Thanks to your generous support and efforts, we raised over $1,114,000 for our women’s health rapid response fund and we're only 18,000 signatures away from 500,000 supporters strong on our petition against Republicans’ disgraceful assault on women’s rights. But, the fight goes on.
Today -- the very day we kick off Women’s History Month -- Republicans held a vote on giving corporations the power to deny women access to basic health care.
Meanwhile, vicious and inappropriate attacks are being leveled at Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown law student that Republicans refused to let testify at an all-male panel on birth control coverage.
Join our call to Republican leaders in the House to condemn these vicious attacks on women.
Add your name: 500,000 Strong Against the Republican War on Women >>
We couldn’t be more grateful for all that you do to help us in our fight. Your actions today make sure that our voices will never be silenced.
Join the fight and sign our petition today: http://dccc.org/End-the-War-on-Women
Thank you for standing with us.
Publicado: 03-01-2012 03:57 PM
WebToday | 3-1-12 | Jerry McGlothlin
Live streaming is currently underway of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's news conference that has concluded that Barack Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate was a fraud! Sheriff Arpaio's cold posse investigators presented a visual side by side comparison of Obama's purported Long Form Birth Certificate with the investigators own recreation of an Optical Character Recognition (OCR) enhancement to see if there were any possibility of the birth certificate being legitimate. However it become clear that the long form birth certificate was a fraud.
The register stamp and date stamp were a safety feature to verify the authenticity of the document. But the fact that those stamps were imported from an outside source shows with certainty that it was fraudulent since those 'safety verification stamps were completely moveable to any point of the document. No original birth certificate circa the date of Obama's birth could possibly have had such movable computerized elements.
After concluding conclusively that that Obama's birth certificate was a fraud, then the investigators moved on to the issue of Obama's place of birth, investigating allegations that Obama was born abroad. They said that when they went through the airline travel documents for the time of his birth had a strategic missing number of documents during the time of Obama's alleged birth, indicative of someone removing records to impede an investigation.
The investigators then showed Obama's purported Selective Service card was fraudulent in that there was a collage of pica date stamps and the investigators were able to recreate the counterfeiting process that was identical to the counterfeited Selective Service card. The lead investigator concluded, "The document is fake. The representations of the document are fake," adding that a person of interest is being investigated who may have administrated this colossal fraud.
Then Dr. Jerome Corsi was introduced and is in the process of making his presentation at the time of this WebToday.tv upload.
Publicado: 03-01-2012 04:50 PM
Dear Mr. Feliu,
Thank you for contacting me about the DREAM Act and reforming our nation's immigration system. I appreciate your comments and am grateful that you took the time to contact me.
If the American dream is about one thing, it is the idea that if you play by the rules, work hard, and dream big, you can accomplish anything. But children of illegal immigrants face a far different reality because of our broken immigration system. That's why I was proud to cosponsor and help pass the DREAM Act last Congress, a common-sense solution that will provide a legal path to citizenship for law-abiding, successful young people who were brought to the United States as children by undocumented parents.
The DREAM Act would permit certain individuals who have grown up in the U.S. to apply for conditional non-immigrant status and to eventually obtain permanent status and become eligible for U.S. citizenship if they go to college or serve in the U.S. military. DREAM Act candidates must be 29 years of age or younger, have lived in the U.S. for 5 years or more before the date of enactment, have been brought to the U.S. before age 16, and complete two years of college or military service.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, 700,000 of our nation's best and brightest undocumented students will qualify for the DREAM Act. This legislation will also reduce the deficit by more than $2.2 billion over the next 10 years and increase revenues by $1.7 billion.
The DREAM Act has been reintroduced in the current Congress and I am hopeful that we will succeed in passing this important immigration legislation. While it isn't the comprehensive immigration reform we need, it's a huge step in the right direction.
Member of Congress
Publicado: 03-02-2012 01:46 PM
What the president might consider explaining is that the latest market surge (and its rise over recent months) are unsurprising to anyone familiar with America’s financial history. The rule that stretches back over the past century is clear: Stocks rise under Democrats and decline under Republicans. And that simple statistic is matched by a broad set of economic data that follow the same partisan vector. Republicans have often succeeded in persuading voters that their party is “good for the economy” – a persistent myth that the president ought to debunk.
That bastion of socialism, the Bloomberg News organization, made the basic point with a convenient chart and accompanying article on February 22, showing that the pattern holds all the way back to the Kennedy administration. Examining S&P 500 data over the past 50 years, reporter Bob Drummond found that an investor who put $1,000 in a market-tracking fund would have earned $10,920 by late February 2012 under the Democratic presidencies, but only $2,087 under the Republican presidencies. The contrast in the red-and-blue, seen here, is equally stark.
