- Suscribirse al "feed" RSS de este mensaje
- Marcar tema como nuevo
- Marcar tema como leído
- Permitir que este tema flote siempre en la parte superior
- Agregar a mis favoritos
- Agregar a mis suscripciones
- Página de impresión sencilla
Top 10 Public Employee Scandals.
- Marcar como nuevo
- Agregar a mis favoritos
- Agregar a mis suscripciones
- Suscribirse al "feed" RSS de este mensaje
- Destacar
- Imprimir
- Compartir
- Reportar al Moderador
el 03-04-2011 02:02 PM
Top 10 Public Employee Scandals
Most of our state and local public employees are undoubtedly upstanding citizens, yet the growing scope of government power leads some to do incredibly selfish things. Here are the Top 10 Public Employee Scandals:
1. Prince George’s County corruption: This Washington, D.C., suburb is a cesspool of corruption. County Executive Jack Johnson was recently indicted on conspiracy, extortion, and bribery charges relating to a pay-for-play scheme, taking money, trips, meals, drinks, hotel rooms, airline tickets, rounds of golf, mortgage payments, and campaign contributions from developers. Unrelated to Johnson’s scandal, Ulysses Currie—the state senator representing the Maryland county—was indicted last September for taking $245,000 in bribes. And Currie’s campaign treasurer Olivia Harris pled guilty to stealing $157,350 from Currie’s campaign account.
2. Bell , Calif. , salaries: The mayor and former city manager of Bell , Calif., along with six other city officials, were arrested last year and charged with illegally paying themselves huge salaries. Bell is a mostly Hispanic working-class town of 40,000 near Los Angeles, yet City Manager Robert Rizzo was receiving an $800,000 salary. Rizzo, booked on 53 counts of misappropriation of public funds, and the other officials were charged with taking $5.5 million from the city coffers.
3. Kickbacks for jailed kids: Former Pennsylvania juvenile court Judge Mark Ciavarella was found guilty of 12 counts of racketeering and conspiracy in February for sending youthful offenders to detention centers in exchange for $2 million in kickbacks from the builder of the for-profit facility. While the disgraced judge said the money was a “finder’s fee,” the state Supreme Court threw out thousands of juvenile convictions from Ciavarella’s court.
4. Washington, D.C., shopping spree: Harriette Walters, a tax assessments manager in Washington, D.C., was sentenced in 2009 to 78 months in prison for approving $48 million in false tax refunds, which she used to go on expensive shopping sprees and to lavish gifts on friends and family members. Walters, whose annual salary was $81,000, spent more $1.4 million at Neiman Marcus for jewelry, clothing, and designer handbags.
5. New York pension scandal: Former New York State Comptroller Alan Hevesi pleaded guilty last year to corruption charges for accepting more than $1 million in expenses, fees, and donations from a California businessman in return for allowing the businessman to earn $18 million in fees for investing $250 million of the state’s pension fund. Despite his guilty plea, Hevesi is allowed to keep his own $105,000 annual pension.
6. Philadelphia housing authority scandal: Philadelphia Housing Authority’s Executive Director Carl Greene had to step down from his $300,000-a-year job after using taxpayer dollars to throw wild parties that included belly dancers, and secretly spending $500,000 in agency money to settle four sexual harassment claims against him. Federal housing officials recently suspended millions of dollars in funding to the agency while investigators unravel the corruption.
7. New Orleans housing authority scandal: Elias Castellanos, chief financial officer of the New Orleans Housing Authority, was sentenced to four years in prison for using taxpayer money to buy a million-dollar mansion in Florida. Castellanos stole $245,217 by padding invoices and $655,710 by submitting invoices under his wife’s maiden name.
8. Crooked TSA agents: Two Transportation Security Administration agents were charged with grand larceny, possession of stolen property, and official misconduct for stealing $160,000 in cash from bags at New York’s Kennedy Airport. Davon Webb, 30, and Couman Perad, 36, who were arrested after stealing $39,000 from a single bag on Jan. 30, admitted to authorities that they swiped cash from checked bags on a regular basis.
9. Corrupt Dallas cop: Dallas policewoman Theadora Ross was arrested for stealing $250,000 in rewards meant for people making tips to a Crime Stoppers program. Her job was to evaluate the tips and select those eligible for the reward. Instead, she steered the money to a friend and split the proceeds.
