¡Bienvenido a los Foros de Univision! Participa, intercambia mensajes privados, sube tus fotos y forma parte de nuestra Comunidad. | Ingresa | Regístrate Gratis
Mensajes: 2,776
Temas: 502
Kudos: 16
Publicaciones de blog: 0
Registrado: ‎07-18-2008

Re: ¿Cómo calificarías la gestión de Barack Obama en el últi

The GOP and their ardent supports like to throw out words like "socialism" as the great peril facing our country. That's just absurd. Our economic life has had elements of socialism for most of the past century, unless it now has a special meaning that doesn't include social security and medicare. The new paranoia on the right is the most serious threat we face in America. Fortunately most Americans appear to recognize the danger. That's the main reason congress has the lowest stature in over a century. WE MUST get rid of tea party lunatics from government and return to a saner time.


Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: ¿Cómo calificarías la gestión de Barack Obama en el últi

Rasmussen: Romney Leads Obama 48% to 43%, and Santorum Beats Obama 46% to 45%


Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

March 10, 2012

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows that 25% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Forty-four percent (44%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -19 (see trends).

Looking at Tuesday's upcoming primaries, the GOP race in Alabama is essentially a three-way tie, while Mitt Romney leads by eight in Mississippi. Nationally, Romney now leads Rick Santorum by 12 points. Regardless of who they want to win, 80% of Republican Primary Voters nationwide believe Romney will be the party's nominee.

With the perception growing that he will be the GOP nominee, Romney leads President Obama by five points in a hypothetical 2012 matchup. Today's numbers show Romney at 48%, Obama at 43%. That’s Romney’s largest lead since December. Matchup results are updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update).

If Santorum is the Republican nominee, he is up by one point over the president, 46% to 45%. This is the second time since polling began in 2011 that Santorum has had a slight lead over Obama. Romney is the only other candidate to lead the president more than one time in the polls.

Mensajes: 2,776
Temas: 502
Kudos: 16
Publicaciones de blog: 0
Registrado: ‎07-18-2008

Re: ¿Cómo calificarías la gestión de Barack Obama en el últi

Right now, the Republican presidential race is an embarrassing sideshow, but make no mistake: the GOP will rally around its eventual nominee and spend millions trying to tear down President Obama.

We've already seen how low they will go to smear President Obama and mislead voters—whether it's misrepresenting commonsense policies that protect women's access to contraception or rooting for the American economy to fail.

A reporter from Fox News even asked President Obama this week if he wanted gas prices to go up for middle-class families, echoing the latest popular conspiracy theory from right-wing talk radio.

Attacks like these are outrageous, but people will believe them unless we fight back now. Join the D...

We've counted on you before; we know we can count on you again. Thank you for your support of Democratic governors who are working with President Obama to move our country forward.

Más en Univision.com: http://foro.univision.com/t5/Noticias-y-Pol%C3%ADtica-en-Estados-Unidos/Why-do-they-call-it-quot-Sup...

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: ¿Cómo calificarías la gestión de Barack Obama en el últi

Revaluating Barack Obama’s IQ

Monday, October 5, 2009
Even amongst the HBD community, it was widely accepted that Barack Obama had a much higher than average IQ. HalfSigma estimated Obama’s IQ to be around 150. Such a score would put him comfortably amongst the foremost cognitive elite.

Yet with Obama’s early floundering as President and some leftist pundits openly questioning his knowledge of the issues, I think it’s suitable to reconsider just how smart Obama actually is.

We have several pieces of evidence to consider in making this assessment.

1) Attended both Occidental College and Columbia for undergraduate

We know absolutely nothing of his grades, transcripts, published writing, or testing scores from this era of Obama’s life. We know he was accepted to Columbia, but under the suspicion of affirmative action and given the range of scores at even elite colleges, this basically means nothing.

