¡Bienvenido a los Foros de Univision! Participa, intercambia mensajes privados, sube tus fotos y forma parte de nuestra Comunidad. | Ingresa | Regístrate Gratis
Responder
Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

no hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver

CURL: Can you really afford four more years?

Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: no hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver

Anatomy of a Failing Presidency

An article from American Thinker by Geoffrey P. Hunt

 

Barack Obama is on track to have the most spectacularly failed presidency since Woodrow Wilson. In the modern era, we've seen several failed presidencies--led by Jimmy Carter and LBJ. Failed presidents have one strong common trait-- they are repudiated, in the vernacular, spat out.

Of course, LBJ wisely took the exit ramp early, avoiding a shove into oncoming traffic by his own party. Richard Nixon indeed resigned in disgrace, yet his reputation as a statesman has been partially restored by his triumphant overture to China .

But, Barack Obama is failing. Failing big. Failing fast. And failing everywhere: foreign policy, domestic initiatives, and most importantly, in forging connections with the American people.

The incomparable Dorothy Rabinowitz in the Wall Street Journal put her finger on it: He is failing because he has no understanding of the American people, and may indeed loathe them. Fred Barnes of the Weekly Standard says he is failing because he has lost control of his message, and is overexposed. Clarice Feldman of American Thinker produced a dispositive commentary showing that Obama is failing because fundamentally he is neither smart nor articulate; his intellectual dishonesty is conspicuous by its audacity and lack of shame.

But, there is something more seriously wrong: How could a new president riding in on a wave of unprecedented promise and goodwill have forfeited his tenure and become a lame duck in six months? His poll ratings are in free fall. In generic balloting, the Republicans have now seized a five point advantage. This truly is unbelievable. What's going on?

No narrative. Obama doesn't have a narrative. No, not a narrative about himself. He has a self-narrative, much of it fabricated, cleverly disguised or written by someone else. But this self-narrative is isolated and doesn't connect with us. He doesn't have an American narrative that draws upon the rest of us.

All successful presidents have a narrative about the American character that intersects with their own where they display a command of history and reveal an authenticity at the core of their personality that resonates in a positive endearing way with the majority of Americans. We admire those presidents whose narratives not only touch our own, but who seem stronger, wiser, and smarter than we are. Presidents we admire are aspirational peers, even those whose politics don't align exactly with our own: Teddy Roosevelt, FDR, Harry Truman, Ike, and Reagan.

But not this president. It's not so much that he's a phony, knows nothing about economics, and is historically illiterate and woefully small minded for the size of the task--all contributory of course. It's that he's not one of us. And whatever he is, his profile is fuzzy and devoid of content, like a cardboard cutout made from delaminated corrugated paper.

Moreover, he doesn't command our respect and is unable to appeal to our own common sense. His notions of right and wrong and how things work are repugnant just don't add up. They are not existential. His descriptions of the world we live in don't make sense and don't correspond with our experience.

In the meantime, while we've been struggling to take a measurement of this man, he's dissed just about every one of us -- financiers, energy producers, banks, insurance executives, police officers, doctors, nurses, hospital administrators, post office workers, and anybody else who has a non-green job. Expect Obama to lament at his last press conference in 2012: "For those of you I offended, I apologize. For those of you who were not offended, you just didn't give me enough time; if only I'd had a second term, I could have offended you too."

Mercifully, the Founders at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 devised a useful remedy for such a desperate state--staggered terms for both houses of the legislature. An equally abominable Congress can get voted out next year. With a new Congress, there's always hope of legislative gridlock until we vote for president again two short years after that.

"The more corrupt the state, the more it legislates." - Tacitus

"A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own." - Unknown

Retirado
sirjohn
Mensajes: 137,145
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: no hay peor ciego que el que no quiere ver

[ Editado ]

OBAMA YOU ARE DESPICABLE​, STOP  APOLOGISIN​G FOR AMERICA!!!

 

Obama Apology Stirs up More  Violence!

