¿Qué temas son más importantes para ti?

[teamuf Acero]

¿Acerca de qué temas prefieres que traten en el programa?

a) Educación

b) Salud

c) Economía

d) Política

e) temas Sociales

f) Otros

[siboneyes]

LOS PANELES DE LA MUERTE DEL OBAMACARE

Subject: San Antonio doctors'  ad

PLEASE VIEW THIS..AND SEND IT TO  FRIENDS... The Democratic Party has produced  a television ad purporting to show Rep Paul Ryan throwing grandma off the  cliff, by opposing ObamaCare. A couple of San  Antonio doctors have responded with an effective ad to counter this injustice.  See the ad produced by Drs Jane Hughes and Kris Held

http://www.youtube.com/embed/PJ-p29xEM0s

If you like  their ad, please forward widely.

[siboneyes]

CHRIS WALLACE INTERVIEW MARCO RUBIO ON  FOX 5/6/2012

Marco Rubio on FOX News Sunday - Grand Slam!!! (Vanity) May 6, 2012

I've been torn between Senator Rob Portman of Ohio and Senator Marco Rubio of Florida for the GOP Vice Presidential spot. Marco Rubio was on "FOX News Sunday With Chris Wallace" today. OMG, the dude was AWESOME!!! He did not miss a step; sharp, sensible, intelligent answers to every question. I was amazed at how smart this guy is. Don't know for sure, but, you might be able to see the interview on FOX.

[nokose]

---

teamuf ha escrito:

src="http://m0.uvnimg.com/contentroot/uol/art/systemimages/v2/Noticias/192X129_aqui_ahora_showshub.jpg" border="0" />

¿Acerca de qué temas prefieres que traten en el programa?

a) Educación

b) Salud

c) Economía

d) Política

e) temas Sociales

f) Otros

---

Los ataques recientes del gobierno de Obama contra los principios básicos de la Constitución deben ser discutidos y analizados en su programa, en mi opinión. Los fundadores de Estados Unidos no querian una sociedad en la que un ciudadano podría ser encarcelado o asesinado como el resultado de mera intuición presidencial.  Ellos deseaban una sociedad que era basada en un sistema imparcial de leyes.

También, el desencanto de los "terceros" partidos es un tema que merece atención.

[siboneyes]

IMPEACH OBAMA AND HOLDER!!!

Chaffetz to Democrats: Where   Are   Your  Guts on Fast and Furious?

By Katie Pavlich 5/10/2012

 Last night the House of Representatives passed the   Fast and Furious Accountability Amendment as part of the Commerce-Justice-Science Appropriations Act. The  amendment  passed by a vote of 381 to 41 and was sponsored by Republican  Reps. Jason  Chaffetz,  Paul Gosar and  Blake Farenthold.  Rep. Trey Gowdy wasn't a  co-sponsor,  but offered strong support for  the  amendment which prohibits the Department of  justice from spending money to cover-up  the Fast and Furious scandal.   "Covering up" includes making materially false statements, or  crafting documents that contain false or fraudulent information.

During debate on the amendment, Chaffetz called on  Democrats to step up and hold the Justice Department accountable and to demand documents requested from DOJ  about Fast and Furious be provided to Congress.

My challenge to members on both sides of the aisle is to stand up and have the integrity to say that we have a dead U.S. agent;  we  have a  department of justice that  lied to  congress. Where are the  guts in  this body to stand up and say,  "we're not going to put up  with that."  We're  going to demand   these documents be provided to the  congress.  We know  because the  inspector general within the Department of Justice has said   they have 80,000 documents,  they've  given congress about 7,000 of  those  documents. This is  the test of   principle, this is the  test of integrity,   and when you can't stand up and  take  on  your own party, that's  a lack of  guts. This congress has got  to  stand up for   itself, and demand that these  documents be  released.  I would  encourage members  on both sides of the  aisle, at the  very  least, vote for this amendment. I can't  imagine  any  reason why  anybody would deny the passage of this amendment.   We're  not  going to  allow taxpayer dollars to be used to lie  to  congress,  unfortunately   we have been lied to. That's  the  reason why we have to do  this amendment.  It's   embarrassing  that you have to even get to this point,  but,   madam chair,  Brian  Terry's family expected the integrity of --  expected,  the  integrity of this body  demands and we cannot  rest until we  get   to the bottom of that, regardless   whether it's republican or    democrat.

