Responder
¡Bienvenido! Para que puedas participar, intercambiar mensajes privados, subir fotos, dar kudos y ser parte de las conversaciones necesitas estar ingresado en los Foros. | Ingresa | Regístrate Gratis
Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009
0 Kudos

LAS RAICES DEL RADICALISMO MARXISTA Y RACISTA DE OBAMA

Another Piece of  Obama’s Radical  Puzzle

By Arnold Ahlert On March 8, 2012  n Daily  Mailer,FrontPage

 

Much remains unknown about Barack Obama’s radical past –  which the president has gone to great lengths to conceal from the   American   people.  Obama hasn’t succeeded in  covering  every trail, of  course,  as works such as David  Horowitz’s  “Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution:  The   Alinsky  Modeland Stanley Kurtz’s  “Radical-in-Chiefhave    shown. Indeed, both those texts  have powerfully exposed   the  deceptive nature of our current  president and the  socialist/Marxist  associations  he has  managed to keep from the  public.

Yesterday, another     window revealing the president’s radical past was opened. A  video released  by    Breitbart.com captured Obama leading a 1991 protest on behalf of  Harvard  Law’s Derrick Bell, described  by some as the “Rev. Jeremiah Wright of   the  academic  world.”

“Open up your hearts  and   your  minds to the words of professor Derrick  Bell,”Obama  urged  during the protest — which was  organized because of  Bell’s anger  that Harvard  denied tenure  to a black female professor,  Regina Austin, at  a time when  only  three of the law school’s  professors were black and only   five were women. Bell  told Harvard  that “until a woman of color is  offered  and accepted a  tenured  pposition on this faculty,” he  would take a leave  of absence. He   launched a hunger strike to  dramatize his point.  Considering Bell’s  radical  worldview,  Obama’s enthusiastic support of this  campaign and  his exhortation  to  the crowd to embrace Bell’s philosophy is  quite   revealing.

Derrick Bell, who died last year at the age of 80, is credited with pioneering a concept called “critical race theory.” The theory maintains that the legal system of  the   United  States is inherently biased against blacks and  other  minorities  because it was  built on an ingrained white  point of view.  Thus, it is  necessary, as he argued  in many  books and lectures, that  the life  experiences of black people and  other  minorities be  considered in hiring  decisions and the  application of law.

For Bell, racism was both  a pervasive  and permanent aspect of American life. This belief led him to throw his support behind a  journal entitled Race   Traitor, whose  editors stated  that “the key to solving the social problems of  our age is to abolish the  white race, which means no more and no  less than  abolishing the  privileges of white skin.”

 

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: LAS RAICES DEL RADICALISMO MARXISTA Y RACISTA DE OBAMA

PART 2

Furthermore, Bell believed this “institutional racism” conferred upon  oppressed minorities both the right and the duty to decide for themselves what laws are valid and worth observing. As for law itself,  critical race theory also promotes the use of storytelling in law  review articles. In  many of his writings,  and in defiance of accepted legal scholarship, Bell placed legal and social commentary into the mouths of invented characters to better reflect the “oral traditions” of black experience.

Yet  Bell’s story-telling sometimes bordered on the repugnant. In 1992, Bell wrote a  short story called “The Space Traders” about a dystopian society of depleted  resources  and polluted air, where most blacks are walled off   from the rest of society and kept under armed guard. Aliens  from  outer space  descend from the heavens and  offer to solve all of America’s problems if  the country sells all of its  blacks  to them.  A vote is held and 70 percent of the nation  agrees to hand over black Americans “in chains, half-naked, while white men with guns look on, allowing no chance of escape” to the space beings.

In the story Bell also   demonstrates his disdain for American Jews, who oppose the trade and organize an Anne Frank Committee to stop it — not  because Jews empathize with victimized blacks, but because,  Bell writes, “in  the absence of  blacks, Jews could become the  scapegoats.” Such a  depiction,  critics have noted,  was a scarcely veiled disparagement  of the motives of American Jews, who  were  highly active in the civil  rights movement.  Furthermore,  in their book “Beyond  All Reason,” liberal law professors Daniel A. Farber and Suzanna Sherry note that making Anne Frank —  “as close to a saint as Jews have” — the symbol of Jewish hypocrisy  is exceedingly insensitive and observed that  aJewish  professor who invoked the name of Rosa Parks so derisively would be bitterly condemned–and rightly so.”