President Obama is apologizing for America... again. And it  worsened over the weekend. Following the inadvertent  burning of the Koran at a U.S. military base in Afghanistan on the same day we  learned that two U.S. soldiers were killed by an Afghan National Army soldier,  President Obama and his team unleashed a flood of apologies to Afghan and Muslim  leaders. The apologies came from the President as well as  Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter.  Meanwhile, Muslim radicals who have willingly burned the American flag have  taken to the streets shouting, "Death To America!' And the violence has only  escalated and now four U.S. troops are dead and at least 7 injured with no end  in sight. + + Krauthammer: Obama  "embarrassing" Fox News' Charles Krauthammer  called the Obama apology "embarrassing":

“We have gone from apology here to abject self-debasement and  groveling. And groveling to whom? To the mob. We should've had a single apology  from the commander on the ground and that's it. Not from the Secretary of  Defense. Not from the President, of all people.”

Beyond the embarrassment is the weakening of America that  takes place when our President over-apologizes to those who hate our country and  burn our flag. + + Citizens Say: "Stop Apologizing  For America!" This is the latest in a long line  of apologies from Obama. Our President has spent much of the past three years  apologizing for our nation's greatness. It's time Americans tell Obama -- "Stop  Apologizing For America!"

Grassfire Nation is launching a nationwide “Stop  Apologizing For America” Citizen Statement to President Obama. Please go here to sign the Citizen Statement  now.

+ + Obama Calls America "Dismissive" and  'Derisive" Who can forget his first trip to  Europe in April 2009 when Obama openly criticized our country:

“In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading  role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to  partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America  has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.”

Standing on French soil -- where freedom was won and Hitler's  national socialist regime turned back in large part because of the ultimate  sacrifice of thousands of U.S. soldiers who are buried in that country -- Obama  called us “arrogant”.... “dismissive” and “derisive.” These never ending apologies weaken our nation. As I noted above,  Obama's latest apology was greeted with more rioting in the streets and refrains  of "Death To America!" + + Obama lauds his Muslim  upbringing, casts blame on U.S. for actions post-9/11 Then in July 2009, Obama toured the Middle East (without visiting  Israel) and gave his major address on U.S.-Middle East relations in Cairo.  During that speech, Obama lauded his own Muslim roots, referenced the "Holy  Koran" and spoke of Islam as a "revealed" faith. He even featured a Muslim story  that equates Mohammed with Moses and Jesus. Then, he  addressed 9/11 in a way that gave credence to those who blame America for those  tragic, unprovoked attacks, before throwing our nation under the bus for  post-9/11 actions:

“I am aware that some question or justify the events of 9/11,” Obama said before apologizing for America: “The fear and anger that [9/11]  provoked was understandable, but in some cases, it led us to act contrary to our  ideals.”

Even in complimenting our nation, Obama goes on the attack.  This from September 30 of last year:

“This is a great, great country that had gotten a little soft  and, you know, we didn't have that same competitive edge that we needed over the  last couple of decades. We need to get back on track.”

Obama even blamed our Founding Fathers for his inability to “implement” his agenda:

“I have not been able to force Congress to implement every  aspect of what I said in 2008…. It turns out that our founders designed a system  that makes it more difficult to bring about change than I would like  sometimes.”

+ + Obama Apologies Weaken AmericaOn the same day we learned that two U.S. soldiers were killed by  a man wearing an Afghan military uniform, Obama and his team roll out extended  apologies for an accidental disposal of the Koran! Such  apologies only serve to weaken our nation on the world stage and put our troops  at risk -- which is precisely what is happening right now. That is why the  American people must rise up and say “Enough!” We will  deliver these petitions to the White House and announce the results to the  national media through our Liberty News network. Thanks for the stand you are taking with Grassfire Nation! Steve Elliott Grassfire Nation

 

New Pew survey: Obama losing ground among Catholic,  Jewish, Protestant and even atheist voters Coach is Right ^ | 2/29/2012 | Kevin "Coach"  Collins

 

Obama Vacation Spending

 

According to a Pew poll released earlier this month even  before Barack Obama went public with his all-out war on the Catholic Church  White non-Hispanic Catholics started moving away from the Democrats and toward a  Republican self-identification.