10. Seattle school scam: Seattle Public Schools spent $1.8 million on a contract for work that was never done. Silas Potter Jr., who managed the district's small-business program, is being investigated for funneling money to friends and leaders of the Seattle black community, according to the Seattle Times. Investigators are trying
Re: Top 10 Public Employee Scandals.
- Marcar como nuevo
- Agregar a mis favoritos
- Agregar a mis suscripciones
- Suscribirse al "feed" RSS de este mensaje
- Destacar
- Imprimir
- Compartir
- Reportar al Moderador
el 03-10-2011 03:44 PM
Blitz! Wisconsin Taxpayers – 1, Truant Democrats – 0
By Walter Hudson On March 10, 2011 In Email,Feature,News
This is not supposed to happen. Republicans are docile, accommodating creatures. They’re supposed to kowtow to their opponent’s sense of “civility.” They’re supposed to let their opponents win. They’re supposed to do anything to avoid being called names. They’re supposed to get elected, then shift to the so-called “middle.”
Republican state senators in Wisconsin didn’t get that memo. Wednesday night, they took bold and decisive action to end weeks of juvenile political theater.
In a quick turn of events, Republican state senators in Wisconsin have successfully pushed through a provision stripping public employees of their collective bargaining rights by separating it from Gov. Scott Walker’s controversial budget bill.
The stand-alone measure passed Wednesday evening by a vote of 18-1. No Democrats were present.
In effect, the vote renders Democrats attempts to withhold the provision from the budget bill moot.
And the crowd goes wild.
The provision still needs to pass the Assembly before heading to the governor’s desk. But there is little reason to doubt that it will.
Democrats, union protesters, and the Shadow Party apparatus have responded with predictable tantrums. The audacity of their claims, while not surprising, is nonetheless awe-inspiring.
Before the sudden votes, Democratic Sens. Bob Jauch said if Republicans “chose to ram this bill through in this fashion, it will be to their political peril. They’re changing the rules. They will inflame a very frustrated public.”
Senate Democrats have been absent from the state for three weeks. Sen. Matt Miller, leader of the Senate Democrats, quickly issued the following statement after the vote:
In thirty minutes, 18 State Senators undid fifty years of civil rights in Wisconsin. Their disrespect for the people of Wisconsin and their rights is an outrage that will never be forgotten. Tonight, 18 Senate Republicans conspired to take government away from the people. Tomorrow we will join the people of Wisconsin in taking back their government.
Yeah, I know. I read it too.
A party which has deliberately subverted the people’s business for weeks has the audacity to accuse those tending to that business of disrespecting the people. A party which fled the state to avoid discharging their legal duty has the audacity to accuse those who remained of “changing the rules.”
Senate GOP leader [Scott] Fitzgerald issued his own statement:
“Enough is enough.” “The people of Wisconsin elected us to do a job. They elected us to stand up to the broken status quo, stop the constant expansion of government, balance the budget, create jobs and improve the economy. The longer the Democrats keep up this childish stunt, the longer the majority can’t act on our agenda. [...]
“We have confirmed with the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, the Legislative Council and the Legislative Reference Bureau that every item in tonight’s bill follows the letter of the law.
“The people of Wisconsin elected us to come to Madison and do a job. Just because the Senate Democrats won’t do theirs, doesn‘t mean we won’t do ours.”
I love it.
Lest we think the battle is over, realize the Left is fully intent on exacting revenge. They want the message sent to other states that challenging their monopolistic stranglehold will bring pain. In an email to supporters, MoveOn.org cried havoc.
…Wisconsin Republicans made a shocking power grab—ramming through their partisan attack on workers’ rights without a single Democrat present.
It’s shameful, unprecedented, and probably illegal. We can’t let them get away with this.
We have to recall the Republican state senators who did this.
Progressives in Wisconsin have already gathered thousands of signatures to do just that, but they need our help to get the job done. Let’s send a clear message that trying to destroy the American Dream is a surefire way to get booted from office.
Can you help raise $500,000 tonight for the recall efforts, to make sure these senators lose their seats over their outrageous actions?(…)
… After modestly changing the Governor’s budget bill, they “declared” that it was a different kind of bill that they could pass without the Democrats and passed it… Thousands of Wisconsinites have already flooded the capitol and will occupy it overnight…
Unsurprisingly, MoveOn’s rant is replete with misrepresentation. I didn’t know “the American Dream” involved coercing political contributions to help elect your own boss so you can bribe him into giving you a raise. How can you complain about Republicans passing a bill “without a single Democrat present” when those same Democrats opt not to show up? It’s not as though the Dems were kept from participating. Yet that is the flavor MoveOn adds.