While Drummond's article might have startled anyone persuaded by the GOP's traditional economic myth-making, it is not a new story. While writing Big Lies, a book published several years ago, I found plenty of credible research on this topic, all of it pointing in the same direction. A study by Northwestern Mutual, the insurance and financial services giant --which looked at the performance of the S&P 500 from 1929 to 1979 -- demonstrated that even after removing two of the worst Republican periods under Herbert Hoover and Richard Nixon, the outcome still favored Democrats by 16/9 to 14.2 percent. The largest gains occurred under Franklin Delano Roosevelt (that supposed enemy of free markets), Harry Truman, Lyndon Johnson, and Bill Clinton. A 2000 study by the editors of the Stock Trader's Almanac, one of the most authoritative sources of Wall Street statistics, drew the same conclusions from examining the rise and fall of the Dow Jones, except that their conclusions were even more favorable to Democrats, who posted gains of 13.4 percent against 8.1 percent for Republicans. Editor Jeffrey Hirsch told Slate that the correlation between presidential party and stock appreciation was among the most significant statistical relationships he had ever seen.
"I don't know why people are convinced Republicans are good for the stock market," said Hirsch.
Stock indexes don't necessarily provide the most salient measure of economic progress, especially from a Democratic perspective. But by every economic yardstick -- whether it is gross domestic product, job creation, overall employment, disposable income, deficit reduction, spending restraint, or inflation -- the record of the Democratic presidencies is superior. This isn't propaganda, it's statistics. Someday, a politician who is not afraid of being called partisan will unveil that historical record to the public -- and urge them to let it guide their voting decisions.
Publicado: 03-02-2012 02:04 PM
HERODES OBAMA LEGADO, OBAMACARE: ABORTO, INFANTICIDIO Y EUTANASIA
Note by dqban22: On 28 October 1933 Bishop von Galen was consecrated Archbishop of Cologne; Bishop von Galen was the first diocesan Bishop to be consecrated under Hitler’s regime. As his motto, he chose the formula of the rite of episcopal consecration: “Nec laudibus, nec timore” (Neither praise nor threats will distance me from God).
Throughout the 20 years that Bishop von Galen was curate and parish priest in Berlin, he wrote on various political and social issues; in a pastoral letter dated 26 March 1934, he wrote very clearly and critically on the “neopaganism of the national socialist ideology”.
On 14 March 1937 the Encyclical “Mit brennender Sorge” (To the Bishops of Germany: The place of the Catholic Church in the German Reich) was published. It was widely circulated by Bishop von Galen, notwithstanding Nazi opposition. “Lion of Munster’
In the summer of 1941, in answer to unwarranted attacks by the National Socialists, Bishop von Galen delivered three admonitory sermons between July and August. He spoke in his old parish Church of St Lambert and in Liebfrauen-Ueberlassen Church, since the diocesan cathedral had been bombed.
In his famous speeches, Bishop von Galen spoke out against the State euthanasia program carried out by the regime against the handicap and the mentally retarded.
Are the American Bishops going to be less courageous confronting Obama than the German Bishops were in defending the attacks against the main tenets of the Catholic faith by Adolph Hitler?
NI LOS NIETOS DE OBAMA SE SALVAN DE LA PICOTA!!!
OBAMACARE, ABORTO DE BEBES
Y EUTANASIA DE LOS ANCIANOS
Or, at least, that's the assertion cartoonist Glenn McCoy seems to be making with his new cartoon in which an evil-looking Obama is seen turning over a pregnant white lady to a Mengele-esque abortionist.
who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis"
Publicado: 03-02-2012 06:49 PM
LO QUE TIENEN QUE HACER LOS SENORES SACERDOTES ES CONTROLAR LA EPIDEMIA DE PEDOFILOS CAUSANTES DE TANTO SUFRIMIENTO Y ABUSOS SEXUALES.
NO DEJO DE RECONOCER QUE HAY ALGUNOS SACERDOTES, USUALMENTE DISCRIMINADOS POR EL PROPIO VATICANO Y LA JERARQUIA DE LA IGLESIA QUE HAN LUCHADO POR LAS CLASES SOCIALES DESFAVORECIDAS, PERO SIN EXEPCION SIEMPRE HAN SIDO ACUSADOS DE COMUNISTAS, CLARO SIN TENER EN CUENTA QUE CRISTO MURIO POR ESOS MISMOS DESFAVORECIDOS QUE ELLOS DESPRECIAN.
LA RELIGION CATOLICA TIENE LAS MANOS TAN MANCHADAS DE SANGRE A TRAVES DE LA HISTORIA QUE DIFICILMENTE INSPIRE A NADIE QUE NO SEA UN IGNORANTE DE LA HISTORIA, HAN APOYADO TANTO A LAS CLASES DOMINANTES QUE NO TIENEN MORAL PARA SER EJEMPLO DE NADIE
Publicado: 03-03-2012 10:57 AM
Newt Gingrich DEMOLISHES Barack Obama in debate.
march 2, 20112
"As an American I am not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize without any accomplishments to his name, America gave him the White House based on the same credentials." Newt Gingrich (7/16/2008)
Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them. This quote came from a friend in the Czech Republic . We have a lot of work to do. "The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America .
Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama,who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."
Please open and enjoy:
Publicado: 03-03-2012 01:17 PM