"RMONEY" - HOMOPHOBE, SOCIOPATH, LIAR
2. I like torturing my dog till it shits itself in fear
3. I like attacking a fellow student and cutting his hair off with shears
4. I like to walk blind people into doors
5. I like to give away free SLC Olympics Tickets to my pals instead of widows and orphans of 9/11
This sick mofo needs to be put in a nice rest home somewhere and given lots of shock treatments
God forbid this louse ever gets within pissing distance of the Oval Office
Publicado: 05-10-2012 07:58 PM
Obama and Emanuel: Members of same gay bath house in Chicago President Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel are lifetime members of the same gay bath house in uptown Chicago, according to informed sources in Chicago’s gay community, as well as veteran political sources in the city. The bath house, Man’s Country, caters to older white men and it has been in business for some 30 years and is known as one of uptown Chicago’s “grand old bathhouses.” WMR was told by sources who are familiar with the bath house that it provides one-year “lifetime” memberships to paying customers and that the club’s computerized files and pre-computer paper files, include membership information for both Obama and Emanuel. The data is as anonymized as possible for confidentiality purposes. However, sources close to “Man’s Country” believe the U.S. Secret Service has purged the computer and filing cabinet files of the membership data on Obama and Emanuel. Members of Man’s Country are also issued club identification cards. WMR learned that Obama and Emanuel possessed the ID cards, which were required for entry. Obama began frequenting Man’s Country in the mid-1990s, during the time he transitioned from a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School to his election as an Illinois State Senator in 1996. Emanuel, reportedly joined Man’s Country after he left the Clinton White Hosue and moved back to Chicago in 1998, joining the investment firm of Wasserstein Perella and maintaining his membership during his 2002 campaign for the U.S. 5th District House seat vacated by Rod Blagojevich, who was elected governor. Man’s Country appears to be a “one stop shopping” center for gay men. The club’s website advertises steam rooms, “fantasy rooms,” bed rooms, male strippers, adult movies, and lockers. However, Man’s Country was not the only location for Obama’s predatory gay SX activities. The Chicago gay community is aware that Obama often made contacts with younger men at his famous “pick-up basketball” games. It was at these “pick up” matches where Obama first met Emanuel and a young Democratic campaign worker and senior bank vice president named Alexi Giannoulias. Currently running for Obama’s old U.S. Senate seat now occupied by Roland Burris, Giannoulias successfully ran for Illinois Treasurer in 2006 after being drafted for the run by Chicago’s Democratic machine.
Publicado: 05-10-2012 09:36 PM
OBAMA, THE BLACK PANTHERS AND THE CALL FOR WHITE GENOCIDE
AQUI LOS UNICOS QUE PLANEAN UNA REVOLUCION RACIAL SON LOS SICARIOS DE OBAMA, LOS BLACK PANTHERS!!!
OBAMA ATIZANDO LA GUERRA DE CLASE Y EL ODIO RACIAS EN UN RALLY DE LAS PANTERAS NEGRAS
New Black Panther's Cracker Killer's latest training video...cute!
EXTERMINATE WHITE PEOPLE!!!
Publicado: 05-12-2012 11:49 AM
EN LAS PRIMARIAS DEMOCRATAS EN WEST VIRGINA, 41% DE LOS DEMOCRATAS PREFIRIERON VOTAR POR UN DELINCUENTE PRESO EN TEXAS QUE VOTAR POR OBAMA!!!
OBAMA CHALLENGED IN ARK.DEMOCRATIC PRIMARIES
Obscure candidate in Ark. optimistic after poll shows him at 7 POINTS in competitive race with Obama
You haven’t heard of John Wolfe because the obscure Democratic candidate for president has raised less than $500, can’t afford radio or TV ads and hasn’t gotten much press.
Yet miraculously, a poll released this week shows Wolfe trailing President Barack Obama in the Arkansas Democratic primary — occurring next week — by just seven points.
In an interview with The Daily Caller on Wednesday, Wolfe described his barebones campaign, saying he thinks the shocking poll numbers in Arkansas are the result of an anybody-but-Obama attitude. He’s optimistic he could pull off an upset.
“I think there’s a chance,” said Wolfe, who is the only person appearing on the Democratic ballot for president with Obama in Arkansas.
BYE, BYE, BARACK MONDALE!!!
Publicado: 05-16-2012 08:55 PM
Recent News Could Cause Panic for Obama Campaign
By Michael Barone
Is it panic time at Obama headquarters in Chicago? You might get that impression from watching events -- and the polls -- over the past few weeks.