Chaffetz's remarks came just one day after Chairman  of  the  House Oversight Committe Darrell Issa sent a letter to  Democrat  Rep. Jason  Altmire reminding him of the  bipartisan  push for Fast and  Furious  accountability  a  year ago.

"On June 3, 2011, you and 30 fellow  House   Democrats wrote to the President 'to express [your] serious  concerns about   the  Administration's  response' to the  congressional  investigation  into Operation Fast and furious.  In your letter, you urged the President to  'instruct the  Department of Justice to  promptly provide complete  answers  to all Congressional inquiries on  the  issue.

[siboneyes]

Chaffetz to Democrats: Where   Are   Your  Guts on Fast and Furious?

By Katie Pavlich 5/10/2012

 Last night the House of Representatives passed the   Fast and Furious Accountability Amendment as part of the Commerce-Justice-Science Appropriations Act. The  amendment  passed by a vote of 381 to 41 and was sponsored by Republican  Reps. Jason  Chaffetz,  Paul Gosar and  Blake Farenthold.  Rep. Trey Gowdy wasn't a  co-sponsor,  but offered strong support for  the  amendment which prohibits the Department of  justice from spending money to cover-up  the Fast and Furious scandal.   "Covering up" includes making materially false statements, or  crafting documents that contain false or fraudulent information.

During debate on the amendment, Chaffetz called on  Democrats to step up and hold the Justice Department accountable and to demand documents requested from DOJ  about Fast and Furious be provided to Congress.

My challenge to members on both sides of the aisle is to stand up and have the integrity to say that we have a dead U.S. agent;  we  have a  department of justice that  lied to  congress. Where are the  guts in  this body to stand up and say,  "we're not going to put up  with that."  We're  going to demand   these documents be provided to the  congress.  We know  because the  inspector general within the Department of Justice has said   they have 80,000 documents,  they've  given congress about 7,000 of  those  documents. This is  the test of   principle, this is the  test of integrity,   and when you can't stand up and  take  on  your own party, that's  a lack of  guts. This congress has got  to  stand up for   itself, and demand that these  documents be  released.  I would  encourage members  on both sides of the  aisle, at the  very  least, vote for this amendment. I can't  imagine  any  reason why  anybody would deny the passage of this amendment.   We're  not  going to  allow taxpayer dollars to be used to lie  to  congress,  unfortunately   we have been lied to. That's  the  reason why we have to do  this amendment.  It's   embarrassing  that you have to even get to this point,  but,   madam chair,  Brian  Terry's family expected the integrity of --  expected,  the  integrity of this body  demands and we cannot  rest until we  get   to the bottom of that, regardless   whether it's republican or    democrat.

Chaffetz's remarks came just one day after Chairman  of  the  House Oversight Committe Darrell Issa sent a letter to  Democrat  Rep. Jason  Altmire reminding him of the  bipartisan  push for Fast and  Furious  accountability  a  year ago.

"On June 3, 2011, you and 30 fellow  House   Democrats wrote to the President 'to express [your] serious  concerns about   the  Administration's  response' to the  congressional  investigation  into Operation Fast and furious.  In your letter, you urged the President to  'instruct the  Department of Justice to  promptly provide complete  answers  to all Congressional inquiries on  the  issue.

[siboneyes]

PART 2

Eleven months later, the  Department of Justice has  failed to provide those  complete answers," the  letter read. "Given  the special interest expressed in  your prior letter, I  now write  enclosing a package of documents sent to Members of the Committee on  Oversight and Government Reform last week. This package includes a a draft  contempt report detailing the Justice Department's refusal  to   cooperate with the congressional inquiry into Fast and Furious. You will  find  the Departments' actions fail woefully short of full compliance   with a  congressional subpoena. Thank you for your continued support of  our  efforts to  fulfill our shared constitutional duty to conduct  oversight of  the Executive Branch."

