¡Bienvenido a los Foros de Univision! Participa, intercambia mensajes privados, sube tus fotos y forma parte de nuestra Comunidad. | Ingresa | Regístrate Gratis
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009
0 Kudos

Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model

[ Editado ]

Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model

Posted By Frontpagemag.com On January 27, 2012  In Daily Mailer,FrontPage



Presidential candidate Newt Gingrich recently made news by referring to Barack Obama as a “Saul Alinsky radical” whose philosophy is destructive of traditional American values. Who was Saul Alinsky? What was his message? How has his radical vision, a key element of the 1960s leftist assault on America, influenced Obama?

You can find the answers by reading David Horowtiz’s Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model posted below. Since its publication in 2010, more than 2 million copies of this best selling pamphlet have been distributed. Horowitz shows the entire iceberg whose tip was revealed in Newt Gingrich’s comment.

FrontPage has been covering the connection between Obama and Alinsky and other 60s radicals since the election of 2008. This leftist network, which heavily influences the current White House, is dissected in detail in our encyclopedia of the Left, discoverthenetworks.org.

Please help the Freedom Center educate our citizens in this critical time about Obama’s efforts to radically transform America—his intellectual inheritance from Saul Alinsky. Please support the Freedom Center and help us immediately get another printing of Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model into circulation.


In a 2008 debate, Charlie Gibson asked Barack Obama about his support for raising capital gains taxes, given the historical record of government losing net revenue as a result. Obama persevered: "Well, Charlie, what I've said is that I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness."

A most revealing window into our president's political core: To impose a tax that actually impoverishes our communal bank account (the U.S. Treasury) is ridiculous. It is nothing but punitive. It benefits no one — not the rich, not the poor, not the government. For Obama, however, it brings fairness, which is priceless.


Communists map out Obama agenda Immediately following the November 2008 Obama's triumph, communist party leader, Sam West, affirmed that now they not only have a friend in the White House, but a president who will pursue the party’s agenda. WND reported the Communist Party USA mapped out policies crucial for Obama to push through in his first term, including a "single payer" socialist health-care system; laws to make joining a labor union easier; raising the minimum wage and increasing labor union support.    In May 2009, WND  reported the leader of the Communist Party USA declared that with Obama as president, health care and the economy can be "reformed," U.S. troops can be evacuated from the Middle East, a second stimulus bill can be passed, the criminal justice system can be overhauled and union rights can be expanded.  "All these – and many other things – are within our reach now!" exclaimed Webb in a New York banquet speech for the People's Weekly World, the official newspaper of the Communist Party USA.



CNN Turns Blind Eye To Obama-Alinsky Ties

IBD 01/26/2012

The Prediction Of Norman Mattoon Thomas

Is Coming True


Today, even the most socialist Dems will still deny that their policies and the

policies of Barack Obama are socialist.

Thomas was right.  We Americans will never “knowingly”

adopt socialism.

Are you ready to wake up yet?

Journalism: As the president launches his re-election bid by striking a more centrist tone, the partisan press is helping him whitewash his radical past. Teamwork or not, it’ll be hard to bleach.

Exhibit A is CNN’s Soledad O’Brien. Earlier this week, she hosted a segment that tried to de-link Obama from Chicago socialist Saul Alinsky. The late Alinsky is the father of community organizing and the author of the far-left bible “Rules for Radicals.”

O’Brien opened her piece by scolding GOP front-runner Newt Gingrich for warning Obama “will represent Saul Alinsky (and) European socialism” in a second term. “President Obama has never said that he was influenced by Alinsky,” O’Brien insisted.

Of course he hasn’t. He’s not stupid enough to publicly link himself to a socialist. But the record is clear that he was in fact influenced by Alinsky, if only CNN’s “journalists” would do their homework. Allow us to do it for them:

• Obama first learned Alinsky’s rules in the 1980s, when Alinskyite radicals with the Chicago-based Alinsky group Gamaliel Foundation recruited, hired, trained and paid him as a community organizer in South Side Chicago. (Gamaliel’s website expressly states it grew out of the Alinsky movement.)