In matchups against Mitt Romney, the president is leading by only 47 to 45 percent in the realclearpolitics.com average of recent polls. A CBS/New York Times panelback poll, in which interviewers call back respondents to a previous survey, showed Romney leading 46 to 43 percent -- and leading among women.
That's despite the Democrats' charge that Republicans are waging a "war on women" by opposing requirements that all health insurance policies provide free contraceptives. Evidently that's not the only issue on the minds of American women.
Or consider the clumsiness of Obama's announcement a week ago that after "evolving" he is now in favor of same-**noallow** marriage.
This was clearly not rolled out according to some long-term plan. On Sunday, May 6, Joe Biden told "Meet the Press" that he was "absolutely comfortable" with same-**noallow** marriage. On Monday, press secretary Jay Carney was so battered with questions about the issue that he cancelled the daily press briefing for Tuesday.
Then, at a hastily arranged interview with ABC News on Wednesday, Obama announced his switch.
As a supporter of same-**noallow** marriage, I am glad that Obama took the step that *beep* Cheney took several years ago. Like many Americans, he changed his mind at some point and supported a policy that almost no one backed a quarter-century ago.
Recent polls report that about half of Americans now back same-**noallow** marriage. True, voters in North Carolina on Tuesday voted to ban same-**noallow** marriage by a 61 to 39 percent margin. But only a few years ago, any political pro would have been astonished to see the issue get 39 percent support in a state where 44 percent of voters are white evangelical Protestants.
And some same-**noallow** marriage supporters may be grumbling that even more would have done so if Obama had made his announcement one day before the vote rather than one day after.
Obama was facing a tough political choice on the issue. He needs two groups of voters who often don't turn out in large numbers to do so this fall: blacks and young voters. Young Americans tend to favor same-**noallow** marriage by wide margins. Black Americans have tended to oppose it by wide margins (though not as wide this month in North Carolina, it seems, as in California in 2008, where 70 percent voted against it).
By saying he was still against same-**noallow** marriage but was "evolving" on the issue, Obama sought to avoid riling black voters while giving a wink to young voters hinting he shared their view.
He was in the **noallow** of the old-time pol who said, "Some of my friends are for the bill, and some of my friends are against the bill, and I'm always with my friends."
Particularly the friends with money. The Washington Post reported that one of out six Obama "bundlers," people who bring in large amounts of campaign dollars, identify themselves as gay.
Probably not all of them consider same-sx marriage a top-priority issue. But many undoubtedly do, and Obama has surely heard from them at the fundraisers he so frequently attends.
On another issue, Obama sided with rich liberal contributors by blocking construction of the Keystone XL pipeline to bring Canadian oil to the United States. He did so even though energy is a big issue and large majorities of voters favor the pipeline.
On same-sx marriage, the political calculation is closer. For one thing, it's a low-priority issue for most voters.
I think Obama's switch will help him significantly with young voters. And he has been doing conference calls with black ministers to mollify them in the hope they'll turn out their followers despite his stand.
But Gallup reports that 26 percent of voters say they're less likely to vote for him because of this issue, exactly twice the 13 percent who say they're more likely to do so.
And the CBS/New York Times panelback showed 67 percent saying he made his decision "mostly for political reasons," while only 24 percent say he did so "mostly because he thinks it is right."
That's a harshly negative result. It suggests that most voters see the president, on this issue at least, as opportunistic rather than sincere. That's good reason for panic.
Publicado: 05-17-2012 09:50 AM
“FORWARD”, EL LEMA DE LA CAMPAÑA DE OBAMA
por Frank de Varona
El lema “Forward” (Adelante) fue adoptado por el presidente Barack Obama para su campaña de reelección el 30 de abril de 2012 y dado a conocer en un video de siete minutos. Este nuevo eslogan reemplaza al “Hope and Change” (Esperanza y Cambio) de la campaña de 2008. El uso del lema “Adelante” pudiera ser una táctica para complacer a los marxistas, socialistas y otros radicales que lo apoyan. Tal vez piensa que el pueblo estadounidense no se dará cuenta de lo que este eslogan significa.
Los que conocen de historia, y en particular la historia del comunismo, saben que “Adelante” es un eslogan marxista que se ha venido usando desde el siglo XIX. La enciclopedia Wikipedia del Internet tiene una página que explica el significado especial que tiene este lema y su frecuente uso en periódicos y revistas comunistas, socialistas y radicales por todo el mundo.