Stranger still is the attempt to represent the stripping of fiscal components from a bill as some kind of arbitrary “declaration.” This coming from a political apparatus which was fully on board the Slaughter rule, ready to “deem and pass” Obamacare.
The absurdity of their arguments aside, it is important to brace for the next phase of battle. Don’t think for a second MoveOn won’t raise that money. Dispensing with “the new civility,” they will not only flood and “occupy” capitols. They’ll scratch, spit, bite, and pull hair. Wisconsin Republicans seem at last to understand. Wresting government back from a privileged few masquerading as a plebeian mass will take more than gentlemanly sparing. We’re in for a pit fight.
Wisconsin GOP senators receive death threat.
New Tone in Wisconsin: "You will be killed and your familes will also be killed."
John McCormack
Via Charlie Sykes, someone has sent the following email to Wisconsin senate Republicans threatening to kill them:
To: Sen.Kapanke; Sen.Darling; Sen.Cowles; Sen.Ellis; Sen.Fitzgerald; Sen.Galloway; Sen.Grothman; Sen.Harsdorf; Sen.Hopper; Sen.Kedzie; Sen.Lasee; Sen.Lazich; Sen.Leibham; Sen.Moulton; Sen.Olsen
Subject: Atten: Death threat!!!! Bomb!!!!
Please put your things in order because you will be killed and your familes will also be killed due to your actions in the last 8 weeks. Please explain to them that this is because if we get rid of you and your families then it will save the rights of 300,000 people and also be able to close the deficit that you have created. I hope you have a good time in hell. Read below for more information on possible scenarios in which you will die.
WE want to make this perfectly clear. Because of your actions today and in the past couple of weeks I and the group of people that are working with me have decided that we've had enough. We feel that you and the people that support the dictator have to die. We have tried many other ways of dealing with your corruption but you have taken things too far and we will not stand for it any longer. So, this is how it's going to happen: I as well as many others know where you and your family live, it's a matter of public records. We have all planned to assult you by arriving at your house and putting a nice little bullet in your head. However, we decided that we wouldn't leave it there. We also have decided that this may not be enough to send the message to you since you are so "high" on Koch and have decided that you are now going to single handedly make this a dictatorship instead of a demorcratic process. So we have also built several bombs that we have placed in various locations around the areas in which we know that you frequent. This includes, your house, your car, the state capitol, and well I won't tell you all of them because that's just no fun. Since we know that you are not smart enough to figure out why this is happening to you we have decided to make it perfectly clear to you. If you and your goonies feel that it's necessary to strip the rights of 300,000 people and ruin their lives, making them unable to feed, clothe, and provide the necessities to their families and themselves then We Will "get rid of" (in which I mean kill) you. Please understand that this does not include the heroic Rep. Senator that risked everything to go aganist what you and your goonies wanted him to do. We feel that it's worth our lives to do this, because we would be saving the lives of 300,000 people. Please make your peace with God as soon as possible and say goodbye to your loved ones we will not wait any longer. YOU WILL DIE!!!!
Let's see if the media get as worked up about this death threat.
Re: Top 10 Public Employee Scandals.
- Marcar como nuevo
- Agregar a mis favoritos
- Agregar a mis suscripciones
- Suscribirse al "feed" RSS de este mensaje
- Destacar
- Imprimir
- Compartir
- Reportar al Moderador
el 03-11-2011 01:34 PM
Collective Bargaining Has a Fiscal Impact
Capitol Confidential ^ | 3/11/2011 | Gov. Scott Walker
Madison— Today Governor Walker’s office released specific examples and new details to show how collective bargaining fiscally impacts government and how reforming collective bargaining can improve government.
A Year’s Worth of Pay for 30 Days of Work
Under the Green Bay School District’s collectively bargained Emeritus Program, teaches can retire and receive a year’s worth of salary for working only 30 days over a three year period. This is paid in addition to their already guaranteed pension and health care payouts.
At the average annual salary for a Green Bay teacher of $51,355, this amounts to a daily rate of pay of $1,711.83, or an hourly rate of $213.98. Since most retiring teachers receive higher than average salary, these amounts are, in practice, much higher.