The quietly released survey, which contains lots of bad news  for Democrats, was completed last December by the Pew Forum on Religion &  Public Life.

What Pew found was as follows.

The Democrat identification all Catholics (practicing and non- practicing) had in 2008 is gone. Democrat identification has slipped from 53/37  to 48/43 – again this was BEFORE Obama’s declaration of war.

While this general trend should be enough to cause alarm for  Democrats, digging a bit deeper brings worse news. Among White non-Hispanic  Catholics – who make up a much larger portion of those who will actually vote- the numbers have reversed to a 49/42 Republican advantage. Moreover Democrats  are now even upside down among non-practicing Catholics falling to a 47/45 GOP  advantage.

It’s not just Catholics who have moved from the Democrats and  toward the Republicans.

Pew tells us Democrats have lost and Republicans have gained  ground with all religious groups. Among Jewish voters there has been a 9 point  shift and among Mormons...

 

Retirado
sirjohn
Mensajes: 137,145
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: No me gusta Obama, pero no veo como pueda perder

OBAMA'S BIRTH CERTIFICATE DEEMED A FRAUD BY SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO'S COLD CASE POSSE

WebToday | 3-1-12 | Jerry McGlothlin

 

Live streaming is currently underway of Sheriff Joe Arpaio's news conference that has concluded that Barack Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate was a fraud! Sheriff Arpaio's cold posse investigators presented a visual side by side comparison of Obama's purported Long Form Birth Certificate with the investigators own recreation of an Optical Character Recognition (OCR) enhancement to see if there were any possibility of the birth certificate being legitimate. However it become clear that the long form birth certificate was a fraud.

The register stamp and date stamp were a safety feature to verify the authenticity of the document. But the fact that those stamps were imported from an outside source shows with certainty that it was fraudulent since those 'safety verification stamps were completely moveable to any point of the document. No original birth certificate circa the date of Obama's birth could possibly have had such movable computerized elements.

After concluding conclusively that that Obama's birth certificate was a fraud, then the investigators moved on to the issue of Obama's place of birth, investigating allegations that Obama was born abroad. They said that when they went through the airline travel documents for the time of his birth had a strategic missing number of documents during the time of Obama's alleged birth, indicative of someone removing records to impede an investigation.

The investigators then showed Obama's purported Selective Service card was fraudulent in that there was a collage of pica date stamps and the investigators were able to recreate the counterfeiting process that was identical to the counterfeited Selective Service card. The lead investigator concluded, "The document is fake. The representations of the document are fake," adding that a person of interest is being investigated who may have administrated this colossal fraud.

Then Dr. Jerome Corsi was introduced and is in the process of making his presentation at the time of this WebToday.tv upload.

Retirado
sirjohn
Mensajes: 137,145
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: No me gusta Obama, pero no veo como pueda perder

Obama's Campaign Bully Brigade  Rides Again

By Michelle Malkin

3/2/2012

 

They're baaaaaaack. Barack Obama's election-year goon squad  kicked into high gear this week by kicking the president's fiercest opponents in  the teeth and targeting their pocketbooks. Returning to bully business as usual,  the Obama campaign launched a brazen salvo against two prominent conservative  critics and their legions of private citizen donors.

Let's be clear (to use Obama's favorite phrase): This  is not just the politics of personal destruction. It's a vendetta of campaign  finance destruction. Under the guise of "disclosure," Team  Obama is exploiting the power of high government office to intimidate lawful,  peaceful contributors who support limited-government  causes.

In a scathing fundraising e-mail appeal, Obama campaign  manager Jim Messina name-checked wealthy free-market philanthropists Charles and  David Koch -- along with a growing movement of grassroots conservatives who have  freely, voluntarily and legally given money to the Koch-founded nonprofit  activist group Americans for Prosperity and its sister foundation. As a speaker  at several AFP events over the past three years, I've met thousands of  like-minded, hardworking Americans who support their work at the local, state  and federal levels.

