, two top White House strategists, speaking on condition of anonymity, have indicated that "the White House plans to use the immigration debate to punish the GOP and aggressively seek the Latino vote in 2012."

     On an issue that has gotten much less attention, but is potentially just as divisive, the Justice Department has pointedly refused to prosecute three members of the New Black Panther Party for voter intimidation at the polls on Election Day 2008.

    It is the job of the Department of Justice to protect all American voters from voter discrimination and voter intimidation—whether committed by the far right, the far left, or the New Black Panthers. It is unacceptable for the Department of Justice to continue to stonewall on this issue.

       During the 2008 presidential campaign, Mr. Obama's campaign emphasized repeatedly that his minister, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, was being unfairly stereotyped because of racially incendiary sound bites that allegedly did not reflect the totality of his views. In the Gates incident and others, Mr. Obama has resorted to similar forms of stereotyping.

       Even the former head of the Civil Rights Commission, Mary Frances Berry, acknowledged that the Obama administration has taken to polarizing America around the issue of race as a means of diverting attention away from other issues, saying: "the charge of racism is proving to be an effective strategy for Democrats. . . . Having one's opponent rebut charges of racism is far better than discussing joblessness."

     The president had a unique opportunity to focus on overarching issues of importance to whites and blacks. He has failed to address the critical challenges. He has not used his bully pulpit to emphasize the importance of racial unity and the common interest of poor whites and blacks who need training, job opportunities, and the possibility of realizing the American Dream.

       He hasn't done enough to address youth unemployment—which in the white community is 23.2% and in the black community is 39.9%.  Mr. Obama has also cynically divided the country on class lines. He has taken to playing the populist card time and time again. He bashes Wall Street and insurance companies whenever convenient to advance his programs, yet he has been eager to accept campaign contributions and negotiate with these very same banks and corporations behind closed doors in order to advance his political agenda.

      Finally, President Obama also exacerbated partisan division, and he has made it clear that he intends to demonize the Republicans and former President George W. Bush in the fall campaign. In April, the Democratic National Committee released a video in which the president directly addressed his divide-and-conquer campaign strategy, with an appeal to: "young people, African-Americans, Latinos, and women who powered our victory in 2008 [to] stand together once again."

 

       President Obama's divisive approach to governance has weakened us as a people and paralyzed our political culture. We are stronger when we debate issues and purpose, and we are all weaker when we divide by race and class. We will pay a price for this type of politics.

Mr. Caddell served as a pollster for President Jimmy Carter. Mr. Schoen, who served as a pollster for President Bill Clinton, is the author of "The Political Fix" (Henry Holt, 2010).

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: ¡¡AQUI Y AHORA TREMENDO PROGRAMA LLENO DE INFORMACIONES IMPORTANTES!!!

Charlie Rangel’s Enablers

By Michelle Malkin On July 30, 2010 In FrontPage |

       House [1] Speaker Nancy Pelosi is the world’s worst cleaning lady. How has she fulfilled her vaunted promise to “drain the swamp” and preside over the “most ethical Congress in history”? By shrugging her shoulders, downplaying the gravity of myriad ethics charges against corruptocrat Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel and waiting for the “political chips” to “fall where they may.” Imagine a custodial service that fixed toilet clogs by letting the overflowing waste and polluted waters “fall where they may.”

       At a press conference to preempt the bipartisan House ethics panel’s announcement of 13 ethics and federal regulation charges against Rangel on Thursday afternoon, Pelosi claimed to take “great pride” in her swamp-draining record. Unblinkingly, she cited the House trial against Rangel as proof that the “process” is working. But that beleaguered panel has been pathetically understaffed, has dragged its feet for two years on the Rangel case and has administered more halfhearted wrist-slaps than all the pushover parents on a season of “Nanny 911.”

          Clinging bitterly to the moral equivalence card, Pelosi carped about Bush-era GOP corruption. (Cue a chorus of “Let’s do the time warp again!”) Her lips were sealed, however, on the continuing wheeling and dealing behind the scenes between Rangel’s lobbyist-funded lawyers and the ethics panel on a deal to avoid a congressional trial.

        A full-blown public trial would thoroughly air his self-dealing, habitual bad-faith failures to report income, multiple House gift ban and solicitation ban violations, flouting of franking privilege and letterhead rules, and a fundamental “pattern of indifference or disregard for the laws, rules and regulations of the United States and House of Representatives,” as the House ethics statement of violations put it. But, hey, what about that GEORGE W. BUSH, eh, Pelosi?