2) Attended Harvard Law school: Law Review Editor and graduated Magna ******* Laude

Again, this means nothing under the suspicion of affirmative action. Obama refuses to release his test scores, so I give his acceptance essentially no weight in supporting high intelligence. His pposition as Law Review Editor was probably garnered due to high status on campus and being a congenial fellow amongst his classmates. And surely, his white liberal and black classmates couldn’t contain themselves in electing Mr. Post-Racial as Editor.

Yet, Obama is the only editor in the history of the Harvard Law Review to not publish an article. He did graduate Magna ******* Laude, but given this writing sample, I find even that accomplishment suspicious. His writing sample is actually written quite well and I’m somewhat impressed by his word choice and sentence structure (surely better than his wife’s). However, his argument lacks any original thought and he commits the exact kind of errors a high-scoring LSAT student would have mastered. Here he uses personal anecdote as a counterargument (a type of error tested for on every LSAT):

I respect Mr. Chen’s personal concern over the possible stigmatizing effects of affirmative action...however, I have not personally felt stigmatized
He continues, outright admitting he’s an affirmative action admit:

I must say, however, that as someone who has undoubtedly benefited from affirmative action programs during my academic career, and as someone who may have benefited from the Law Review’s affirmative action policy when I was selected to join the Review last year
3) Wrote Dreams of My Father

I had considered this as sufficient evidence for asserting Obama had an extremely high intelligence. The author of Dreams is a masterful writer with a solid grasp of metaphor and prose. The inner ruminations of the Dreams Obama implies an intellectually gifted individual eager to understand his own psyche and how it relates to the larger world. Yet, given Jack Cashill’s investigations on the matter, I highly doubt Obama penned the more impressive parts of this book. Thus, I discount this as concrete evidence for Obama’s purported brilliance.

4) Law School Professor at University of Chicago for ten years

Another empty suit. Never published an article in ten years as a professor.

5) Great speaker (with teleprompter)

This video says it all (@ 0:13). The great orator is merely parroting a scrolling script:

In my estimation, taking into account his rather expansive vocabulary, penchant for stringing together good sentences, and being at the very top end of blacks, Obama’s likely around 125. He would excel at a large state school, but not at an elite one. Where would you put him on the Bell Curve?

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: ¿Cómo calificarías la gestión de Barack Obama en el últi

Pravda asks: What happened to American media?

Accuses U.S. press of ‘deliberately hiding evidence’ of Obama’s ‘fraud’
by Chelsea Schilling
 Schilling joined the Army at age 17, receiving the rare designation of expert marksman three times. In addition to WND, Schilling has worked as a news producer at USA Radio Network and as a news reporter for the Sacramento Union.

It’s a twist of irony: The Russian news website Pravda has published an accusation that the American media is “tame,” afraid to publish news and is “deliberately hiding the evidence published on the internet about [President Obama’s] defrauding of the American public and the deliberate evisceration of the Constitution of the United States.”

In a March 7 Pravda column, “Arizona sheriff finds Obama presidential qualifications forged,” Dianna Cotter, a senior at American Military University, blasts America’s mainstream media for their virtual silence about Maricopa County, Ariz., Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s six-month investigation into the controversy surrounding Obama’s birth certificate and his constitutional eligibility for office.

NOTE: In case you missed the news conference of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s “Cold Case Posse,” you can view it here.

“A singularly remarkable event has taken place in the United States of America,” Cotter wrote. “This event occurred in Arizona on March 1st and was an earth shattering revelation. Yet, in the five days since [Arpaio’s] revelations there has been little in the way of serious reporting on the findings he presented in his presser. With 6 short videos, the Sheriff and his team presented a devastating case, one the tame US press is apparently unable to report.”

Cotter recalls Obama April 27, 2011, press conference in which he “walked into the White House Press room with a Cheshire cat like grin and a ‘Long Form Birth Certificate’ from the State of Hawaii in hand.”

Speaking from the podium, Obama declared, “We’re not going to be able to solve our problems if we get distracted by sideshows and carnival barkers.”

“Quite the barb from a man holding a forged document,” Cotter wrote. “That’s right, forged.