The Koches' sins are to 1. follow tax law and protect the  identities of donors to their charitable organizations, and 2. exercise their  free speech by funding advocacy ads informing the public about the Obama  administration's jobs toll destruction and failed green energy "investments."  (Their most recent TV spot zeroed in on the taxpayer-funded Solyndra  bankruptcy.)

"When you attempt to drown out (Americans') voices through  unlimited, secret contributions to pursue a special-interest agenda that  conflicts with what's best for our nation, you must expect some scrutiny of your  actions," Messina railed. The threat of scrutiny was backed by Obama himself,  whose official campaign Twitter account directed 12 million-plus followers this  week to "add your name to demand that the Koch brothers make their donors  public."

But Obama's own former top officials run a so-called super PAC  (Priorities USA) that also maintains nonprofit status and subsidizes advocacy  ads while protecting its donor base. The White House, of course, is mum on the  unlimited, secret contributions that Obama is now encouraging wealthy liberals  and lobbyists to make in pursuit of his own special-interest agenda -- i.e.,  re-election.

The president's flapping lips are also sealed when it comes to  applying his disclosure standards to the shadowy, George Soros-backed Center for  American Progress, which has supplied the Obama administration with countless  top policy staffers, including special Department of Health and Human Services  assistant Michael Halle and HHS Director Jeanne Lambrew, a former senior fellow  at the Center for American Progress. CAP founder John Podesta was Obama's  transition chief, overseeing the backroom process of rewarding friends and  allies with plum positions. CAP flacks shrugged off conflict-of-interest  questions: "We respect the privacy of supporters who have chosen not to make  their donations public," CAP spokeswoman Jennifer Palmieri said.

As for respecting the privacy rights of Obama's foes? Not so  much.

It seems to me no small coincidence that this disclosure  charade comes just as numerous tea party organizations are reporting that the  Internal Revenue Service has targeted them for audits. According to Colleen  Owens of the Richmond (Va.) Tea Party, several fiscal-conservative activist  groups in Virginia, Hawaii, Ohio and Texas have received a spate of IRS letters.  The missives demand extensive requests to identity volunteers, board members and  ... donors.

This is B.O.'s M.O. His bully brigade did the same to the U.S.  Chamber of Commerce and its donors during the November 2010 midterms as payback  for the organization's ads opposing the federal health care takeover. And in  2008, Obama's allies at a Soros-tied outfit sent out "warning" letters to 10,000  top GOP givers "hoping to create a chilling effect that will dry up  contributions." Witch hunt leader Tom Matzzie, formerly of Soros-funded  MoveOn.org, bragged of "going for the jugular" and said the warning letter was  just the first step, "alerting donors who might be considering giving to  right-wing groups to a variety of potential dangers, including legal trouble,  public exposure and watchdog groups digging through their lives."

Matzzie also advertised a $100,000 bounty for dirt on  conservative political groups "to create a sense of scandal around the groups"  and dissuade donors from giving money. The effort was cheered by Accountable  America adviser Judd Legum, founder of Think Progress -- the same group that led  the attack on the Chamber of Commerce and is run by Podesta's Center for  American Progress. Just as with the Obama super PAC led by former White House  officials, Matzzie's group "Accountable America" was a 501(c)(4) nonprofit  entity that shielded the identity of its donors.

Oh, and remember this? In 2008, St. Louis County Circuit  Attorney Bob McCulloch and St. Louis City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, both  Obama promoters, threatened to bring criminal libel charges against anyone who  spread what they considered "false criticisms" of their Dear Leader.

It is no small exaggeration to conclude that Team Obama's dead  aim is to chill conservative speech and criminalize conservative dissent. All  Americans for prosperity must push back with one voice: No, you  can't.

Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax  Cheats, Crooks & Cronies" (Regnery 2010).

 

Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Newt Gingrich DEMOLISHES Barack Obama in debate.