      Bush-whack all you want. The Rangel stench is overwhelming. Along the way, Rangel has obstructed House investigators, failed to produce documents and refused previous settlement offers — prompting House ethics investigative subcommittee member Rep.

Jo Bonner, R-Ala., to reject the Rangel-as-victim narrative. Misfortune didn’t befall Rangel. He chose his path. While bleeding-heart lefties in the media, like The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank, mourn entrenched incumbent Rangel’s sudden fall (he “took 36 years to climb to the top, only to lose it all in an instant”), there is nothing sudden about the entitlement sclerosis that took hold of his career.

       And there is nothing ethical about the Democratic enablers who have shown their own long pattern of indifference or disregard for clean, open, transparent government.

      I remind you that in March, Speaker Mop & Glo was minimizing Rangel’s mountain of alleged transgressions by pooh-poohing that “it was a violation of the rules of the House. It was not something that jeopardized our country in any way.” GOP Rep. Mike McCaul, a member of the House ethics investigative subcommittee, begged to differ. “Credibility is what’s at stake here; the very credibility of the House itself,” he said at the hearing announcing the baker’s dozen of ethics charges. Echoing Pelosi’s nonchalance, Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters sniffed that “many members” of the House are as habitually sloppy and apathetic toward House ethics rules as Rangel — her good friend and Congressional Black Caucus ally.

    Since Day One, the identity-politics caucus that Rangel helped found has stood by his side and blamed anti-black bias for Rangel’s troubles. Rangel likened media scrutiny of his shady rent-controlled apartment deals and tax troubles to a “lynching.” CBC member Chaka Fattah, D-Pa., called it a “witch hunt.” And an unidentified, tinfoil-hatted black House Democrat told Politico: “It looks as if there is somebody out there who understands what the rules (are) and sends names to the ethics committee with the goal of going after the (CBC).”

      Never mind that the supposedly bigoted House ethics panel exonerated four CBC members of their participation in corporate-funded tax junkets to the Caribbean. When the polls are down and damning evidence keeps mounting, first yell “BUSH!” Then yell “RAAAAACIST!”

       As last-minute deal-making between Rangel and the foxes guarding the congressional henhouse continues, more and more Americans are coming to the same conclusions: House-soilers can’t be cleaners. Voters, not Washington politicians, are the ultimate ethics committee.

 

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: ¡¡AQUI Y AHORA TREMENDO PROGRAMA LLENO DE INFORMACIONES IMPORTANTES!!!

Who Does The Left Hate More Than Breitbart and Fox?
2010 July 31

Black Conservatives Running For Office

       Cedra Crenshaw of Bolingbrook, IL just wanted the best education possible for her children.  She started looking into her local school district and found that the majority of the education dollars were going to salaries and benefits for teachers and administrators, instead of students. Yet the schools were financially hurting. She kept hoping that someone would run for office and correct the situation, but no one came forward in her largely Democrat district to cut spending.

        So Crenshaw decided to run for office herself.  Her accounting background and experience as an auditor was just what her district needed. What she encountered was typical Democrat machine politics in Illinois, down and dirty. Crenshaw should have known it would not be easy. She is, after all, a black conservative in the Democrat gulag of Illinois.

    It is no surprise that the most blatant racism in America is against black conservatives, and that it comes from the Left.  How dare any minority join the Republican Party, or the Tea Party, or conservatism in general? 

 

      They will pay dearly for their independence and rejection of the left’s victimization narrative.  It will take perseverance and courage for conservative minorities to overcome the racism they will experience from the left.  Yet they are running for office in larger numbers than ever before. Ironically, the election of Barack Obama has probably influenced black conservatives to run for office more than anything. They are joining the ranks of the Tea Party and working to influence the national conversation.  The question is will the Democrat Party and leftist organizations like the NAACP continue to destroy their efforts?  It looks like the enemies of the left aren’t just Andrew Breitbart and Fox News, but any conservative minority who decides to expose the failures of the left.

     Republican Cedra Crenshaw (www.cedracrenshaw.com) is on the ballot for the State Senate in Illinois’ 43rd district.  But the Democrats almost got her kicked off the ballot, because that’s what Democrats do in Illinois to get rid of their opponents.  Barack Obama did it over and over again in his elections prior to his presidential run.  The hope is that they can force their opponents to spend money needlessly on a defense of bogus charges, and get them kicked off the ballot at the same time.  