In his review of that book, Ninth Circuit Court Judge Alex Kozinski reveals  where the “radical  multiculturalism” espoused by Bell and others leads. “When I was a law student a  quarter of a century ago, we were  taught that  cases usually turned not on what  the law is, not  on what the  Constitution says,  but on the predilections of the judge making the  decision. That view was on the fringe then but is  now widely held.” He notes the consequences of that radicalism. “Traditional liberals  in  law schools all over the country  are shaking their heads, wondering what hit  them. Whereas 10 years ago  one  might have had a  fruitful discussion with faculty  members and students about justice,  equality, freedom, responsibility and  merit,  such  Enlightenment  concepts are now considered a bit  quaint and a bit  dated–like  stale   granola.”

Farber and Sherry  echo that contention, noting that radical multiculturalist law  school students “have taken an ax to the foundations of traditional  academic   dialogue–things like  objectivity, truth, merit,  fairness and polite   discourse. For the radical legal  thinkers,  all these are tools that   straight white males use to oppress those  who are not.”

Bell spent his  entire academic  career advancing this agenda, even going so far as to condemn  black professors  who took a more moderate stance on affirmative action as  traitors to the  black  race who “look  black but  think white.”

 

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: LAS RAICES DEL RADICALISMO MARXISTA Y RACISTA DE OBAMA

PART 3

Obama & Rev. Wright by fourbyfourblazer

Obama's espiritual   and    political  mentor, Rev. Wright,

All this raises the question: what does   the   president  believe? Another piece of the puzzle  reveals  that Derrick Bell had a relationship  with Mr.  Obama’s former  religious mentor, Rev. Jeremiah Wright. In  2008, despite  being  aware of Wright’s rants blasting America as a racist nation, Bell  referred  to him as “one of the  foremost  preachers in  the  country who has done great  work  in the Chicago area  where he has  built  a most  impressive church for a very large   congregation.” Why would  Bell  say that? Chances are it’s because the “black   liberation  theology” espoused by Wright marries itself seamlessly to critical  race theory in  that it too centers around the black struggle  for  liberation from the omnipresence of white  racism  and oppression.

Furthermore,  black  liberation theology’s chief architect and Rev.  Wright’s mentor, James  Cone, argues that Jesus Christ himself must have been  black because “either God is for black  people in   their fight  for liberation and against the white  oppressors, or he is not.” Mr. Obama spent 20 years attending  Cone-protégé  Wright’s church. Is it possible that one can attend a church for 20 years and not be aware of the theology that animates  it? One is left to wonder if the president is aware  of James Cone’s   incendiary statement in which he asserts  that

Black theology refuses  to  accept a God who is not identified totally with the  goals of the  black community. If  God is not for us and  against white  people, then  he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The  task of black theology is to  kill Gods who do not belong to the black    community.

Despite  this odious ideology, Derrick Bell  was critical of the   president’s abandonment of  Wright:

Sen. Obama, his  campaign threatened by Rev. Wright’s sermons–or  sermon snippets–played over and over  again, has spoken out about  racial  difference and anger and the need  to get   beyond it in  order to  address effectively the serious problems that  face us all.  But like the politicians we discussed  who avoid the  tough  issues, Obama  has chosen to condemn rather than acknowledge the  truth in Rev. Wright’s sermons.  He does so while  appropriately  refusing to  end  his relationship  with Wright who  brought him  to  Christianity.

In other words, the most  radical  leftist president in the history of the  republic was insufficiently radical for Bell — the man Barack  Obama then  referred to as the “Rosa Parks  of  legal education.”

 

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: LAS RAICES DEL RADICALISMO MARXISTA Y RACISTA DE OBAMA

PART 4

Early on Wednesday, Buzzfeed’s Ben Smith  announced on Twitter that video researcher  Andrew  Kaczynski  had released “the  mysterious  Harvard/Obama/race  video that the Breitbart folks  have been  talking  about.” Kaczynski claims the video was “licensed from a Boston   television station.” Breitbart.com noted that the video had been “selectively edited either by the Boston television station or by Buzzfeed  itself” and that  it would continue releasing “additional footage that has  been hidden by Obama’s allies in the  mainstream  media and academia.” The  additional footage  was featured on Fox  News’ “Sean Hannity   Show.”