• In 1988, Obama even wrote a chapter for the book “After Alinsky: Community Organizing in Illinois,” in which he lamented organizers’ “lack of power” in implementing change.

• Gamaliel board member John McKnight, a hard-core student of Alinsky, penned a letter for Obama to help him get into Harvard Law School.

• Obama took a break from his Harvard studies to travel to Los Angeles for eight days of intense training at Alinsky’s Industrial Areas Foundation, a station of the cross for acolytes.

• In turn, he trained other community organizers in Alinsky agitation tactics.

• Obama also taught Alinsky’s “Power Analysis” methods at the University of Chicago.

• During the presidential campaign, Obama hired one of his Gamaliel mentors, Mike Kruglik, to train young campaign workers in Alinsky tactics at “Camp Obama,” a school set up at Obama headquarters in Chicago. The tactics helped Obama capture the youth vote like no other president before him.

• Power would no longer be an issue, as Obama infiltrated the highest echelon of the political establishment — the White House — fulfilling Alinsky’s vision of a new “vanguard” of coat-and-tie radicals who “work inside the system” to change the system.


Saul Alinsky:
Lest we forget at least and over-the shoulder
acknowledegment to the very first radical: from all
our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to
know where mythology leaves off and history begins-
or which is which), the first radical knwon to man
who rebelled against the establishment and did it
so effectivelly that he at least won his own kingdom
Obama studied and has used the soul less tactics of Saul Alinsky to destroy political enemies. They are currently using the Alinsky tactic of ridicule to destroy Republican candidates as well as alienate and marginalize conservative black Americans.

• After the election, his other Gamaliel mentor, Jerry Kellman (who hired him and whose identity Obama disguised in his memoir), helped the Obama administration establish Organizing for America, which mobilizes young supporters to agitate for Obama’s legislative agenda using “Rules for Radicals.”

• Obama’s favorite rule is No. 13: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it.” You see that in his attacks on “fat cat bankers,” “greedy health insurers” and “millionaires and billionaires.” He also readily applies Alinsky’s fifth rule of “ridiculing” the opposition.

“Obama learned his lesson well,” said David Alinsky, son of the late socialist. “I am proud to see that my father’s model for organizing is being applied successfully beyond local community organizing.”

Bizarrely, O’Brien was more than willing to connect Alinsky with the Tea Party, without citing a shred of real evidence to back up the silly claim. The CNN anchor closed her segment by saying she would pin Gingrich down on his supposedly misleading claims. “We will be sure to ask the former speaker the next time we get a chance to talk to him about that,” she said.

Wouldn’t it make more sense to just ask Obama? You know, “Mr. President, have you ever read Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals’”? Or “Have your ever trained at organizations founded by Alinsky?”

Is she really this clueless? Or is she covering for Obama? Either way, it does not reflect well on a journalist of her stature and influence.

It’s plain CNN plans to gloss over the president’s radical past in this campaign, just like it did in 2008.

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model

The Osawatomie Coincidence

Submitted by Trevor on December 8, 2011

Why would Barack Obama choose to give a controversial speech attacking American capitalism in Osawatomie, Kansas? 

Hang on? Where have I heard that name before? Osawatomie? ….back in the ’70s? Weather Underground terrorists… Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.  Didn’t Obama used to hang out  with those guys?

I remember! Osawatomie was the publication of the Weather Underground!


No, surely its a coincidence….



Bill Ayers and his wife, Bernardine Dohrn, founders of the Weather Underground, a radical, murderous Marxist terrorist group of the Vietnam era. In the Ayer/Dorhn home Obama started his fundraising for state senator for Illinois, it was the beginning of a long and close relationship.