Issa has given Eric Holder the option avoid  contempt charges so long as he complies with a congressional subpoena  issued back in October  2011.

President Obama has done anything but hold his  attorney general accountable for Fast and Furious. In fact, Obama has said  he has  "full  faith and confidence" in the way Holder has handled  things. Not to  mention,  Obama has threatened to veto the latest  House budget because it  doesn't include  funding to enforce DOJ's new  long gun reporting/gun  control measure. The measure was issued after DOJ used law  abiding gun shop owners in southern border states as a scape goat  for their  deadly Operation Fast and Furious and requires dealers  report the  sale of one or more semi-automatic rifles larger than a  .22-caliber to the  Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and  Firearms.

Unfortunetly, according to the Washington Examiner, the House budget  does  include a funding increase for ATF, the agency DOJ used to carry  out  gunwalking during Fast and Furious.

House appropriators are set to give the agency that   handled  Operation Fast and Furious the exact funding requested  by Obama, which  is an increase in funding since last   year.

"The legislation contains $1.2 billion for the [Bureau   of  Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives] ATF, $1 million above  fiscal  year  2012 and the same as the [president's] request," the  House  Appropriations  Committee explained last month.

Obama has threatened to veto this appropriations   bill because, among other things, it limits the gun control  authority of  ATF.

"Preventing the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and  Explosives from requiring licensed firearms dealers in four border States  o report information on the sale of multiple rifles or shotguns to  the  same person would hamper efforts to address the problem of illegal  gun  trafficking along the  Southwest Border and in Mexico," the  Executive  Office of the President said in a statement on the    legislation.

Today, Rep. Gosar, who drafted a "no confidence"  resolution against Holder that now has 108 co-sponsors, will lead  a Special Order on the  House Floor in an effort to open the Fast and  Furious  debate to the entire Congress.

The bottom line: Brian Terry is dead, Jaime Zapata is   dead, hundred if not thousands of Mexicans are dead as a result of  Fast  and Furious.  We need answers.

[siboneyes]

Sarah Palin Endorses Ted Cruz For U.S. Senate In Texas

The Huffington Post | By Ariel Edwards-Levy Posted: 05/10/2012  5:35 pm

Sarah Palin made an endorsement Thursday in the Texas Republican primary for U.S. Senate, backing the Tea Party-supported Ted Cruz, a former state solicitor general.

"We’re proud to join conservatives in Texas and throughout the nation in supporting your campaign to become the next senator from the Lone Star State," Palin wrote in response to a letter from Cruz, according to his campaign. “Your conservative principles, passionate defense of our Constitution and our free market system come at a time when these cornerstones of our freedom and prosperity are under attack. Our shared goal isn’t just to change the majority in control of the Senate, but to assure principled conservatives like you are there to fight for us.”

Cruz, who also won endorsements from Ron and Rand Paul, said he was honored to have Palin's support, calling her an inspiration to conservatives nationwide.

"She is principled and passionate and never afraid to speak truth to establishment power," he said, according to the Houston Chronicle.

Cruz's campaign manager, John Drogin, said that the endorsement gave the campaign a boost in fundraising and buzz.

"Phones are ringing, online contributions are pouring in, and supporters are more excited than ever on our social networks," he wrote in an email to Yahoo! News.

Early voting is already underway for the Texas GOP primary, which takes place May 29. Cruz's rivals include frontrunner Lt. Governor David Dewhurst, former Dallas mayor Tom Leppert and former sports commentator Craig James.

Palin has weighed in on a number of 2012 congressional races. In April, she backed Richard Mourdock, who successfully defeated Sen. Richard Lugar in the Republican primary for Indiana Senate. On Wednesday, she endorsed underdog state Sen. Deb Fischer in Nebraska's U.S. Senate race.

