¡Bienvenido a los Foros de Univision! Participa, intercambia mensajes privados, sube tus fotos y forma parte de nuestra Comunidad. | Ingresa | Regístrate Gratis
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009
0 Kudos


New film blasts Obama's Israel record

By Josh Rogin


The trailer for a new 30-minute video, entitled "Daylight: The Story of Obama and Israel," cuts together clips of Obama quotes and outside commentary to put forth the narrative that Obama has made statements and taken actions as president that have put him out of step with the government of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his supporters.


"We believe that that the borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines, "Obama is shown saying, a reference to his May, 2011 speech, where he for the first time explicitly defined U.S. policy as supporting the 1967 borders with agreed swaps as the basis for Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations.

"He didn't quite have a full grasp of what the full region looks like," conservative journalistLee Smith is shown saying in the video. "This is not how you treat an ally."

The ad goes beyond the Israeli issue to suggest that the president is too solicitous of Muslim concerns. The end of the trailer shows Obama saying, "I want to make sure we end before the call to prayer," a clip from his town hall meeting with Turkish students in Istanbul in April 2009.

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009



The video was produced by the group the Emergency Committee for Israel, which has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on its pre-AIPAC publicity campaign, including posters and billboards all over Washington that question Obama's commitment to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

"He says a nuclear Iran is unacceptable. Do you believe him?" the posters read. Then, next to a picture of Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khomeini and President Mahmoud Ahmedinejad, it says, "Do they?"

ECI is run by executive director Noah Pollak and Michael Goldfarb, a former McCain-Palin staffer now working at the consulting firm Orion Strategies and as chairman of the board of the Washington Free Beacon, an new conservative website.

"Obama says a nuclear Iran is unacceptable," Pollak told The Cabletoday. "We hope he means what he says, but the recent statements from his administration, his contentious relationship with the Israeli government, and his consistent efforts to weaken congressional sanctions don't inspire confidence."

The ECI board is comprised of Weekly StandardEditor Bill Kristol, Gary Bauer, who has endorsed Rick Santorum, and Rachel Abrams, the wife of former NSC official Elliott Abrams, and the author of the controversial Israel-focused blog "Bad Rachel." The group is also the only Israel-focused advocacy organization to have formed a SuperPAC in the run up to the 2012 election.

As part of its pre-AIPAC activity, ECI took out a full page ad in the New York Times yesterday calling out donors for supporting two liberal advocacy organizations in Washington, the Center for American Progress and Media Matters, and accusing those donors of "funding bigotry and anti-Israel extremism."

Pollak also said that the video, billboards, and ads happen to refute a pre-AIPAC interview Obama gave to The Atlantic, in which Obama expressed frustration with the attacks coming from conservative lawmakers and groups like ECI that claim he is not pro-Israel.

"Every single commitment I have made to the state of Israel and its security, I have kept," Obama said. "Why is it that despite me never failing to support Israel on every single problem that they've had over the last three years, that there are still questions about that?"

"Obama said today he doesn't understand why there are questions about his record of support for Israel," Pollak said. "We think this movie will set the record straight, and remind pro-Israel Americans of the facts of this administration's failure to stand with Israel at some critical moments."


(UPDATE: Now you can watch the entire 30 minute video here.)


Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009


[ Editado ]

Netanyahu Signals Israel Won't Sit  Back on Iran

By Katie Pavlich



Yesterday during his AIPAC speech, Prime Minister Benjamin  Netanyahu signaled his country will not sit back and watch as Iran obtains a  nuclear weapon, the same nuclear weapon Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would  surely use to eliminate the Jewish State. From Commentary:

“Unfortunately, Iran’s nuclear program continues  to march forward…We’ve waited for diplomacy to work. We’ve waited for sanctions  to work. None of us can afford to wait much longer. As prime minister of Israel,  I will never let my people live in the shadow of  annihilation.” No diplomacy and no  sanctions leave just one other option on the table. And the line at the end  shows that Netanyahu hasn’t made Obama any promises against taking unilateral  action. Later in the  speech, Netanyahu spoke about how America declined to bomb Auschwitz in 1944,  out of concern that “such an effort might provoke even more vindictive action by  the Germans.” “The American  government today is different,” continued Netanyahu. “You heard that from  President Obama’s speech yesterday. But here’s my point. The Jewish people are  also different. Today we have a state of our own. And the purpose of a Jewish  state is to ssecure Jewish lives and a Jewish future. Never again…We deeply  appreciate the great alliance between our two countries. But when it comes to  Israel’s survival, we must always remain the masters of our  fate.”