Victor Morton del periódico Washington Times explica que el lema “Adelante” expresa “la convicción de los marxistas europeos y los radicales que sus movimientos reflejan la marcha de la historia pasando del capitalismo hacia el socialismo y comunismo”. El artículo de Wikipedia describe que existió una revista en París en la década de 1840 llamada VORWÄRTS! (palabra alemana que significa adelante). Tenía de escritores a Karl Marx y Friederich Engels y los lectores eran alemanes revolucionarios que se habían refugiado en Francia. Posteriormente otra revista con el mismo nombre, pero sin el signo de exclamación, fue fundada por el Partido Social Demócrata en Alemania en 1876. El nombre “Adelante” se usó por todo el mundo por socialistas y marxistas. Vladimir Lenin fundó la revista VPERED (palabra rusa para adelante) en 1905. Más adelante el Partido Comunista de Portugal creó su revista Avante! y el Partido Socialista de Italia llama a su publicación oficial Avanti!.
Barack Obama dijo unos días antes de ser electo presidente en 2008 que él quería transformar fundamentarme a nuestra nación. Desgraciadamente esta fue una de las pocas promesas que ha cumplido. Ha nombrado muchos zares radicales a la Casa Blanca, que ejercen sus funciones con un poder extraordinario, sin responder al Congreso ni haber sido confirmados por el Senado. Lo que nunca hizo otro presidente en nuestra historia, Obama nombró a un comunista, Van Jones, como zar de Trabajos Verdes. Obama ha nombrado socialistas, marxistas y radicales en muchos de los departamentos y agencias del gobierno. Ignora la Constitución y declara la guerra a la Iglesia católica. Su política económica de déficits excesivos y gran aumento de la deuda nacional nos va a llevar a la bancarrota y quiere que dejemos de ser una superpotencia mundial. Nos está llevando rápidamente hacia el socialismo. Al mismo tiempo Obama apoya a los radicales que destruyen propiedades y cometen crímenes en nuestras grandes ciudades y que expresan su odio contra los ricos y las corporaciones, tal como lo hizo su pastor Jeremiah Wright.
En su campaña actual Obama demoniza a los ricos y usa la lucha de clases para dividirnos. Como expliqué en mi libro, El verdadero Obama, nuestro presidente ha estado toda su vida asociado con marxistas, socialistas y radicales al igual que con terroristas como Bill Ayers, quien junto con su esposa pertenecieron a una organización que puso bombas por los Estados Unidos.
Con su nuevo lema “Adelante” está bien claro hacia donde nos quiere llevar Obama a paso acelerado si triunfa en las elecciones.
05-18-2012 09:19 AM - editado 05-18-2012 09:20 AM
THE TEST OF FIRE FOR CATHOLICS: ELECTION 2012
Published on Mar 10, 2012 by creativelab7
Will you vote the values that will stand the test of fire? Some things are more important than high gas prices or a faltering economy. They are life, marriage and freedom. This November, Catholics must stand up and protect their sacred rights and duties.
Publicado: 05-18-2012 03:48 PM
The Potemkin President Disintegrates
By Bruce Thornton On May 21, 2012 In Daily Mailer,FrontPage
After nearly four years in office, the tinsel and cardboard persona of Barack Obama is starting to fall apart. The political unifier who claimed, “There is not a liberal America and a conservative America––there is the United States of America,” has been exposed as one of the most divisive and partisan presidents of modern times. The post-racial candidate who supposedly transcended our racial divisions has intensified them, whether by crudely racializing incidents like the Trayvon Martin shooting, or by allowing the Justice Department to facilitate race-industry attacks on state voter-identification laws, or by calling his own grandmother “a typical white person” for fearing black criminals.
The decrier of how money has corrupted our politics has spent more time at the campaign contribution trough than he has governing. The “centrist” who set aside partisan politics for the greater national good has been exposed as a doctrinaire progressive adept at bare-knuckled class warfare. And the “smartest guy ever to become President,” as one historically challenged historian put it, has turned out to be remarkably ignorant about a multitude of issues from the economy to foreign policy.
Yet we didn’t need the past three years to learn the truth about Obama. The evidence was all there from the start. What allowed the fantasy Obama to gain the White House was the collusion of a corrupt mainstream media that failed to ask the hard questions or follow through on stories that had managed to get the nation’s attention. The recent revelation from the Breitbart outfit that a publisher’s promotional booklet in 1991 bragged that Obama had been “born in Kenya” is just the latest evidence of how stubbornly and willfully indifferent the media have been to asking the penetrating questions of the sort that have dogged every president, especially those since Lyndon Johnson.