Source: WLUK-TV, 3/3/11
Teachers Receiving Two Pensions
Due to a 1982 provision of their collective bargaining agreement, Milwaukee Public School teachers actually receive two pensions upon retirement instead of one. The contribution to the second pension is equal to 4.2% of a teacher’s salary, with the school district making 100% of the contribution, just like they do for the first pension. This extra benefit costs taxpayers more than $16 million per year.
Source: February 17, 2010 Press Release, Process of developing FY11 budget begins Milwaukee Public Schools
Almost $10,000 Per Year for Doing Nothing
While the Green Bay Emeritus Program actually requires teachers to at least show up for work, the Madison Emeritus Program doesn’t even require that. In addition to their pension payouts, retired Madison public school teachers receive annual payments of at least $9,884.18 per year for enrolling in the Emeritus Program, which requires ZERO days of work.
When this program began, 20 days of work per year were required. Through collective bargaining, the union successfully negotiated this down to zero days.
Source: Madison Teachers Inc. Website
No Volunteer Crossing Guards Allowed
A Wausau public employee union filed a grievance to prohibit a local volunteer from serving as a school crossing guard. The 86-year-old lives just two blocks away and serves everyday free of charge.
Principal Steve Miller says, "He said, you know, this gives me a reason to get up in the morning to come and help these kids in the neighborhood."
But for a local union that represents crossing guards, it isn't that simple. Representatives didn't want to go on camera but say if a crossing guard is needed, then one should be officially hired by the city.
Source: WAOW-TV, 1/27/10
$6,000 Extra for Carrying a Pager
Some state employees, due to the nature of their positions, are required to carry pagers during off-duty hours in order to respond to emergency situations. Due to the collective bargaining agreements, these employees are compensated an extra five hours of pay each week, whether they are paged or not.
For an employee earning an average salary of $50,000 per year, this requirement can cost more than $6,000 in additional compensation.
Source: 2008-09 Agreement between the State of Wisconsin and AFSCME Council 24
Arbitrator Reinstates PO.RN-Watching Teacher
A Cedarburg school teacher was reinstated by an arbitrator after being fired for viewing pornography on a school computer. The school district ultimately succeeded in terminating the teacher only after taking the case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court at great cost to the taxpayers.
Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 8/23/08
‘Outstanding First Year Teacher’ Laid Off
Milwaukee Public Schools teacher Megan Sampson was laid off less than one week after being named Outstanding First Year Teacher by the Wisconsin Council of English Teachers. She lost her job because the collective bargaining agreement requires layoffs to be made based on seniority rather than merit.
Informed that her union had rejected a lower-cost health care plan, that still would have required zero contribution from teachers, Sampson said, “Given the opportunity, of course I would switch to a different plan to save my job, or the jobs of 10 other teachers.
Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, 6/14/10
Union Opposes Cost-Saving Lawn Mowing Program
As a cost cutting measure, Racine County began using county inmates to cut the grass in medians and right-of-ways at no cost to the taxpayers. A county employee union filed a grievance indicating it was the right of government workers to cut the grass, even though it would cost the taxpayers dramatically more.
Source: Racine Journal Times, 5/12/10
The $150,000 Bus Driver
In 2009, the City of Madison’s highest paid employee was a bus driver who earned $159,258, including $109,892 in overtime, guaranteed by a collective bargaining agreement. In total, seven City of Madison bus drivers made more than $100,000 per year in 2009.
"That's the (drivers') contract," said Transit and Parking Commission Chairman Gary Poulson.
Source: Wisconsin State Journal, 2/7/10
$150,000 Correctional Officers
Correctional Officer collective bargaining agreements allow officers a practice known as “sick leave stacking.” Officers can call in sick for a shift, receiving 8 hours of sick pay, and then are allowed to work the very next shift, earning time-and-a-half for overtime. This results in the officer receiving 2.5 times his or her rate of pay, while still only working 8 hours.
In part because of these practices, 13 correctional officers made more than $100,000 in 2009, despite earning base wages of less than $60,000 per year. The officers received an average of $66,000 in overtime pay for an average annual salary of more than $123,000 with the highest paid receiving $151,181.