She notes that the investigation also uncovered an allegedly forged Selective Service Card for Obama.

“Forged documents are being used to qualify a President of the United States for the office he holds,” she contends. “Or is usurped the more accurate term?

“The silence from the main stream media in the US is deafening. It almost seems as if the press is terrified to even think the question, let alone ask it: Is the President a criminal?

The press in Arpaio’s audience were certainly asking him to state precisely that, yet nowhere has the question been asked of the White House by the press. Instead the American Press is aggressively protecting the presumed President of the United States, pushing the fraud upon both America and the world, supporting a man who may well have usurped the office.”

She asks, “What has been the response from the Obama era press?


“Silence so loud it can be felt.”

Cotter lays out detailed evidence of a widespread cover-up and concludes:

The American Press is deliberately hiding the evidence published on the internet about this defrauding of the American public and the deliberate evisceration of the Constitution of the United States. It is hiding Barack Obama’s Fraud as it has been revealed by a Sheriff in Arizona. The silence of the American press would be unbelievable if it weren’t so blatantly obvious.

It is nearly as egregious as the audacity of Obama’s fraud itself.

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: ¿Cómo calificarías la gestión de Barack Obama en el últi


Obama & Rev. Wright by fourbyfourblazer

Obama's espiritual and    political  mentor, Rev. Wright, a rabid

racist and anti-american marxist says blacks  should not sing

"God Bless America" but    "God  da..mn America."

Obama's "christianity" is   based  on the marxist "black  liberation  theology" and the chief  architect and Rev. Wright’s mentor, James  Cone, argues that JesusChrist himself must have been black because “either God is  for black people in  their fight for liberation and  against the white  oppressors, or  he is not.” Mr.  Obama  spent 20 years  attending  Cone-protégé Wright’s church. Is it  possible that   one can attend a  church for 20 years and not be aware of the  theology that  animates  it? One is  left to wonder if the president is aware of James Cone’s incendiary statement in which  he  asserts  that

Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the  goals of the black  community. If  God is not for us and  against white  people, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill Gods  who do not belong to   the black community.


Wright- Kill whitey Pictures, Images and Photos  


Obama   embraces racist, Jew hating professor Derrick Bell  3/7/2012

So another radical named Derrick Bell was a  big time pal of Obama. Who was Derrick Bell? He’s dead now, but he was a professor of Law at  Harvard University. After leaving Harvard in 1992, he Bell wrote  a racialist, antisemitic essay called “The Space Traders” in 1994. HBO,  which currently employs misogynist “comedian” Bill  Maher, decided to turn  this loony essay into a documentary back in the 1990s.  The essay was about  space aliens coming to earth. Whites would “trade” blacks to  the space  aliens for gold to pay off the national debt. Bell said Jews would  just  stand by and watch. Charles Ogletree, Barack Obama’s mentor said “We hid  this throughout the 2008 campaign.” This proves yet again how corrupt the media is.

Derrick Bell also says that  Jews would only help blacks for a sense of self-preservation. Bell also  called Anne Frank “the symbol of Jewish  hypocrisy.”

So Obama was best buds with  yet  another anti-semite tied to Jeremiah Wright. But remember, he has  Israel’s back  right? Obama has Israel’s back alright. A knife in it.  Obama’s War on Jews  continues.

Mensajes: 137,145
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: ¿Cómo calificarías la gestión de Barack Obama en el últi

U.S. Economic Growth Now at 21-Month  Low

* Recession Due   by  November of 2012 *

* By: Larry Walker, Jr. * March    11/2012

“Are you cut out to live a lie? If   you  don't mind skulking around, leading a double life and constantly   having to look  over your shoulder to make sure you don't get found  out,  you may have just what  it takes.” ~ How to Live a  Lie  (eHow.com)

As I pointed out in War on Wealth, Part II | Keeping Our Foot  on  the  Gas, Barack Obama, the unopposed Democratic  presidential  nominee, has  been out on the campaign trail spreading  the following wildly  inaccurate  cliff-hangers. He says, “Manufacturing is coming back.  Companies are  starting to bring  jobs back. The economy is getting  stronger. The recovery is  speeding  up. We’re moving in the right  direction. And now we have to do   everything in our power to keep our foot  on the gas.”