The Fresh Prince Of Bill Ayers BillLawrenceOnline.Com ^| 9-15-11

    A bizarre, Maoist attempt to squelch dissent by President Barack Obama has earned him the  sobriquet  The Fresh Prince of Bill Ayers which is being tweeted around the world.    Ayers is the bizarre, Maoist 1960s radical and wealthy Chicagoan who was instrumental in Obama's rise to power.    Ayers once said 25 million Americans would have to be eliminated in order to bring about his utopian dream. Ayers is married to Bernardine Dohrn who famously expressed  approval of murder of Sharon Tate and others by the Manson family.    Obama is asking that reports of any criticism of himself or his administration be reported through the website .... It's clearly an attempt to intimidate but it appears to have backfired as Obama's opponents on all parts of the political spectrum have been reporting themselves with scathing comments.   
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model

James Rosen’s Strange Exoneration of Saul Alinsky

By Mark Tapson On January 27, 2012 In Daily Mailer,FrontPage |

In a refreshing change of pace from Republican candidates taking potshots at each other on the campaign trail, Newt Gingrich put some perspective on the presidential race when he clarified the challenge for the eventual party nominee, and what is at stake. He told a large crowd in Coral Springs, Florida Wednesday that we need somebody who is a conservative and who can stand up to [President Obama] and debate and who can clearly draw the contrast between the Declaration of Independence and the writings of Saul Alinsky… The centerpiece of this campaign, I believe, is American exceptionalism versus the radicalism of Saul Alinsky.

Gingrich’s attempts to tie Alinsky, the Chicago community organizer and author of the revolutionary handbook Rules for Radicals, to the Chicago community organizer in the White House prompted James Rosen to question this unusual strategy for Fox News online:

Why does Gingrich think it effective messaging for him to conjure a man who’s been dead forty years, and whose name is recognized, in all probability, by one in every 100,000 registered voters?

Rosen’s piece “Gingrich attacks on Obama resurrect Saul Alinsky” suggests that Alinsky is nothing more than an obscure, forgotten civil rights leader whose model for organizing the “Have Nots” against the entrenched “Haves” aims to empower the powerless and mainstream the marginalized. Rosen notes that Alinsky helped tutor, among others, a young Cesar Chavez, who “became one of the most celebrated activists of the twentieth century,” and that Alinsky’s intent was to teach people how “to realize the democratic dream of equality, justice, peace.” The closest Rosen comes to painting a negative about Alinsky is by noting his “in-your-face” **noallow**. He even closes the article by claiming that “numerous Tea Party figures have expressed admiration for Rules for Radicals, as a primer on grassroots activism.”

It’s hard to imagine there could be a single Tea Partier who “admires” Alinsky and his strategy of deception to effect radical social transformation. It would be more accurate to say that anyone truly familiar with Alinsky’s methodology of infiltration mixed with confrontation simply acknowledges its impact on the left and its effectiveness in getting disciple Obama into the Presidency.

To get the complete picture of Saul Alinsky and his influence over protégés like Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, click here to download the Freedom Center’s essential, 50-page booklet from 2009, Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model, by David Horowitz. The most prominent apostate of the radical left, Horowitz understands them and exposes their cynical, power-grabbing strategies like no one else.
“Alinsky is the Sun-Tzu for today’s radicals,” he writes, “his book a manual for their political war.” Here Horowitz identifies Alinsky’s and the progressive left’s political nihilism:

An SDS [Students for a Democratic Society] radical once wrote, “The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution.” In other words the cause – whether inner-city blacks or women – is never the real cause, but only an occasion to advance the real cause which is the accumulation of power to make the revolution. That was the all-consuming focus of Alinsky and his radicals.

Hillary Rodham interviewed Alinsky himself for her college senior thesis, in which she compared him to Martin Luther King, Jr. After college she was offered a **noallow** in Alinsky’s new training institute in Chicago, but she went to Yale Law School instead and met future husband Bill – although she maintained her connections to and support of Alinsky’s army.

Young Barack Obama worked in Chicago for Alinsky-modeled organizations, was mentored by Alinskyites, and even taught workshops on the Alinsky method. Until he became a full-time legislator, Obama’s political activities were focused on the now infamously corrupt, radical activist ACORN organization, built on the Alinsky model.

Then he went on to run for President, of course; here Horowitz dissects a passage from Rules for Radicals and makes the direct connection to Obama’s successful campaign strategy:

“Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people.” In other words, it is first necessary to sell the people on change itself, the “audacity of hope,” and “yes we can.” You do this by proposing moderate changes which open the door to your radical agendas.