Source: Department of Corrections
Previously the Governor’s office released these examples of the fiscal impact of collective bargaining:
Paid-Time off for Union Activities In Milwaukee County alone, because the union collectively bargained for paid time off, fourteen employees receive salary and benefits for doing union business. Of the fourteen, three are on full-time release for union business. Milwaukee County spent over $170,000 in salary alone for these employees to only participate in union activities such as collective bargaining.
Surrender of Management Rights
Because of collecting bargaining, unions have included provisions in employee contracts that have a direct fiscal impact such as not allowing management to schedule workers based on operational needs and requiring notice and approval by the union prior to scheduling changes. As County Executive Walker attempted to reduce work hours based on budget pressures and workload requirements by instituting a 35 hour work week to avoid layoffs, which the union opposed. Additionally, government cannot explore privatization of functions that could save taxpayers money.
WEA Trust
Currently many school districts participate in WEA trust because WEAC collectively bargains to get as many school districts across the state to participate in this union run health insurance plan as possible. Union leadership benefits from members participating in this plan. If school districts enrolled in the state employee health plan, it would save school districts up to $68 million per year. Beyond that if school districts had the flexibility to look for health insurance coverage outside of WEA trust or the state plan, additional savings would likely be realized.
Viagra for Teachers
The Milwaukee Teachers Education Association (MTEA) tried to use a policy established by collective bargaining to obtain health insurance coverage that specifically paid for Viagra. Cost to taxpayers is $786,000 a year.
Unrealistic Overtime Provisions
On a state level, the Department of Corrections allows correctional workers who call in sick to collect overtime if they work a shift on the exact same day. The specific provision that allows this to happen was collectively bargained for in their contract. Cost to taxpayers $4.8 million.
Re: Top 10 Public Employee Scandals.
- Marcar como nuevo
- Agregar a mis favoritos
- Agregar a mis suscripciones
- Suscribirse al "feed" RSS de este mensaje
- Destacar
- Imprimir
- Compartir
- Reportar al Moderador
el 03-12-2011 09:36 AM
Top 10 Ugly Moments in the Wisconsin Union Battle
From the time that Wisconsin union members began protesting until the Republicans outmaneuvered absent Democratic lawmakers by stripping state workers of their collective bargaining rights, union supporters went unhinged as Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker sought to restore fiscal sanity by reining in lucrative benefits to public employees. Here are the Top 10 Ugly Moments in the Wisconsin Union Battle.
1. Fleeing the state: Fourteen Democratic Wisconsin state senators dealt a blow to democracy by fleeing the state to avoid a vote on the union reform measure. For three weeks, they abdicated their responsibility to do the job they were elected to do. In November, Wisconsin voters elected a GOP governor and large Republican majorities in the statehouse. As President Obama once said: “Elections have consequences.”
2. Nasty signs: The mainstream media was in a tizzy about signs at Tea Party rallies that pictured Obama with a Hitler mustache, but there was no similar outrage about the intemperate signs at the Wisconsin protests. Here is a sampling: “Hitler Outlawed Unions Too,” “Scott Walker = Adolf Hitler,” and “Walker Terrorizes Families.”
3. Damage to capitol: The state capitol in Madison sustained $7.5 million in damage from the tens of thousands of protesters gathered to voice opposition to the union reform vote. Most of the damage came from tape used to attach signs and placards to the marble walls inside the capitol rotunda. When the Republicans finally passed the collective bargaining measure, mobs of protesters broke into the state capitol, climbing through windows and creating further damage.
4. Fake doctor’s notes: It was bad enough when schoolteachers abandoned their students in already underachieving schools in order to protect their pension benefits, but they compounded the sin by excusing their absences with fake doctor’s notes handed out at protests.
5. Town hall shoutdown: Rep. James Sensenbrenner and state Sen. Leah Vukmir had to end a town hall meeting in Wauwatosa after screaming protesters kept interrupting the event. Pro-union hecklers continually shouted during the proceedings and chanted “Shame” as the Republican lawmakers exited the meeting.
6. SEIU scuffle: The owner of the Easy Street Cafe in Madison called 911 when a group of union protesters, led by members of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) Local 1199, stormed his restaurant and verbally accosted seven Republican state senators who were sharing a meal after a vote at the capitol. The group of about 10 people chanted and shouted obscenities at the legislators. When asked to leave by the owner, they refused and got into a scuffle with the restaurant staff.