Newt Gingrich DEMOLISHES Barack  Obama  in debate.

by Peter Shepherd

 

march 2, 20112

"As an American I am  not so shocked that Obama was given the Nobel Peace Prize  without any accomplishments to his name,   America  gave him the White House based on the  same credentials." Newt Gingrich    (7/16/2008)

 

 

Some  people  have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand  them. This  quote came from a friend in the  Czech Republic . We have  a lot of work to   do. "The  danger to America is not Barack Obama but a  citizenry capable of  entrusting a man like him with the Presidency.  It  will be far easier  to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to  restore the  necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate  willing  to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and  far  more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America .

Blaming the prince of  the fools should not  blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that  made him their prince. The  Republic can survive a Barack Obama,who is,  after all, merely a fool.  It  is less likely to survive a multitude  of fools such as those who made him their   president."

 

 

Please open and  enjoy:

 

http://vimeo.com/37836183

 

 

Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: No me gusta Obama, pero no veo como pueda perder

The Coming Persecution of Christians in U.S.

(a priest's projection on what is to come if Obama re-elected)

Standing on my head ^ | March 2, 2012 | Fr. Dwight Longenecker

 

So much talk amongst right wing Catholics of the erosion of religious liberty, the collapse of all things and the coming persecution. Talk of government detention centers and priests being shot like Bl. Miguel Pro.
I don't think they get it. That's not what it will be like.
America is different. We're into image big time. We thought the Soviets were into brainwashing and propaganda. We put them in the shade. America is all about healthy, lusty, good looking guys and gals who are clean cut, successful and smiling. We're into the good life. We're into being good and looking good, and if not the former at least the latter. We're into being the best, most successful and happy people in the world. Don't you know that??
There will be no martial law or military in the streets. That would appear to be so un-American! The officers who enforce the mandate will be lawyers in suits bearing legal documents. The battles will be in the courtroom. The penalties will seem just to the majority of people because we are in a democracy and those who disobey the law need to be punished, for it is the law of the land, and after all, if they had not done anything wrong they would not need to worry about anything!
To disobey the Mandate will seem so obstinate and unreasonable, for the State will not seek to close down any churches. Instead it will support the churches. Clergy training will be paid by the state. The church buildings will be maintained by a church tax which will be called the "tithe". Clergy will remain in their posts. Their dignity will be respected. All they will need to do is sign certain documents which ensure their safety and their freedom of worship in return for acknowledging the authority of the State (in civil matters only of course) These documents will be worded in such a way that a conscience clause will be admitted. The State will control the church "insofar as the law of God allows."
The State will bring in a sensible recognition of the validity of orders between the Christian churches. For practical reasons the Episcopalian priest or the Lutheran minister will be able to exchange ministries with the Catholic priest just as the Episcopalians and Lutherans already do. It will be a practical matter. Nothing theological will be implied for the Ministers of State would never presume to infringe on the theological aspect of the church. That would be above their pay grade. The orders will be interchangeable because the two churches are already so similar, and furthermore, many Episcopal priests are former Catholics and so have valid orders. This will smooth over the inconsistencies.
Many Catholic priests, after all, agree with the Episcopal doctrines and are in favor of married priests, women's ordination and homosexual marriage. Furthermore, the majority of the Catholics in the pews have no real problem with these things, and they see the sense of the government's re-organization of the religious life of the country. They never did like the noisy 'neo con' Catholics with their constant harping on about abortion and being homophobic and obsessed with **noallow**. The government's solutions, it will be agreed, will bring peace to the whole situation. Common sense will prevail.
Oh there will be the complainers to be sure. They call them the 'recusants'. Cranky old homophobic, misogynistic priests--probably most of them secret pedophiles. The ones who are left are living off the grid. Most of the others are locked away for their own safety in the clergy 'retirement homes' that the government took over.
There will be pockets of resistance: Families here and there who are home schooling types--their girls in long denim skirts and their boys with combed hair and white shirts and ties. These "fundamentalists" will be called recusants. Some of the recusant families refuse to pay the "tithe" to maintain the churches and they are being fined and punished for their stupidity. These recusants harbor the priests and hide them away and think they are being martyrs for some great cause. The recusants will find it strangely difficult to get or keep a job. They'll end up impoverished and outside the mainstream.
In the meantime, most Americans will continue on happily. There have been no great revolutions. The economy did not collapse.  There was no great world war. The Muslims did not attack America. Families still go to the Mall, eat out at their favorite restaurants, and enjoy all the great amusements and opportunities America has always had on offer.
They're still neat and snug in the suburbs, and the Catholics? They will remember the first signs of a fuss--over the HHS Mandate of 2012--but it was soon shown that the vast majority of Americans--Catholics included--were in favor of artificial contraception--and didn't really mind abortion that much. Furthermore, it was shown that a good number of Catholic schools and universities and places of employment had already--even before the mandate--been providing cover for contraception, sterilization and abortion. The Bishops were shown to be wrong. The battle had already been lost long ago when the vast majority of Catholics accepted artificial contraception.
In the end, there was not really much of a battle. When things began to reach a crisis point most Catholics quietly stepped back from the fray. The Catholic churches and schools that chose  to be sensible and conform have been rewarded. They continue on much as they have done in the past. The Bishops may have removed the word "Catholic" from their name, but they still call themselves "St Patrick's School" or "Sacred Heart Hospital." They seem to operate the same as before. They have Catholic images on the walls and sisters in pantsuits still patrol the halls.
They fit in with the way of the world. Are some of the laws difficult for them? Perhaps in theory, but they obey. After all, it is the law of the land, and they will have seen how the few schools and colleges that stood up for the faith were crushed. So the Catholic Church will seem not to have been affected that much. The change will have been gradual and slow, and most Catholics will find that it is business as usual.
To be sure, there is a certain lack of edge--a certain softness, but they were like that before the changes happened. Dulled by a happy consumerism, and satiated with the American Dream, these Catholic schools and parishes and universities haven't minded too much that the Pope has been quietly marginalized by the State. They were never too keen on him anyway, and now that things have settled down it's all for the best.
Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: No me gusta Obama, pero no veo como pueda perder