How has Obama responded to Gingrich raising the specter of Alinsky in this campaign? White House Press Secretary Jay Carney responded to a press conference question about it with a laughably oblique non-denial:

[t]he president’s background as a community organizer is well documented in the president’s own books, so his experience in that field obviously contributed to who he is today. But his experience is a broad-based one that includes a lot of other areas in his life.

“What radicals like Alinsky create is not salvation but chaos,” Horowitz writes in Barack Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model. “And presidential disciples of Alinsky? What will they create?” By insisting on invoking Saul Alinsky’s name in this campaign, Newt Gingrich is hoping to expose the radical roots of Obama’s political nihilism.


Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model

[ Editado ]

Alinsky-Obama : Reglas para radicales

Por Alberto Acereda

Tras Obama está la herencia de radicales como Alinsky y el grueso de quienes quieren acabar con la libertad y el sistema norteamericano, gentes que saben muy bien lo que están haciendo.

Saúl Alinsky (1909-1972), el radical neo-marxista norteamericano inspiró a varios de los más importantes políticos actuales del Partido Demócrata, particularmente a los dos últimos candidatos a la presidencia en aquel partido: Hillary Clinton y al actual presidente Barack Obama.

Aunque fue un hecho silenciado durante los años de Bill Clinton, es ya público que Hillary Clinton escribió su tesis universitaria en Wellesley College sobre Alinsky y expresó en varias ocasiones su admiración por sus ideas y la influencia de éste en su labor política. Obama también siguió abiertamente los pasos de Alinsky y fue “organizador de comunidades” en el sur de Chicago siguiendo y enseñando el método Alinsky en compañía de radicales racistas como Jeremiah Wright, terroristas como Bill Ayers o hampones como Tony Rezko.

Alinsky era un activista social que dedicó textualmente uno de sus libros al que él juzgó como primer radical de la historia: “Lucifer”. Su método consistía en juntar a ciudadanos de un vecindario o comunidad en torno a reclamaciones y quejas, animándolos y dirigiéndolos a rebelarse y a protestar ininterrumpidamente.

Alinsky entendió y puso en práctica la idea de que los residentes de una comunidad podían ser hábilmente organizados como agitadores a fin de alcanzar cualquier tipo de reforma por descabellada que fuera. Su principal libro –Rules for Radicals (1971)– expone sus ideas a modo de compendio de reglas tácticas para alcanzar el poder y constituye uno de los textos de cabecera de la izquierda norteamericana y también del actual presidente Obama.

Basta leer Rules for Radicals para darse cuenta de que mucho de lo que Obama ha venido haciendo en su carrera política tiene su origen en ese libro. Tanto es así que al portavoz de la Casa Blanca –Robert Gibbs– le han preguntado varias veces al respecto. Pese a la negación y el disimulo del portavoz, Obama sigue a Alinsky en varios aspectos, sobre todo en la importancia que aquel neo-marxista otorgaba a trabajar y ejercer el cambio desde dentro del sistema. O cuando Alinsky señalaba que cualquier cambio revolucionario debía ser presentado antes como un cambio afirmativo, de actitud pasiva y no amenazante.

Con ese mismo disimulo actuó Obama en toda su campaña electoral, campaña que, no nos engañemos, sigue realizando también desde la misma presidencia y ya dentro del sistema pensando en 2012... Y quién sabe si también en 2016... Porque puestos al cambio, todo puede llegar y más si algún congresista de su partido empuja para cambiar la vigésimo segunda enmienda constitucional.

Mas volviendo a Alinsky, éste también proponía lo que Obama luego alcanzó también en su campaña: que los norteamericanos se sintieran tan frustrados, tan vencidos, tan sin futuro y esperanza en el sistema en el que vivían que se convenciera a la mayoría para dejar atrás el pasado (la tradición norteamericana del individualismo y la responsabilidad) y para apostar por cambiar el futuro.



Los años Bush fueron los demonizados por Obama y, por defecto, su promesa como candidato era el hipotético cambio en el que todos debíamos creer.