Edited out of the original tape was Barack Obama embracing professor Bell.   Furthermore, Harvard Law Professor  Charles Ogletree admitted  that he had a copy of the tape, but kept it under wraps during  the 2008  presidential  election. “Of course, we  hid  this  throughout the 2008  campaign,” said  Olgetree  laughing. “I  don’t care if they find it now.”

It is the contempt of people  like Charles Ogletree and others for the peoples’ right  to know that has been  instrumental in helping this   president maintain a  lockdown  on critical periods  of his  life.  His above associations, as well as his ties to  domestic terrorists  Bill Ayers and Bernadine  Dohrn, his long relationship with ACORN, his adoration  of the  Alinsky method and the  rest  of his radical past — so amply exposed by Kurtz, Horowitz   and  others have  all been derisively dismissed as  irrelevant,   right-wing   hysteria, or racist.

The selective editing of this tape is yet  another  example of the leftist media’s determination to  shape the news  rather than  report it. Their other egregious tactic,  aka calculated errors of omission, is epitomized by the Los  Angeles  Times’ refusal to release another video   of Obama.  It is a tape of the president attending  a party  and  praising its guest of honor–Rashid Khalidi,  rabid  Israel-hater  and  former  spokesman for terrorist  godfather  Yasser Arafat. The Times, an  ostensiblenews  organization, has been sitting on that  video for nine  years.

The efforts of  Breitbart and the crew now carrying on his legacy, stand  in stark contrast  to  those who  would aid  and abet this  journalistic malfeasance.  They  deserve great  credit for doing  what  media organizations  are supposed  to do: make news   available, regardless of whose   interests are  undermined or  enhanced in the   process.

As for the president, whether or not his support of yet another America-despising radical accrues to  his detriment  remains  to be  seen. Obama acolytes will no doubt  dismiss this tape as inconsequential, or possibly  the politics  of youthful exuberance  long  since abandoned. Yet at some   point, the preponderance of  evidence of this president’s true views  and  intentions for the country may reach critical mass.

Thoughtful  Americans should  hope it occurs before  election day.

 

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: LAS RAICES DEL RADICALISMO MARXISTA Y RACISTA DE OBAMA

OBAMA’S COMMUNION WITH DERRICK  BELL’S  RACISM.



Katie Pavlich 3/9/2012

Wonder why President Obama is a master at playing the  platinum  race card? He learned how from early life mentors. Yesterday we brought you the video of now President Obama telling Harvard students, in front of news  cameras, to “open your hearts and open  your minds to the words of Professor Derrick Bell.”  Now, another video explains  what exactly “the words of Professor Derrick Bell” are.  “I live to harass white  folks.”

But the hate doesn’t stop there.  Who does Bell think is good at upsetting, “a hell of a lot of white  people,” and a “great hero for the people? Louis

Farrakhan.

Obama   embraces racist, Jew hating professor Derrick   Bell

So another radical named Derrick Bell was a  big time  pal  of Obama. Who was Derrick Bell? He’s dead now, but he was a professor  of Law at  Harvard University. After leaving Harvard in 1992, he  Bell wrote a  racialist, antisemitic essay called “The Space Traders” in  1994.  HBO, which currently employs misogynist “comedian” Bill  Maher, decided to turn  this loony essay into a documentary back in the  1990s. The essay was about space  aliens coming to earth. Whites would “trade” blacks to the space aliens for gold  to pay off the national debt.  Bell said Jews would just stand by and watch. Charles Ogletree, Barack  Obama’s mentor said “We hid this throughout the  2008 campaign.” This  proves yet again how corrupt the media  is.

Derrick Bell also says that  Jews would only help blacks for a sense of self-preservation. Bell also called Anne Frank “the symbol of Jewish  hypocrisy.”