 

       When Crenshaw’s Democratic opponent challenged her petition signatures in court, she knew she had to fight. Her signatures were valid, and she followed the rules exactly.  The judge found no irregularities whatsoever, and Crenshaw prevailed in her bid to remain on the ballot.

 

     Now the hard part begins for her.  She will have to have lawyers watching the election very closely to make sure votes are not stolen from her, because that’s what happens to conservatives here in Illinois.

        Her candidacy brings to mind another issue, which is how the Left continues to demean conservative minorities, hoping to make life so miserable for them that they will retreat into obscurity and give up their aspirations. Does that tactic sound familiar? It should, because that is a tactic used against minorities in general by racists everywhere. Progressive black leaders in our society only want respect and opportunity for progressive minorities, and they will do whatever it takes to crush the aspirations of conservative minorities.

     Will the Left sabotage Crenshaw’s candidacy, malign her character, and hurl racist attacks against her? They have done so to other conservative minorities, calling them Uncle Tom, traitors, and worse.

 

We have seen racist attacks against Clarence Thomas, Shelby Steele, Ward Connerly, Larry Elder, Thomas Sowell, Michael Steele, Condoleeza Rice, and other black conservatives.  Shelby Steele calls them the “unprotected class.” The Left has done everything in its power to elevate victimization amongst minorities instead of elevating accomplishment and success. That is how they keep their power. But Crenshaw knows better, and she will make her mark regardless of what happens in the upcoming election.

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: ¡¡AQUI Y AHORA TREMENDO PROGRAMA LLENO DE INFORMACIONES IMPORTANTES!!!

President Obama, Shamelessly and Hypocritically Lying. Again.

 
 

 by Lori Ziganto (Profile)

Sunday, August 1st 2010

 

President Obama gave an interview to CBS on Sunday, wherein he attempted to explain his stance against Arizona’s SB 1070 Immigration bill. Still no word on whether or not he’s actually read the bill yet, but based on his inane murmurings, I’d have to go with No. But, to be fair, during the interview he did display a few things that he does quite well: shameless lying and aabsolute hypocrisy. You see, President Obama had the utter gall to say that we shouldn’t demagogue nor politicize a national problem like immigration reform. No, really. My jaw dropped too and I thought to myself “could he possibly be that shameless?” Apparently, yes:

     In a CBS interview broadcast Sunday, President Obama slammed approaches to immigration reform he said “demagogue” a “national problem.”

   He also defended progress in the administration’s suit against Arizona’s SB 1070 immigration law — an action that states that the controversial measure flouts the federal government’s imperative under the ’supremacy’ clause of the constitution.

      Does the Smartest Man Alive ™ not know the meaning of the word demagogue? He is the Demagoguer In Chief, for goodness sake. And the entire Democrat party falls in demagogue-y lockstep right behind him. Incessant race card playing? Fear mongering? Sound familiar, President? That comes from you and your fellow Democrats who brand anyone who merely disagrees with you on policy - ever- as racist. You also use demagoguing in tandem with fear to politicize every issue and further your own agendas. Remember what you said about the law when first passed, Mr. President?  You tried to tell people that they’d be scooped up and whisked away, for no reason whatsoever, when out getting ice cream with their children.

        You allowed a foreign leader to demagogue, denigrate and demonize Arizona from our house floor. Democrats not only allowed it, they applauded it and gave Calderon sycophantic, grand-standing ovations. Once again proving they stand up for anything but America. And it was/is Democrats who are actually wearing demagogue jewelry in the form of Arizona bashing bracelets.

       It is Democrats, including you, Mr. President, who have made fear mongering hyperbole almost an art form. You demagogue to the point of Godwinning yourselves constantly. Plus, you know, the outright lying as contained in this statement made during your interview today:

     “What we can’t do is allow a patchwork of 50 different states, or cities or localities, where anybody wants to make a name for themselves suddenly says, ‘I’m going to be anti-immigrant, and I’m going to try to see if I can solve the problem ourself.’”

    No one is anti-immigrant. That is an outright lie. There is a difference between legal immigration and illegal immigration. You sniff haughtily, in your usual holier than thou manner, about icky people “politicizing” issues. Meanwhile, you actually lie in order to politicize. For a Harvard graduate, you don’t have a great grasp of words nor their meaning.