Hoy Obama y los líderes del Partido Demócrata parecen seguir al dedillo las trece reglas para radicales presentadas por Alinsky en su libro. La tercera regla, por ejemplo, recomienda: “Siempre que sea posible, sal fuera de las experiencias del enemigo. Busca formas de aumentar la inseguridad, la ansiedad y la incertidumbre”. Si el enemigo es el sistema capitalista y el liberalismo económico, vemos cómo Obama ha logrado aumentar la incertidumbre sobre lo positivo del capitalismo y lo está sustituyendo paulatinamente por el gigantesco intervencionismo del Gran Gobierno.

La cuarta regla de Alinsky recomienda: “Haz que el enemigo esté a la altura de su propio libro de reglas”. Así, mientras los escándalos del Partido Demócrata son silenciados o disimulados, cualquier error del Partido Republicano se eleva a la enésima potencia. Basta mirar la lista de políticos con casos de corrupción que siguen hoy poblando el Partido Demócrata frente al inmediato cese que se produce de políticos errados en el lado republicano.

La decimotercera regla de Alinsky es quizá la más importante: “Elegid el objetivo, fijadlo, asociadlo a una persona, y llevadlo al extremo”. Los valores conservadores y su encarnación en figuras políticas como Sarah Palin, por dar un ejemplo, confirman la puntual aplicación de esa regla por parte del Partido Demócrata en términos de destrucción personal y política. Lo mismo ocurre con el ataque despiadado a medios y comentaristas políticos conservadores a quienes –como quería Alinsky– se intenta aislar y congelar como objetivo y se despedazan públicamente.

En este año del centenario de Alinsky no cabe mejor homenaje a la figura de tan peligroso figurón que el que Obama está dando a su mentor y al libro que –cual cartilla escolar– sigue el presidente sin pestañear. Porque tras Obama está la herencia de radicales como Alinsky y el grueso de quienes quieren acabar con la libertad y el sistema norteamericano, gentes que saben muy bien lo que están haciendo.

Para que el “cambio” de Obama sea real y tenga resultados hace falta el caos social, la confusión, el desconsuelo del ciudadano y su convencimiento de que el futuro depende del supuesto bienestar que proporciona el Gran Gobierno.

Afortunadamente, los garrafales resultados de la gestión Obama para la sociedad norteamericana ya se van viendo cada vez más claros. Aunque producen el caos que Obama necesita, hay ya afortunadamente un importante sector de ciudadanos que han abierto los ojos a la realidad. Es por ello que la popularidad de Obama y, sobre todo de sus nefastas políticas, están ya en el punto más bajo en toda su presidencia. Pero importa resaltar que ese caos y confusión, el aumento del desempleo y la visión apocalíptica del futuro de Estados Unidos es precisamente lo que a corto plazo más ayuda a Obama y a cuantos, entre cortinas, le apoyan.

Contra lo que se piensa, el derrumbe del sistema financiero y la perpetuación de la actual crisis económica permiten a Obama seguir llevando a cabo –al menos hasta 2010 y de la mano de las mayorías del Partido Demócrata– la mayor ampliación del Gobierno en la historia de Estados Unidos y la radical transformación del sistema social y político norteamericano, tal y como quería Alinsky y sus cómplices. Ahí es donde entra la expansión gubernamental en todos los ámbitos, incluido el tema de la salud y el nuevo paquete de “estímulo” que Obama está ya cociendo con los suyos como fórmula para seguir engordando al Gobierno.

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model


Saul Alinsky and the Left’s Mentor - Lucifer - The Master Politician




Does the title to this post seem over the top and radically charged to you? Well my friend, it isn't. As a matter of fact, it is right on in light of the current agenda at present by President Obama and his secular administration. President Obama and many on the Left have made no small qualms about being a disciple of Saul Alinsky and applying his tactics in their ever growing quest for power and control .

A great many Leftist in America today follow the radical teachings of their mentor Saul Alinsky - including Obama . Little do they know that they are following in the very footprints of his (Alinsky's) mentor and master, i.e., Lucifer (John 8:44).