So Obama was best buds with yet another anti-semite tied to Jeremiah Wright. But remember, he has Israel’s back right? Obama has Israel’s back alright. A knife in it.  Obama’s War on Jews continues.

The Racist Ravings of   Derrick   Bell

John Perazzo  

Derrick Bell predicted  that eventually America would witness the rise of  charismatic new  black  leaders who, in the interests of retribution, would “urge that instead of  [African Americans] killing each other, they should go out in gangs and kill a whole lot  of white people.”[10] Presumably this was some of the  lofty “scholarship” that so impressed  Barack Obama.

Bell   endorsed  a journal called Race Traitor, whose stated aim is “to  abolish  the white race,  which  means no more and no less than  abolishing the  privileges of the  white   skin.”

So  this was Derrick Bell, the man whom Barack Obama feted on that 1991 day at Harvard, just four years before  Obama was to launchh his own political career in the home of  two  America-hating Marxists terrorists in Chicago—Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

Derrick Bell isdescribed as the “Rev.Jeremiah Wright of the academic  world.”

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: LAS RAICES DEL RADICALISMO MARXISTA Y RACISTA DE OBAMA

Derrick Bell in 1994: ‘Jewish Neoconservative Racists’

John Podhoretz 03.09.2012

 

“While these guys talk a lot, they don’t do anything. The new crop of leaders are going to be a lot more dangerous and radical, and the next phase will probably be led by charismatic individuals, maybe teenagers, who urge that instead of killing each other, they should go out in gangs and kill a whole lot of white people.”

The controversy over the videotape of Harvard Law School student Barack Obama speaking in support of his professor Derrick Bell during Bell’s one-man 1990 uprising against the law school’s failure or refusal to hire a black woman as a professor has caused a predictable back-and-forth about what it might mean for Obama to have a favorable view of Bell. Michael Powell of the New York Times reflected conventional opinion in liberal media circles when he tweeted: “Derrick Bell, Radical? We’re to pretend our history cleansed? He fought 4 Civil Rights in Mississippi.”

It is incumbent on Powell and others, if they want to get in on the conversation about Bell, to explain what on earth is mainstream about comments he made in an eye-opening New York Observer interview published on October 10, 1994, that is not available online. Among other remarks, Bell denounced Henry Louis (Skip) Gates for writing a New York Times op-ed condemning black anti-Semitism:

I was furious. Even if everything he said was true, it was inexcusable not to mention what might have motivated blacks to feel this way, and to fail to talk about all the Jewish neoconservative racists who are undermining blacks in every way they can.

Bell went on to say, “Now, that wouldn’t excuse anti-Semitism, which is awful, but it would at least provide a context for this anger…”

It might seem nice of Bell to acknowledge the awfulness of anti-Semitism, but he didn’t mean it. The very same interview began as follows: “We should really appreciate the Louis Farrakhans and the Khalid Muhammads while we’ve got them.” Khalid Muhammad was Farrakhan’s right hand, who made a name for himself referring to Jews as, among many other things, “bloodsuckers” whose “father was the devil.” As for Farrakhan, if you need a refresher course in his vileness, look here.

Why exactly were we supposed to appreciate them? Quoth Bell: “While these guys talk a lot, they don’t do anything. The new crop of leaders are going to be a lot more dangerous and radical, and the next phase will probably be led by charismatic individuals, maybe teenagers, who urge that instead of killing each other, they should go out in gangs and kill a whole lot of white people.”

Note how he seemed to relish this prospect even as he tut-tutted it. Note also how almost unimaginably wrong he was. For no marauding gangs of black teenagers went around killing white people after he spoke; in fact, the ongoing crime drop that followed his words had its most remarkable impact in black communities, where the number of murders fell, by some counts, as much as 80 percent over the decade that followed.

And of course, 18 years after he spoke these words, a black man who gave him a nice hug back in 1990 was elected president of the United States.

Bell, in the same interview: “Blacks will simply never gain full equality in this country.”

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: LAS RAICES DEL RADICALISMO MARXISTA Y RACISTA DE OBAMA

Obama's 2% Lie (Obama is a 100% walking lie)

by Gerri Willis | February 27, 2012

Gas prices shot up 18 cents on average nationwide over the past two weeks, according to the latest Lundberg survey.