        This epitomizes why there truly is no having a dialogue with the left. Intellectual honesty isn’t their strong suit. Of course, this wouldn’t even be an issue if the federal government was doing its job — its primary job, in my opinion — and protecting our borders, not leaving states to resort to trying to do it themselves with far more limited resources. And then suing said States, all while gleefully demonizing them - for passing a law necessitated by the fact that the federal government themselves refused to act - and then feigning righteous indignation over “politicizing” and “demagoguery”.

     Before preaching to everyone else, I suggest you learn the meaning of the words and the accusations that you toss about willy nilly. I also suggest Hypocrite, Heal Thyself.

 

 

TIENE AGALLAS LA SALINAS Y SE RESPETA MUY POCO A SI MISMA COMO PROFESIONAL AL ATACAR A ARIZONA Y  AL PAIS DE DONDE COME... ARIZONA NO ESTA HACIENDO OTRA COSA QUE APLICAR LAS LEYES DE INMIGRACION DE ESTADOS UNIDOS DE UNA FORMA AUN MAS BENEVOLA YA QUE EN LA LEY FEDERAL TODO EXTRANJERO TIENE QUE PORTAR EN TODO MOMENTO PRUEBAS DE SU ESTADO LEGAL EN EL PAIS, MIENTRAS QUE ARIZONA SOLO LO REQUIERE SI LA PERSONA COMETE ALGUNA INFRACCION O DELITO.

 

LA SALINAS VE LA PAJA EN EL OJO AJENO CUANDO TIENE UNA GRAN VIGA EN EL PROPIO.

 

CUANDO JORGE IMPRECÓ AL SHERIFF ARPAIO SOBRE LOS PRESOS EN TIENDAS DE CAMPAÑA, ESTE LE RESPONDIÓ QUE NUESTROS SOLDADOS DUERMEN EN TIENDAS DE CAMPAÑA BAJO UN CALOR MUCHO MÁS INTENSO QUE EL DE ARIZONA Y LOS PRESOS AQUI RECIBEN MUCHO MEJOR TRATO Y ALIMENTACION QUE LOS PRESOS EN LAS CARCELES DE MEXICO.  ¿DEBEN DISFRUTAR LOS QUE VIOLAN NUESTRA SOBERANIA Y LEYES MEJOR ACOMODACIONES QUE LOS SOLDADOS QUE ARRIESGAN SUS VIDAS EN SERVICIO A LA PATRIA?  ¿PUEDE USTED COMPARAR EL TRATO QUE EL SHERIFF ARPAIO DA A LOS ILEGALES CON EL TRATO QUE RECIBEN EN MEXICO LOS CENTROAMERICANOS QUE TRATAN DE CRUZAR SU PAIS PARA ENTRAR EN U.S. EN BUSCA DEL SUEÑO AMERICANO, QUE LOS PROPIOS ILEGALES HAN CONVERTIDO EN UNA PESADILLA CON LA INSOLENCIA CON QUE RECLAMAN DERECHOS QUE NO LE PERTENECEN  Y QUE NO TIENEN EL CORAGE DE RECLAMAR EN SU PAIS?

 

BUSH Y McCAIN TRATARON DE DARLES LA AMNISTIA EN EL 2007 Y OBAMA Y LOS DEMOCRATAS LO IMPIDIERON YA QUE CONTROLABAN AMBAS CAMARAS.  SIN EMBARGO LOS HISPANOS VOTARON POR SU PERO ENEMIGO... CRIA CUERVOS, QUE TE SACARAN LOS OJOS. 

 

OBAMA LES PROMETIÓ DARLES LA AMNISTIA TAN PRONTO GANARA, CON ENORME MAYORIA EN AMBAS CAMARAS PUDO HABERSELAS DADO EN LOS PRIMEROS 100 DIAS DE SU REINO, SIN EMBARGO LOS TRAICIONÓ... 

YA HASTA LOS PROPIOS DEMOCRATAS  ADMITEN QUE OBAMA HA EXACERBADO EL ODIO RACIAL Y LA DIVISION POLITICA EN EL PAIS.

 

ASI PAGA EL DIABLO A QUIEN BIEN LE SIRVE.

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: ¡¡AQUI Y AHORA TREMENDO PROGRAMA LLENO DE INFORMACIONES IMPORTANTES!!!

Blood on Obama’s Hands

By Floyd and Mary Beth Brown On August 3, 2010 In FrontPage

        With the deaths of three additional U.S. troops on July 29, July officially became the bloodiest of the nine-year conflict in Afghanistan. The death toll for July was 63 and it captured the record as the deadliest month for Americans so far.