7. FreedomWorks scuffle: Unions protesters—including members of SEIU, NEA, AFSCME, CWA, and the Teamsters—descended upon the Washington, D.C, offices of FreedomWorks, a pro-Tea Party organization that has been outspoken in favor of Gov. Walker’s union-reform measures. One union member took a video camera from FreedomWorks staffer Tabitha Hale, threw it to the ground and then hit her with his protest sign, which said, “CWA: Taking a Stand for Justice.”
8. “Get bloody”: Apparently Rep. Mike Capuano (D.-Mass.) never got the message after the Tucson shootings that political speech containing violent references was inappropriate. At a Boston rally in solidarity with the Wisconsin union protests, Capuano told the crowd: “I am proud to be here with people who understand that it’s more than just sending an e-mail to get you going. Every once in a while you need to get out on the streets and get a little bloody when necessary."
9. “You are [expletive] dead”: After a vote on union reform that ended a 60-hour Democratic filibuster in the Wisconsin State Assembly, state Rep. Gordon Hintz turned to Republican state Rep. Michelle Litjens and said, “You are [expletive] dead.” Litjens later told radio talk show host Laura Ingraham that Democrats were “throwing fits on a regular basis, looking like a group of toddlers throwing a temper tantrum.”
10. Michael Moore rants: Director Michael Moore, who has made millions with his left-wing movie screeds, is using the Wisconsin controversy to stoke class warfare. He said that private wealth is a “national resource” that belongs to all the people, called for jailing the rich, and wants a national “student walkout” in response to the Wisconsin union vote.
| HUMAN EVENTS is the news source President Reagan called his "favorite newspaper" and we still hold high the Reaganesque principles of free enterprise, limited government and, above all, a staunch, unwavering defense of American freedom. |
LA VERDAD ES CRUEL, PERO HACE LIBRE A QUIEN LE AMA... SIN EMBARGO, HAY QUIENES ANTE LAS VERDADES REACCIONAN COMO UN TORO DE MIURA CUANDO LE PONEN LAS BANDERILLAS.
Hillary's close adviser caught in Libya scandal..
- Marcar como nuevo
- Agregar a mis favoritos
- Agregar a mis suscripciones
- Suscribirse al "feed" RSS de este mensaje
- Destacar
- Imprimir
- Compartir
- Reportar al Moderador
el 03-12-2011 02:30 PM
Hillary's close adviser caught in Libya scandal
Look what State Department gal was doing for Moammar Gadhafi
March 10, 2011
By Aaron Klein
WorldNetDaily
![]() Anne-Marie Slaughter |
One of Hillary Clinton's closest advisers traveled to Libya on the dime of a controversial group that was paid by Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi to enhance the strongman's public image in the U.S., WND has learned.
Anne-Marie Slaughter was considered one of the most influential officials at the State Department until she abruptly departed last month. She served as State's director of policy and planning, where she spearheading major initiatives for Clinton.
WND has learned Slaughter, who continues to advise both Clinton and the State Department, also has been listed as "official talent" for Monitor Group, the Gadhafi-paid organization that has come under fire in recent days for sending influential U.S. citizens on trips to Libya as part of an imaging effort for the Libyan dictator.
Monitor Group's project for Gadhafi was officially called "The Project to Enhance the Public Image of Libya and Moammar Gadhafi."
The group's official summary memo of the project, obtained by WND, says Monitor Group has also been in discussion with philanthropist George Soros about ways to "advocate on Libya's behalf."
Michael Goldberg, Monitor's public relations representative, refused to respond to WND inquiries about Slaughter's relationship with his organization.
Instead, he sent a terse e-mail with an official statement that Monitor Group was "actively involved in Libya from 2006 to 2008."
The statement also explained the group sent "leaders representing a broad array of perspectives" to Libya to meet Gadhafi.
"There is no other comment available at this time," Goldberg told WND.
Slaughter, who has been referred to as one of Clinton's closest advisers, told WND she was never an employee of Monitor, and while she accepted travel expenses for the April 2007 trip, she declined to be paid a consulting fee.
She said she was aware that Monitor was being paid by the Libyan government, but her understanding was that it was for consulting regarding economic and political reforms.
"The particular program regarding bringing public intellectuals to Libya was described as part of reducing Libya's international isolation by exposing leaders to a range of ideas," she explained in an e-mail reponse. "As far as I know, that is what the State Department understood as well."
On her Twitter page, she wrote of her visit to Libya through Monitor Group: "Neither I nor my husband were paid anything other than travel expenses; State Dept approved trip."