That puts the average cost of regular gas at $3.69 a gallon. Of course, many of you around the country are already paying over $4.

President Obama, members of his administration, Democrats in Congress, and his allies on the left all make the same case: we can’t “drill our way” out of this problem.

They say we use a quarter of the world’s oil, but only have 2% of the world’s oil reserves. So, do the math. They say it’s impossible, but here’s how he gets to that mythical 2%.

For simplicity, we’ll call it Obama’s big oil lie because that’s what it is.

They’re only counting proven oil reserves.

The truth is that 2% oil reserves figure is whatever the government says it is.

Here’s the official definition from the non-partisan Congressional Research service.

Proven reserves are: “certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions.”

The key word there is “existing” conditions.

The U.S. has around 20 billion barrels in proven reserves, but the amount of undiscovered so called “technically recoverable” oil is over seven times that.

Those are the government’s own figures!

And we can get that oil using today’s technology. In fact, the U.S. has nearly 1.5 trillion barrels of oil.

That’s enough to fuel the present needs in the U.S. for around 250 years, according to the Institute for Energy Research.

Former President of Shell Oil on FBN earlier today on how we could easily get back to producing 10 million barrels a day:

“The best source for new oil is the world’s largest consumer economy: this country. We could go back to 10 million barrels if we had the permitting that would enable it to happen. We have the oil. There is more oil in this country that we’re not allowed to get at than oil we’re allowed to get at.”

But much of the oil is off limits thanks to the policies of this President:

-The outer Continental shelf.

-The Arctic National Wildlife Reserve in Anwar.

-And Shale Oil where the United States has the largest deposits in the world estimated by the government to be over 2 trillion barrels.

Even when the production is not in this country, the President will do anything he can to stop it, like blocking the Keystone pipeline.

Also, what the President is refusing to acknowledge is the United States is in the middle of an oil boom thanks to new technology like deep-water drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

So the President needs to stop with the 2% lie.

The solutions are right in front of us, but this administration flatly refuses to explore them.


 

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: LAS RAICES DEL RADICALISMO MARXISTA Y RACISTA DE OBAMA

[ Editado ]

OBAMA EMBRACED DERRICK BELL AND MALCOM X, NOT LUTHER KING.

How Derrick Bell Beat Martin Luther King Jr.

 

By Daniel Greenfield On March 12, 2012 In Daily Mailer,FrontPage

“History proves that the white man is a devil,” said Malcolm X. “Whites are liars,” said Jeremiah Wright. “I love to harass white folks,” said Derrick Bell.

“This is what you deserve. You get what you deserve, white boy,” a black teenager said to Allen Coon, a white student on the porch of his own home, as he set him on fire.

“Don’ tell me words don’t matter,” Obama once said. And he was right. Words do matter. The words of his mentors that have rooted hate so deep in the black community that it has become a cancer, a sore that bleeds violence, a stain on the soul.

While white racism continues to decline year by year, black racism has advanced to the White House and into the hearts and minds of millions. It leads to everything from discrimination to murder. It led to a thirteen-year-old boy screaming as fire ate at the flesh of his face, burning away the white skin that his attackers had been taught to hate so much.

“While city officials, state agencies, white liberals, and sober-minded Negroes stand idly by, a group of Negro dissenters is taking to street-corner step ladders, church pulpits, sports arenas, and ballroom platforms across the United States, to preach a gospel of hate that would set off a federal investigation if it were preached by Southern whites.”

The year was 1959 and the voice was that of Mike Wallace. Since then the “Gospel of Hate” has become mainstream in parts of the black community. Black leaders like Jeremiah Wright have discarded the Black Muslim origins of their hate, along with the tales of UFOs and Mohammed, but have retained its deep-seated venomous racism.

The Nation of Islam, the subject of Wallace’s documentary, has won. Its Million Man March was the largest organized show of political force by the black community in decades. Its breakaway activist, Malcolm X, has displaced Martin Luther King, as a political role model in the black community. Most of all its hate has become distilled into the rhetoric and beliefs of even non-Muslim clergy and scholars.