Barack Obama is giving away oil rich Alaskan islands to the Russians

coachisright.com ^ | MARCH 5, 2012 | Suzanne Eovaldi, staff writer

 

The Obama Administration is looking to give Russia seven oil rich Alaskan Islands that were discovered and claimed for America by American explorers according to Alaska Republican 2010 Senatorial candidate Joe Miller. “I think the bigger concern here is what natural resources are being lost to Russia,” says one commenter who deplores the secrecy involved with Obama and his SOS Hilary Clinton gifting Putin with United States land.

Miller blew the whistle on this island give away of billions of off shore oil deposits and rich sea beds in an interview with World Net Daily that literately has cyberspace dripping in anger at this present administration.

But when I called the office of GOP AK long time Senator Lisa Murkowski, her aides told me it’s George Bush the father’s fault, and Obama’s people are just cleaning up long standing agreements. I was given this direct email address which came back failed three times: matthew_felling@murkowski.senate.gov when I tried to get them to go on the record.

Miller and blog researchers state that “the purported Agreement for the island give away WAS NOT and IS NOT a ratified treaty according to public record. . .and this Agreement was negotiated COMPLETELY IN SECRET!”

Famed naturalist John Muir was a member of the U.S. landing party of the U.S. Revenue Marine Ship fleet Thomas Corwin along with other American explorers who were awarded Gold Medals by Congress for their valiant discoveries and exploration of the following Islands which already have been given Russian names: Bennett Island, now Ostrov Bennetta; Wrangel Island, now Ostrov Vrangelya; Hennrietta Island, now Ostrov Genriyetty. Remaining land give away gems are Herald and Copper Islands and Sea Lion Rock and Sea Otter Rocks.

“It breaks my heart. I feel so helpless. infuriated me,” ….

Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: No me gusta Obama, pero no veo como pueda perder

WIKILEAKS: EL GRAN FRAUDE ELECTORAL DE OBAMA DEL 2008

Wikileaks reveals Democrat 2008 election crimes

Exclusive: Andrea Shea King links to ballot scandal

 


3/5/2012

Andrea Shea King is a talk-radio host who also writes at The Radio Patriot website and is known as Central Florida’s “First Lady of Space Coast Conservatism.”