Rules for Radicals is a book by Saul Alinsky which is dedicated to the original radical, Lucifer, who is also known as Satan, the Devil, The Old Serpent, and The Dragon (Rev.12:2,20:2). All other dinky despots have their roots in this arch-villain. In this book is found the following:
“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

The Master Politician

Today, Lucifer (i.e.,Satan) and his Satanic "Spin Machine" are well oiled and more powerful then ever. The Media outlets at his disposal greatly abound. From the Internet to TV and Radio Networks, from Hollywood to the Music Industry, from College Campuses to the Federal Courthouses to the Supreme Courts, and from Cultural Ideologies to the Fashion World.



With this powerful arsenal at his disposal he has the might and authority to sway public opinion and multitudes "24/7" and at a moments notice. Never in the history of mankind has this Fallen Cherub been so powerful.



Lucifer has the power and authority to erode moral and traditional values, to influence and affect elections, to cause politicians to rise and fall, to change the social climate, and to push global causes and crises. For the Bible states: For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places (Ephesians 6:12). In a vain and never-ending quest for power and worship, his sole desire and passionate goal is for the total eradication of Almighty God from Time and Eternity (ref. Isaiah 14:12-17 and Ezekiel 28:12-19).



In the last 100 years just look at how Godless and decadent our culture and society has become with the rise and exaltation of these media outlets. Generations have been brainwashed and have drunk the Satanic "Kool-Aid", i.e., that we do not need Almighty God or His Absolutes in our culture and society. As the former "One Nation Under God," sadly we have reaped the Godless consequences.


The Bible states: In whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them (2 Corinthians 4:4).



The name Satan or the Devil was given to Lucifer, Son of the Morning by Almighty God (ref. Job chapter 1). These respective names mean Accuser and Slanderer. He was so named because of his attitude and actions. Lucifer (Satan) is not the fictional "boogy-man" or Frankenstein's monster, as some have believed.



Satan is The Puppet Master, The Master Politician and The Prince of the Power of the Air. His Masterful tactics of deceit, cunning craftiness, calculation, manipulation, politics, flattery, pawn-playing and prideful ways are truly unrivaled in light of all God's created beings. He uses his God-given brilliance for one purpose and one alone: a mad attempt to discredit his Creator and exalt himself above Him.
Lucifer's (Satan's) Minions abound everywhere today in the American Mainstream Media. They unknowingly do his will. He knows how to maneuver and appeal to our carnal (fleshly) fallen nature which is governed by the five physical senses (sight, smell, taste, touch and hearing). The secular liberal mindset is the most open to Satan's suggestions for a Godless trend-setting agenda. They do his will quite readily because they are the most susceptible to it.


Jesus stated to the scoffers in his day: Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it (John 8:44-45).


The Bible also states: Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience (Ephesians 2:2).


Conservative sources try to counteract the Godless liberal secular "spin," but they have not been able to stop the flood of their secular agenda. Whether Conservative, Moderate or Liberal, the vast majority in the political spectrum are unbelievers of the Authority and Sovereignty of Almighty God and His Word. They posses an unregenerate heart and mind which is blind to the reality of the truth of the True Gospel message (ref. 2 Corinthians 4:4). You can almost hear the subtle hiss of the Serpent today as these secularist unbelievers seek to destroy our historic Judean/Christian values and push for a secular, Godless state and world.
"You can almost hear the subtle hiss of the Serpent today as these secularist unbelievers seek to destroy our historic Judean/Christian values and push for a secular, Godless state and world"

The Mainstream media and Washington D.C. are dominated today by this Leftist, Secular and Godless mindset. That isn't any secret. Not even the unregenerate (unbelievers) will disagree with that. As Satan controls more and more of the Media today - with these Godless surrogates and talking heads - his agenda is moving along quite rapidly and increasing exponentially.
"Never in the history of this nation has the Main Stream liberal Media pushed and supported a President’s leftist agenda as this one we have today"

Today Lucifer is ram-rodding, bulldozing, redefining and tilling the worldly ground for the future Grand Reception of his Ultimate Agenda presided over by his Ultimate Minion, the Anti-Christ, who will head a Godless and Secular World Government in the near future. At that time he will totally posses All the World Media and will vigorously push his Godless Agenda to all the world's doom.