While we look at the hateful words of a Jeremiah Wright or a Derrick Bell who preach from the pulpit or propound from their ivory tower desks, we often ignore their impact on the ground floor of public life and what happens when their teachings trickle down to create an atmosphere of oppression and hate.

Allen Coon, a 13-year-old boy, was set on fire as a consequence of the mainstreaming of racism in the black community to the extent that hatred for white people became a regular feature of his classes at school.

 “You’ve got to be taught, to hate and fear,” Lieutenant Cable hummed in Rodger and Hammerstein’s South Pacific. “You’ve got to be taught, from year to year.”

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: LAS RAICES DEL RADICALISMO MARXISTA Y RACISTA DE OBAMA

PART 2

 

Allen Coon’s assailants, who followed him home from school, poured gasoline on him and flicked the lighter, had been carefully taught to hate by teachers in the Kansas City public school system. Those teachers had also been taught to hate from year to year. The burns on the face of a thirteen-year-old white boy did not emerge out of thin air. They are marks of the bigotry of men like Jeremiah Wright and Derrick Bell, of words that collect like rainwater in the gutter, seeping into the hearts and minds of those in the black community who consider those bigots leaders, until it overflows and torture, rape and murder follow.

The greatest testament to the triumph of black racism in the black community is in the number of racist figures surrounding Barack Obama.

If anyone imagined a black president in 1959, few would have imagined that his wife would pose in a photo together with the wife of the leader of a black hate group, that his mentor would screech “God da..mn America” from the pulpit or that his good friend would proudly proclaim, “I live to harass white folks.”

As parents and students from the same school that Allen Coon attended come forward to testify to the atmosphere of racism and racial intimidation, we can easily imagine the coverage that the story would receive if only the races were reversed. Cameras would fill every corner of East High School, assemblies would be called, tolerance programs would be implemented, and every media outlet would demand an orgy of soul-searching by white parents and students to understand their part in this atrocity.

Two years ago Newsweek ran a photo of a white baby asking the question, “Is your baby racist?” While the media will gleefully charge 6-month-old white babies with racism, accusing them of bigotry for staring longer at photos of other races; it will go on ignoring the Allen Coon case, as it has ignored any number of similar and worse cases. Obama graced Sandra Fluke with a sympathetic phone call over the devastating trauma of being called a slut. Having your face set on fire though doesn’t qualify for a two minute long distance call from the Oval Office.

The eager critiquers of white bigotry are unwilling to take a hard look at the unpleasant reality of black racism and their role in sanctifying and perpetuating it. They are unwilling to analyze language like, “You get what you deserve, white boy,” to find the legacy of hate embedded within from their own teachings, which say that victimization invites a violent response, that guilt is racial rather than individual and being told you are the victim exempts you from accountability for your own actions.

“I pale in hatred to the hatred of white people,” Farrakhan once said, justifying his black racism through the prop of white racism. That prop is still there, and its spectral image of a universal and pervasive white racism is taught in every school and used to justify every aspect of black racism, from discrimination at colleges to intimidation at polls, to setting a thirteen-year-old boy on fire.

The Allen Coon case is yet another reminder that an end to racism does not mean an end to white racism. It means an end to all racism. And that day will only come when black people are just as ashamed of Jeremiah Wright, affirmative action and schools like East High School where white students are harassed because of their race, as white people already are of separate lunch counters and drinking fountains.

“You get what you deserve, white boy,” isn’t just the credo of Coon’s attackers; it’s the credo of Al Sharpton, of Derrick Bell, of Jeremiah Wright and of a legion of black activists, academics and clergy. And until that credo is rooted out as completely as “segregation forever,” then America will remain a nation divided by race.

 

 

Zafiro
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,641
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: LAS RAICES DEL RADICALISMO MARXISTA Y RACISTA DE OBAMA

BPTerrorists

OBAMA'S BLACK PANTHERS THUGS THREATENING WHITE

VOTERS IN 2008 ELECTION

"We kill the women. We kill the children. We kill the babies. We kill the blind. We kill the crippled. We kill the crazies. We kill ‘em all. We kill the faggots. We kill the lesbians. We kill them all." Khalid Abdul Muhammad

National Chairman of the New Black Panther Party until his death.