The latest activity by Wikileaks dumped some 5 million emails and documents hacked from the database of Stratfor Intelligence. The emails reveal Democrats’ effort to steal the 2008 election.

Shocking revelations from a Wikileaks document dump show the Democrat Party committed a felony when it stuffed ballot boxes in Ohio and Philadelphia during the 2008 presidential election.

A memo further revealed that the so-called “Reverend” Jesse Jackson was paid a handsome figure to keep his mouth shut about candidate Obama, a man for whom he had little regard.

The same internal memo revealed that Obama’s campaign was taking Russian money surreptitiously.

The memo:

From: Fred Burton [mailto:burton@stratfor.com]

Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 7:41 AM
To: **noallow**@stratfor.com
Subject: Insight – The Dems & Dirty Tricks ** Internal Use Only – Pls Do
Not Forward **
** Internal Use Only – Pls Do Not Forward **

1) The black Dems were caught stuffing the ballot boxes in Philly and Ohio as reported the night of the election and Sen. McCain chose not to fight. The matter is not dead inside the party. It now becomes a matter of sequence now as to how and when to “out”.

2) It appears the Dems “made a donation” to Rev. Jesse (no, they would never do that!) to keep his yap shut after his diatribe about the Jews and Israel. A little bird told me it was a “nice six-figure donation”. This also becomes a matter of how and when to out.

3) The hunt is on for the sleezy Russian money into O-mans coffers. A smoking gun has already been found. Will get more on this when the time is right. My source was too giddy to continue. Can you say Clinton and ChiCom funny money? This also becomes a matter of how and when to out.

Wikileaks last week began disclosing the emails obtained by WikiLeaks and hacktivist group Anonymous that expose the dirty dealings and election tampering done by Democratic Party operatives and the Obama campaign.

Stratfor, under the leadership of founder and Chief Executive George Friedman, counts Fortune 500 corporations and federal government agencies and the military among its subscribers. In a statement, Stratfor said it had built “good sources” in many countries, “as any publisher of global geopolitical analysis would do.”

In a published report, a second Wikileaks email indicated that 2008 Republican presidential candidate John McCain decided not to pursue legal action against the Democrats for engaging in voter fraud, believing that to do so would have thrown the country into civil unrest, and thus let the matter drop.

Emails between Stratfor staffers indicate that McCain’s actions were viewed as baffling, to say the least.

In other related news, the man believed to have provided much information to Wikileaks, Bradley Manning, was suggested to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

 

NIXON, POR LAS MISMAS RAZONES QUE McCAIN (PATRIOTISMO), TAMPOCO QUIZO .DENUNCIAR EL ROBO DE LAS ELECCIONES CUANDO EN CHICAGO Y OTRAS PARTES DE U.S. LOS KENNEDY RECURRIERON A UN FRAUDE ELECTORAL MASIVO

Retirado
siboneyes
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: No me gusta Obama, pero no veo como pueda perder

Investors flee Carbonite after Limbaugh announcement

On Saturday, Carbonite CEO David Friend released a statement on his company’s website declaring that  Carbonite had decided to “withdraw” advertising from Rush Limbaugh’s radio show  in the wake of his controversial  remarks involving Georgetown Law student Sandra Fluke because it will “ultimately contribute to a more civilized public discourse”:

Even though Mr. Limbaugh has now issued an apology, we have nonetheless  decided to withdraw our advertising from his show. We hope that our action,  along with the other advertisers who have already withdrawn their  ads, will ultimately contribute to a more civilized public  discourse.

However, it hasn’t done much to contribute to his company’s stock price.  Since the market opened on Monday through its close today, Carbonite stock  (NASDAQ:CARB) has plummeted nearly 12 percent, outpacing the drop of  the NASDAQ index in that same time period by nine-and-a-half  points. It was also one of the biggest decliners on the NASDAQ on Tuesday.