But  according  to  the Economic Cycle Research Institute (ECRI), the same  crew who   predicted the last recession, U.S. economic growth is at  21-month low, and  we  are heading straight into another recession,  this year, in   2012.

ECRI is a private forecasting firm based   in  Manhattan which was founded by Geoffrey H. Moore, the economist  who  helped  originate the practice of using leading indicators to  predict  business cycles. Over  the  last 15 years, ECRI  has gotten all of its ecession calls right,  while  issuing no  false alarms.

In the institute’s view, the United   States,  which under the leadership of Barack Obama has failed to  recover  from the last downturn, is currently plummeting into a  new one. On  September 30,  2011, Lakshman Achuthan, the institute’s  chief operations  officer, said,” If  the United States isn’t  already in a recession now  it’s about to enter  one.”Mr.  Achuthan maintains this pposition to  this day. Here he is in a   February 24, 2012 interview on CNBC:

CNBC Video: U.S. Growth at   21-Month  Low.

Mensajes: 137,145
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: ¿Cómo calificarías la gestión de Barack Obama en el últi

part 2

In fact, if you carefully study the table  below, courtesy of the National Bureau of Economic Reserach, what should stand  out is the fact that, ever since 1945, the United States has averaged an  economic recession once every 59-month’s. Therefore, it is logical to  infer that since the last recession began in December of 2007, the next  recession should be arriving by November of 2012.

After the way Obama has divided and  driven the federal government and our nation into the ground over the last 37  month’s, can you imagine how he would act under the duress of a self-imposed  recession? More bailouts, never-ending stimulus, trillions more in crushing  debt, bigger deficits, numberless regulations, higher taxes, continued covering  of his tracks with a vast array of alibis and excuses, and more lies. Oops! Did  I say lies?

It’s been real  though, I mean the loss of almost a million manufacturing jobs since 2008; the  decline in economic growth from a peak annual rate of 3.0% in 2010, to just 1.7%  in 2011; the national debt as a percentage of GDP skyrocketing from 69.9% in  2008 to 104.8% in 2012, and projected to reach 107.8% by 2014; and lest we  forget, gasoline prices rising from an average price of $1.61 in the week ending  December 29, 2008, to $3.79  as of the week ending March 5, 2012. However, anyone who’s still considering Mr.  Obama’s re-election should take the time to study not only ECRI’s economic  indices, but also the eHow.com article, “How to Live a Lie” – because if you still believe in Obama there’s no sense in beating around the  Bush.


Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: ¿Cómo calificarías la gestión de Barack Obama en el últi

Obama's 2% Lie (Obama is a 100% walking lie)

by Gerri Willis | February 27, 2012

Gas prices shot up 18 cents on average nationwide over the past two weeks, according to the latest Lundberg survey.

That puts the average cost of regular gas at $3.69 a gallon. Of course, many of you around the country are already paying over $4.

President Obama, members of his administration, Democrats in Congress, and his allies on the left all make the same case: we can’t “drill our way” out of this problem.

They say we use a quarter of the world’s oil, but only have 2% of the world’s oil reserves. So, do the math. They say it’s impossible, but here’s how he gets to that mythical 2%.

For simplicity, we’ll call it Obama’s big oil lie because that’s what it is.

They’re only counting proven oil reserves.

The truth is that 2% oil reserves figure is whatever the government says it is.

Here’s the official definition from the non-partisan Congressional Research service.

Proven reserves are: “certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions.”

The key word there is “existing” conditions.

The U.S. has around 20 billion barrels in proven reserves, but the amount of undiscovered so called “technically recoverable” oil is over seven times that.