     We all need to understand that the increase in deaths is directly the result of Obama’s personal mismanagement of the war. The blood of our servicemen is on his hands.

         Why? Upon taking management of defense policy, the Obama administration intervened to change the rules of engagement. Ralph Peters explained it this way in the New York Post: “Unless our troops in combat are absolutely certain that no civilians are present, they’re denied artillery or air support. If any civilians appear where we meet the Taliban, our troops are to ‘break contact’ — to retreat.”

      Peters concludes, “When our own moral fecklessness murders those in uniform, it’s unforgivable. In Afghanistan, our leaders are complicit in the death of each soldier, Marine or Navy corpsman who falls because politically correct rules of engagement shield our enemies.”

        Obama dithered in adopting a new policy in Afghanistan deep into 2009. This led to criticism from even a left-wing dove like Sen. John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts. Of Obama’s indecision, Kerry said in a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, “At the very moment when our troops and our allies’ troops are sacrificing more and more, our path and our progress seem to be growing less and less clear.”

         Next came the wrongheaded announcement of our deadline for withdrawal. Obama basically told our enemies the date of our leaving; now they are emboldened by foreknowledge of our defeat.

        And who can forget the Stanley McChrystal firing and all the interruption to the chain of command and subsequent uncertainty over policy?

Now we face the Wikileaks scandal, and even this cannot focus the foreign policy team lead by Obama. Obama is downplaying the importance of this leak of thousands of classified secret documents.

      But he won’t be able to laugh off the latest allegations. We have now learned that with quick action he and his White House staff may have been able to limit the damage, but they were too incompetent to act.

      A video interview by Judge Andrew Napolitano on Fox Business News blows this scandal wide open. When asked by Judge Napolitano why he should not be held responsible for potential deaths caused by the leak, Julian Assange, the founder of Wikileaks, answered that he contacted the White House about the leaks before they were released and asked them to review them.

   The White House’s response? Nada.

     They were too busy golfing, partying with Paul McCartney and spending the summer vacationing.

     In subsequent e-mail conversations, Assange’s people clarified that they sought an administration response through The New York Times, and even The New York Times was ignored.

       This is the part of the puzzle which could explain why Obama and his supporters have been trying to downplay this leak as unimportant.

       If someone in the Obama administration had advance knowledge of this devastating leak and they did nothing to help limit the potentially fatal consequences to our soldiers and many valiant Afghani informants, Obama has every reason to downplay the leak.

      Someone in this administration has blood on their hands, and Congress must demand a full disclosure of who knew what and when. It is imperative that this scandal is investigated and not covered up.

       Ironically, on the same day these last three heroic servicemen were dying, millions of American women were busy watching Obama on “The View.” No time to manage the war, only time for golf, parties, vacations and PR.

      As Americans, we are appalled. Please stay home and do your job, Mr. Obama. Your gross incompetence is leading to needless bloodshed.

OBAMA NO SOLO ES RESPONSABLE POR PONER LA VIDA DE LOS TERRORISTAS POR ENCIMA DE LAS DE NUESTRAS TROPAS, SINO QUE SE HA MANTENIDO ¡PAGANDO $6,000 MENSUALES DE SUELDO!!! (COMO PREMIO A VESANIA) AL OFICIAL DEL EJERCITO Y TERRORISTA ISLAMICO RESPONBLE POR LA CARNICERIA DE FORT HOOD DONDE FUERON ASESINADOS A SANGRE FRIA TRECE DE NUESTROS HEROES, TERRORISTA QUE DEBIO RECIBIR UN JUICIO MILITAR SUMARIO POR TRAICION Y FUSILADO DE INMEDIATO.

A SU VEZ OBAMA, DESPUES DE DIEZ AÑOS QUE LOS SERVICIOS DE INTELIGENCIA TRATARON DE DESMEMBRAR UNA RED DE ESPIAS SOVIETICOS, LOS PUSO DE INMEDIATO EN LIBERTAD PARA COMPLACER A PUTIN QUE EL DIO COMO TOQUEN DE APRECIACION 4 ESPIAS RUSOS QUE LLEVABAN ANOS PRESOS Y QUE NO TENIAN NINGUN VALOR PARA LA INTELIGENCIA DE U.S.

NADA TIENEN QUE TEMER LOS TERRORISTAS NI LO ESPIAS DE OBAMA