She confirmed, "I traveled to Tripoli once on trip paid for by Monitor Consulting – took no other payment of any kind."
Slaughter is listed in Monitor Group literature obtained by WND as official "Monitor Talent."
Her profile page on Monitor Talent's website has been taken down, but the URL is still accessible. Also, the profile is still available on Internet archives.
In Monitor Group's summary memo of its imaging work for Gadhafi, Slaughter is listed as having traveled to Libya on the group's behalf from April 29 to May 3, 2007.
She went with her husband, Andrew Moravcsik, a Princeton political science professor.
According to the memo, Slaughter did not meet Gadhafi on the visit.
At the time, Slaughter was dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and was an adviser to then-presidential candidate Barack Obama.
Continued the Monitor summary: "Slaughter and Moravcsik are currently on sabbatical in Shanghai. They have indicated to Monitor that they have discussed their visit to Libya with senior Chinese officials. Slaughter and Moravcsik have indicated their willingness to return to Libya."
Working to present Gadhafi as 'thinker, intellectual'
Monitor was reportedly paid by the Government of Libya $250,000 a month along with an open expense account that would not total more than $2.5 million, apparently including travel for those sent to visit the country.
The Monitor summary memo says the group worked on behalf of Libya to "to enhance international understanding and appreciation of Libya and the contribution it has made and may continue to make to its region and to the world."
Also, Monitor says it worked to present Gadhafi "as a thinker and intellectual, independent of his more widely known and very public persona as the Leader of the Revolution in Libya."
To that affect, Monitor says it sent Slaughter and others to introduce to Libya "important international figures that will influence other nations' policies towards the country and make a contribution to the economic development of the country."
"Monitor anticipated that, by visiting Libya, these figures would become more informed about the country, develop a more sensitive understanding of the challenges that it is striving to overcome, as well as become part of a network building bridges between Libya and the rest of the world," relates the memo.
Other "important international figures" sent to Libya by Monitor include Richard Perle, former assistant secretary of defense; sociologist Anthony Giddens; Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Nicholas Negroponet; Middle East and Islam historian Bernard Lewis; Joseph Nye, professor at the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University; and Harvard professor Robert Putnam.
Slaughter proposed new 'League of Nations'
Slaughter, meanwhile, departed her pposition at the State Deparment last month as the unrest in the Middle East began. She has since returned to Princeton.
She wrote in a farewell letter last month that she will continue serving as a consultant to the State Department's Policy Planning bureau.
She reportedly continues to advise Clinton, who reportedly threw Slaughter a farewell party when she departed last month.
At State, Slaughter took the lead in sponsoring activist-centered projects in Iran, Syria and Egypt. She also oversaw a new and sweeping strategic blueprint known as the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, or QDDR, which establishes priorities over a four-year horizon.
While at Princeton in 2006, she proposed a new League of Nations that she called a "Concert of Democracies." Under her plan, which was included in the final report of the Princeton Project, a comprehensive review of national security, members of the alliance would have to be real democracies that held regular multiparty elections.
The group's purpose would purportedly be to work within existing global institutions such as the United Nations; but in the event that those fail, to provide a framework "for organizing and legitimizing international interventions, including the use of military force."
Slaughter has been a vocal advocate of viewing the world through a network lens. Most recently, in a recent article in the influential Foreign Affairs magazine, entitled "America's Edge: Power in the Networked Century," she argues that America's best future lies in positioning itself as the world's most networked nation, the hub of information, ideas and resources flowing though the global economy.
Slaughter previously taught alongside Obama at the University of Chicago Law School from 1989 to 1994.
She has worked on the Council of Foreign Relation's Taskforce on U.S.-EU Policy and has addressed the Soros-funded Center for American Progress.
In recent days she has been quoted in the media saying Obama may need to act against Gadhafi's regime, which has been accused of massacres to suppress ongoing revolts.
"We are going to see evidence of extraordinary brutality," she told ABC News. "We're already seeing it in terms of just mowing down civilians. But I think this is not going to be something that a president is going to want to have on his conscience.
During her sabbatical in China that began in 2007, she wrote a brief series of articles for the New York Times.
"My husband and I have just relocated to Shanghai for ten months to put our two sons, aged 8 and 10, in school here to learn as much Mandarin as possible and to get a feel for Asia," she wrote.
With research by Brenda J. Elliott