[diamond1763 Cristal]

NO TIENEN TEMAS IMPORTANTES BALLAN PAA

MEXICO Y METANSE DENTRO DE LA

BALASERA A DESCUBRIR LA BERDAD

DE LOS NARCOS Y POLITICOS CORRUPTOS

PERO NO AGARRAN UN TEMA Y NO LO SUELTAN

ASTA QUE ABURREN ASI COMO

EL DE LA PROSTITUTA QUE ASTA UN PROGRAMA SOLO PARA ELLA  QUE PROFESIONALISMO ES ESE

 BALLAN ABUSCAR LAS BERDADERAS HISTORIAS NO

POR QUERIAS QUE INBESTIGAN :novale:

[siboneyes]

Newsweek Calls Obama the  First  Gay  President

By Katie Pavlich

5/14/2012

It seems as if Newsweek may have jumped the shark with   its  latest cover implying President Obama isn't just a supporter of  gay  marriage,  but that he is actually gay himself.

The news-magazine, which hits stands today, is using the   shock  factor of labeling the straight, married, father-of-two President  to  draw  attention to itself.



Last week, Obama touted his pro-gay marriage stance on   his  Twitter page and on his campaign website.

And of course, the cover article is written by  Andrew   Sullivan, the same writer who heavily questioned whether Trig Palin   was  really Sarah Palin's son.

President Obama is taking full advantage of his "coming   out"  moment on gay marraige and will head to a swanky NYC fundraisier  with  gay singer Ricky Martin today.

Obama is heading to the Rubin Museum of Art in Chelsea  for  a  $5,000-a-ticket fundraiser co-hosted by the LGBT Leadership  Council and  openly  gay singer Ricky Martin. 

Ricky Martin is also an admirer and fan of Fidel Castro  and  Hugo Chavez... 

BIRDS OF A FEATHER F.CK   TOGETHER!!!

[siboneyes]

BREAKING: Democrat-Held Senate Rejects Obama's Horrific Budget, 99-0

By Guy Benson 5/16/2012

For the second consecutive year, the Democrat-controlled United States Senate has unanimously rejected President Obama's 2013 budget.  The final vote was 99-0, making the the running two-year tally 196-0.  This move follows the House of Representatives' 414-0 rebuke of the same fiscal blueprint earlier this year.  Astonishingly, not a single Senate Democrat has voted in favor of any budget for three years, even as they refuse to offer a plan of their own.  Democrats have claimed that three fig leaves mitigate this embarrassing spectacle:

(1) "The Senate has already passed a budget!" False. The Senate has not passed a budget.  It "deemed" itself a budget as part of a separate piece of legislation over the summer.  That law did not address tax policy, entitlement programs, and a slew of other items that a real budget entails.  Harry Reid's hand-picked Senate Parliamentarian has confirmed Republicans' contention that the Senate has not fulfilled its basic budgetary obligations.  This is the 1,113th day in a row that this has been the case.

(2) "Republican obstructionism!" False.  Budgets explicitly cannot be filibustered.  If Democrats introduced a budget, whipped their members, and called a vote, it would pass.  Simple as that.  Republicans couldn't do a thing to stop it.  But that would require Democrats to put their long-term plans on paper, which they've been avoiding like the plague for entirely political reasons.

(3) "This vote is a gimmick!" If Democrats want to label an up-or-down vote on a Democratic president's budget a "gimmick," they're welcome to do so.  In some ways, it's an appropriate description, given the pitiful gimmicks upon which Obama's budget relies -- even to achieve the fraudulent "savings" it claims.  Had it not been defeated by Congress 513-0, Obama's budget would have added $11 Trillion to the gross national debt.  It would literally never balance.

The Senate will now move on to vote on four separate Republican-proposed budgets, including the House-passed version.  They will all receive more votes than President Obama's brainchild, but none is expected to pass.  Stay tuned for updates...

UPDATE - The Senate has defeated the House-passed Ryan budget, 41-58.  I counted five Republicans joining Democrats in voting it down, at least one of whom voted no because it doesn't go far enough.  Democrats voted in lockstep against this budget, as they have on every proposed budget for the last three years.  Head-to-head tally: Paul Ryan 41 - Barack Obama 0

UPDATE II - The Senate has defeated Senator Pat Toomey's (R-PA) budget resolution, 42-57.  This is the seventh consecutive proposed Senate budget that has failed to attract even one Democrat vote.