Shama! Listen to what God's word states about this time:

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness (2 Thessalonians 2:3-12).


The Bible states further: And they worshipped the dragon ( Lucifer) which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped the beast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him? And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months. And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against God, to blaspheme his name, and his tabernacle, and them that dwell in heaven. And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and power was given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell upon the earth shall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world (Revelation 13:4-8).


In these Last Days as we see Lucifer's (Satan's) grip squeezing tighter and tighter, and his agenda solidifying and being established right before our very eyes, there is still great hope as we place our trust in Almighty God and His never changing Word! God's Christ and His Kingdom are coming as the Holy Scripture states (Luke 11:2, 2 Thes. 2:8, Daniel 7:13,14, Rev. 19:11-16).


Do you know the Lord Jesus Christ as your Savior? If not, Trust in Him today!


This statement is written in God's Word to those who know Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.


Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he (The Lord Jesus Christ) that is in you, than he (Lucifer) that is in the world. (1 John 4:4)









Obama, Lucifer, Saul Alinsky, Community Organizer, God Da...mn America, Wright, Farrakhan, Obama no Christian, Heads up from Rush Limbaugh
Posted on September 12, 2008 |
“Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer

Saul Alinsky dedicates his book, “Rules for Radicals” to Lucifer.

“Thirteen years after Alinsky died, some of his former students hired Barack Obama to a $13,000 a year job as a community organizer in South Chicago. In a few years he became very proficient in the Alinsky Method of community organizing and became an instructor and teacher of the Alinsky Method to other community organizers.”

“Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so futureless in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future.”

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model

[ Editado ]

Michelle Obama Used Lines From Saul Alinsky’s Book, ‘Rules for Radicals’ In Speech

August 26, 2008

Last night Michelle Obama used lines from Rules for Radicals, a radical Far Left book by Saul Alinsky (”father of community organizing” and a notorious far-left radical) in her DNC Convention speech.

Gateway Pundit nailed her:

What to make of Michelle Obama’s use the terms, “The world as it is” and “The world as it should be?” From whence do they originate? Try Chapter 2 of Saul Alinsky’s book, Rules for Radicals.
“Barack stood up that day,” talking about a visit to Chicago neighborhoods, “and spoke words that have stayed with me ever since. He talked about “The world as it is” and “The world as it should be...”

And, “All of us driven by a simple belief that the world as it is just won’t do - that we have an obligation to fight for the world as it should be.”


America is a Nation of Broken Souls" Michelle Obama

 Enough said about Michelle Obama's verified racist paranoia, anti-white hostility and anti-American beliefs. In another reality, she might make an acceptable First Lady,but NOT in America and NOT in the White House.
"America is a Nation of Broken Souls" Michelle Obama

Here’s an excerpt from Chapter 2 of Saul Alinsky’s book, Rules for Radicals:

“The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political **noallow**. In fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves...The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means... The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be.”

Dan Reihl writes that although Gateway Pundit points out that Michelle Obama quoted concepts from Rules for Radicals in her speech last night and suggests she heard it in church, more likely, it was Barack Obama that came up with it due to the individual who started him off in his activist pursuits - Jerry Kellman, an organizer working on Chicago’s far South Side.

Kellman was an Alinsky protege.

After college Obama moved to Chicago to be part of the Jerry Kellman organization as a community organizer. [Kellman was a Saul Alinsky protege.]

Among the primary goals of Alinsky was radical socialism and redistribution of wealth. Alinsky taught his proteges to “HIDE” their true goals by any means necessary. Lying was fine. The objective of Alinsky and Kellman was to turn people against the white establishment.
Do the Obamas really think that all America is as blind as the Obamanauts and starry-eyed Democrats at the convention so as to not see through the Obama’s ‘touchy-feely, God and country’ charade - aware of their Marxist agenda and what they are really saying?