The media’s dereliction of duty has allowed Obama to construct ad hoc identities that suit his political agenda and obscure his unsavory past and ideology. For example, the continuing questions about Obama’s birth-country renewed by the Breitbart discovery are significant for exposing his long history of fabricating an identity to suit his careerist needs. The Hawaii prep-schooled, white-raised Barry Dunham discovered on getting to college that the exotic name Barack Hussein Obama, like the Indonesian childhood, was more useful for sending a diversity thrill down the leg of liberal white professors and admissions committees. So too with publishers, eager to display their multi-culti bona fides by promoting a Third-World author “born in Kenya,” who would chronicle his struggles against neo-colonial racism. Like many other hustlers “of color,” Obama was no doubt happy to oblige and collude in the deception––until national political ambitions required that he tone down the “other” vibe, at least until after the election.
So too with the unasked questions about Obama’s radical past. The media saw nothing to report about Obama starting his political career in the living room of ex-terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn. You remember Ayers, the ex-Weatherman who bragged in his memoirs about getting away with his terrorist violence and being “free as a bird.” Obama assured us that Ayers was “just a guy who lives in my neighborhood,” despite serving on two foundation boards and appearing at conferences with him. As is the media’s wont, perfunctory “investigations” revealed that there was nothing to the stories, taking on faith Obama’s incredible assertion that there was no significance to the fact that one of America’s most notorious terrorists was a part of his life and political development.
The same media that ran with a hit-piece on George Bush supported only by an obviously fabricated letter, and that currently is intensely picking over the past history of Bain Capital, Romney’s treatment of the family dog, and his alleged high-school bullying––that same media four years ago didn’t think there was anything newsworthy in the Democratic candidate for president having ties with an unrepentant left-wing terrorist. Instead, they helped construct Obama’s new identity as a pragmatic centrist beyond partisan politics.
Then there’s the Reverend Jeremiah “God-damn America” Wright, whom Obama credits with leading him to Christianity, who officiated at his wedding, who gave him the title of his second book, and whose church he attended for 20 years. When the videos of Wright’s sermons surfaced, Obama claimed that he was “shocked, shocked” by the rancid anti-Americanism and racism weekly preached by Wright, and the media accepted that preposterous rationalization.
Obama's espiritual and political mentor, Rev.Wright, a rabidracist and anti-american marxist says blacks should God Bless America" but "God da..mn America."
Obama needed to be a mainstream post-racialist Christian for the election, so the media were happy to help him throw his one-time spiritual mentor under the bus. Once again, none of those intrepid “watchdog” reporters from the legacy media were interested in digging for the true Obama, and in stripping away the carefully constructed façade to find out what, if anything, Obama sincerely believed in. All they needed to know was that he was going to “fundamentally transform America” into the progressive paradise. Like Lincoln Steffens on the train heading for the Soviet Union, the facts could be damned: the media had already seen the future, and it worked.
And this is just the beginning of the Obama mysteries left unexamined by the media. Why has the guy whose “I.Q. is off the charts,” as that same historian claimed, refused to release his college transcripts? Is there something in his course-work and grades that could explain the numerous historical gaffes, such as his assertion in the 2009 Cairo speech that Muslims were practicing tolerance in Cordoba centuries after they had been driven out by the Spaniards, or his repetition of internet apocryphal history, as when he claimed President Rutherford B. Hayes had dismissed the telephone’s future, when in fact he installed the first telephone in the White House? Is there some transcript evidence that illuminates the source of howlers such as “57” states or the “Austrian” language? Why have a media that reveled in documenting daily George Bush’s alleged stupidity maintained a studied indifference to this genius’s academic record? Or why, in this age of meticulous intrusion into every last detail of a politician’s life and health, has Obama’s complete medical records been kept secret? What doesn’t he want us to see? Why can’t we read the Columbia thesis of this universally acknowledged “brilliant” writer? Why did he receive “foreign student aid”?
Why, as Roger Kimball asks, are his Illinois state senate schedule and records, Selective Service registration, and law practice client list all sealed? Perhaps there are innocuous reasons for all this secrecy, but no other candidate for the most powerful political job in the world would ever be allowed to keep this information.
Publicado: 05-21-2012 11:13 AM