Those are the government’s own figures!

And we can get that oil using today’s technology. In fact, the U.S. has nearly 1.5 trillion barrels of oil.

That’s enough to fuel the present needs in the U.S. for around 250 years, according to the Institute for Energy Research.

Former President of Shell Oil on FBN earlier today on how we could easily get back to producing 10 million barrels a day:

“The best source for new oil is the world’s largest consumer economy: this country. We could go back to 10 million barrels if we had the permitting that would enable it to happen. We have the oil. There is more oil in this country that we’re not allowed to get at than oil we’re allowed to get at.”

But much of the oil is off limits thanks to the policies of this President:

-The outer Continental shelf.

-The Arctic National Wildlife Reserve in Anwar.

-And Shale Oil where the United States has the largest deposits in the world estimated by the government to be over 2 trillion barrels.

Even when the production is not in this country, the President will do anything he can to stop it, like blocking the Keystone pipeline.

Also, what the President is refusing to acknowledge is the United States is in the middle of an oil boom thanks to new technology like deep-water drilling in the Gulf of Mexico.

So the President needs to stop with the 2% lie.

The solutions are right in front of us, but this administration flatly refuses to explore them.

Mensajes: 137,145
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005


[ Editado ]

Daniel Greenfield  3,12, 2012

“History proves that the white man  is  a devil,” said Malcolm X. “Whites are  liars,” said Jeremiah Wright. “I love to harass  white folks,” said Derrick  Bell.

“This is what you deserve.  You  get what you deserve, white boy,” a black teenager said to  Allen Coon, a  white student on the porch of his own home, as he set him  on  fire.

“Don’ tell me words don’t  matter,” Obama once said. And he was right. Words do matter. The words  of  his mentors that have rooted hate so deep in the black community that  it has  become a cancer, a sore that bleeds violence, a stain on the   soul.  While white racism continues to decline year by year, black racism has advanced to the White House and  into the  hearts and minds of millions. It leads to everything from discrimination to murder. It led to a thirteen-year-old  boy screaming as fire  ate at the flesh of his face, burning away the white skin that his attackers had  been taught to hate so much.

“While city officials, state agencies, white liberals, and sober-minded Negroes stand idly by, a  group of  Negro dissenters is taking to street-corner step ladders, church  pulpits, sports  arenas, and ballroom platforms across the United States,  to preach a gospel of hate that would set off a federal investigation if  it were preached by Southern  whites.”

The year was 1959 and the voice was that of Mike Wallace.  Since then the “Gospel of Hate” has  become mainstream  in parts of the black community. Black leaders  like Jeremiah Wright have discarded the Black Muslim origins of their hate,  along with the tales of  UFOs and Mohammed, but have retained its deep-seated  venomous  racism.

The Nation of Islam, the subject of Wallace’s documentary, has won. Its Million Man March was the largest  organized show of political force by the black community in  decades. Its  breakaway activist, Malcolm X, has displaced Martin Luther King, as a political role model in the black community. Most of all its hate has become distilled  into the rhetoric and beliefs of even non-Muslim  clergy and scholars.

While we look at the hateful words of a Jeremiah Wright or a Derrick Bell who preach from the pulpit or propound from their ivory tower desks, we often ignore their impact on the ground floor of public life and what happens when their teachings trickle down to create an atmosphere of  oppression and hate.

Allen Coon, a 13-year-old  boy, was set on fire as a consequence of the mainstreaming of racism in  the black community to the extent that hatred for white people became a regular feature of  his classes at school.

“You’ve got to be taught, to hate and fear,” Lieutenant Cable hummed in Rodger and Hammerstein’s South  Pacific. “You’ve got to be taught, from year to year.”Allen's  assailants, who followed him home from school, poured gasoline on him and  flicked the lighter, had been carefully taught to hate by teachers in the  Kansas City public school system.Those teachers had also been taught to hate from year to year. The burns on the face of a thirteen-year-old  white boy did not emerge out of thin air.