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: Obama’s Rules for Revolution: The Alinsky Model

The Dohrn   Connection



Bernardine Dohrn has a  history  with the Justice Department. More specifically, in the early  1970s, she was one  of the FBI’s most wanted fugitives because of her  actions with the Weather  Underground, a violent radical  organization.

Times have changed. In 2010 and 2011, the Justice   Department saw fit to give $400,000 in grants to  an  organization that lists Dohrn as a member of its board of directors: a  $150,000  grant in September of 2010 and a $250,000 grant a year later.

The organization that received the grants is the  W.  Haywood Burns Institute, and the project that brought in the money is  the  Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative. JDAI aims to keep juvenile  criminals  out of ssecure confinement” and to reduce racial disparities in  the  juvenile justice system.

As a prominent figure in the Weather Underground — which  was initially known as simply “Weatherman” — Dohrn helped lead the “Days of  Rage” Chicago riot, and during her tenure the group was  responsible for numerous  bombings of government buildings. Although Dohrn  has never renounced her past,  her various legal troubles are behind her:  She served some probation, several  charges were dismissed, and she spent  some time in jail for refusing to  cooperate with an investigation. She’s  now a law professor at Northwestern  University, and her husband, fellow  Weather Underground co-founder William  Ayers, is a retired education  professor at the University of Illinois at  Chicago.

The Burns Institute’s name comes from a man who  himself  exemplified the blend of civil-rights activism, academic prestige,  and radical  politics that defines the group today. W. Haywood Burns worked  with Martin  Luther King Jr. during the civil-rights movement and  eventually became the dean  of the law school at Queens College. He  also was married to Bernardine  Dohrn’s sister, Jennifer, and he “represented the black radical  Angela Davis against charges of  kidnapping and murder, and coordinated the  defense for inmates indicted in  the Attica prison riot,” as the New York  Times noted in his 1996   obituary.

The Institute’s biography of Burns  refers  to the 1971 Attica rioters as “people struggling for  self-determination.” The  rioters protested poor conditions by taking their  guards hostage until police  launched a full assault on the prison. One of  the group’s leaders was Sam  Melville, who had bombed numerous government  and business buildings shortly  before the Weather Underground began doing  the same thing. After the horribly  managed police assault left 39 dead — in addition to an officer who was killed  by the rioters at the outset of  the incident, as well as several inmates who  were killed by other  prisoners during the chaos — the Weather Underground bombed  a New York  Department of Corrections facility in retaliation. Virtually everyone   involved in the Attica riots and their aftermath acted poorly, and yet, as   Patrick Brennan has noted on NRO before,  a  certain group of aging radicals seems to see the incident as some kind  of  triumph.

Meanwhile, JDAI, the project that earned the Burns   Institute its Justice grants, is spearheaded by the Annie E. Casey  Foundation.  In 2010 the federal government agreed to help the Casey  Foundation fund training  and other consulting services while it expands  the program to new sites, and it  was through this agreement that the Burns  Institute secured its grants. During  the grant-application process, the  Justice Department does not typically require  groups to provide lists of  their directors.

The Burns Institute’s primary goal is to reduce  racial  disparities in juvenile justice, a problem it attributes primarily  to  discrimination rather than disproportionate   misbehavior. The Institute aims to get the U.N.  to  take a role in American juvenile justice, and it also works with  local  governments (for a fee) to address the issue. The organization’s  process  involves bringing together various stakeholders — police, parents,  prosecutors,  etc. — to discuss policy changes. The group says that this helps   decrease juvenile confinement without sacrificing public   safety.

If that’s true, it’s good. But there are plenty of   charities that do good work without including Weather Underground   co-founders on their boards of directors and openly praising prison rioters  on  their websites. Presidential administrations have  considerable  discretion when it comes to federal grants. But it is not too  much to ask that  the Justice Department avoid giving money to groups with  ties to violent  radicals.

The Burns Institute did not provide a comment in  time  for publication, Dohrn did not reply to several attempts to contact  her, and the  Office of Justice Programs declined to provide a quote  for  attribution.

— Robert VerBruggen is a   deputy managing editor of National  Review.