Yesterday during a meeting with Netanyahu, Obama said he hopes for more diplomacy while  Netanyahu made it clear Israel will do what it needs against Iran in order to  protect itself, with or without the United States.

Katie Pavlich the News Editor at  Townhall.com. Follow her on Twitter  @katiepavlich.              
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009


Unfortunately, anti-Semitism and anti-Catholicism exist even  today.  Certainly there was anti-Semitism at that time all around the  world, but it was not mainly from Catholics and much less from the Catholic  Church.  Germany was not alone; there was plenty of anti-Semitism in the  highest spheres of the Allied governments.


Jewish historian Richard Breitman has written five books, one  on the Holocaust and another on Nazism.  He is, up to this day, the only  person authorized to study the OSS secret documents of U.S. espionage during  WWII.  The Italian newspaper “Corriere della Sera.” interviewed him on June  29, 2000.  In the article, Breitman not only confirms the role played by  Pius XII in defending and safeguarding the persecuted during the Nazi regime but  he also found “the Allied silence on the Holocaust surprising.  Their first  testimonies are from the end of 1942…” He also remarked that the documents  denoted how the Nazis considered that the Vatican was in the side of the Allies.  (10)


The reaction of the US, French and British governments at that  time, and even later, when knowledge of the concentration camps existed, were  certainly not in solidarity for the persecuted Jews.  In the middle of the  genocide, Britain closed the doors of Palestine to the Jews. The U.S. government  accepted a total of 10,000-15,000 Jewish refugees throughout the war – a truly  scandalous statistic.


Jewish leaders ask Allies to bomb railway lines to  concentration camps


The posturing with strong public declarations followed by the  empty deeds of the allied leaders did not save any Jewish lives.  On June  6, 1944, Dr. Chaim Weizmann, the well known Zionist leader, later president of  Israel, proposed to the British Minister, Anthony Eden, that the railway line to  Auschwitz should be bombed.  The British, after consultation, denied the  request alleging the “great technical difficulties involved.” As the Jews died  by the thousands daily, why was there not a rescue plan on the Allied side to  counter the Nazi machinery of extermination?  The Allies had already  dropped tens of thousands of bombs on German cities. Why was that simple request  which would have saved hundreds of thousands Jews and Christians refused? Later  on, J.F. Martin, chief private secretary of Winston Churchill, explained “the  great technical difficulties.”   In a letter to Dr. Weizmann he wrote  that they had discussed the matter with the Soviets and that the Soviets vetoed  it.


When the evacuation of over 60,000 Jews from Bulgaria was  suggested, Eden replied that the whole problem with the Jews was very  difficult.  “If we do that (said Eden) then the Jews of the world will be  wanting us to make similar offers in Poland and Germany.” (11)


In 1943, there was a memorandum from British embassy sent to  the U.S. State Department expressing their fear that the Germans may “change  over from a policy of extermination to one of extrusion, and  aim, as they did before the war, at embarrassing other countries by flooding  them with refugees.”  The State Department blocked, with Roosevelt’s  connivance, efforts in Congress to help the Jewish refugees on their way to  Palestine. (12)


El presidente Truman que era tan anti-semita como FDR apoyó la  fundación del estado de Israel para evitar tener que recibirlos en Estados  Unidos. No olvidemos que FDR le negó la entrada a los judíos que huían de los  nazis e Inglaterra les cerró la entrada a Palestina.  Sin embargo, con 20  divisiones alemanas en la frontera de Francia con España, el dictador Francisco  se nego permitir que cruzaran para tomar Gibraltar mientras que le concedía la  ciudadanía española a todos los judíos sefarditas que vivían en la Europa  ocupada por los nazis en su condición de descendientes de los judíos  expulsados en 1492 de España salvandole así la vida de mas de 60,000 judíos que  encontraron refugio en España.