OBAMA IN PANIC.- DOCUMENTAL OBAMA'S 2016 DRAWING BIG CROWDS
Hollywood Reporter ^ | August 21, 2012 | Pamela McClintock
An anti-Obama documentary based on conservative author Dinesh D’Souza’s book The Roots of Obama’s Rage will expand nationwide this weekend after doing notable business in select markets across the country -- including in liberally minded New York City.
Overall, 2016: Obama's America grossed an impressive $1.2 million last weekend as it upped its theater count from 61 to 169 for a total gross of $2 million, the second-best showing of the year for a documentary after Bully ($3.2 million). That doesn't include nature documentaries Chimpanzee ($29 million) and To the Arctic ($7.6 million).
It's already the No. 12 political documentary of all time -- a market that Michael Moore has cornered -- as well as the No. 2 conservative documentary after Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed ($7.7 million).
Publicado: 08-22-2012 11:29 AM
LA PORKERIA ESA QUE DE LA QUE HABLAS ES DEL MISMISIMO DINESH O SOUZA, UNO DE LOS QUE MAS ODIAN A MUERTE A OBAMA, ASI QUE, QUE ESPERAS QUE PUSIERA EN EL DOCUMENTAL? TODOS LOS INVENTOS Y HORRORES QUE SE LE OCURRIERON O INVENTARON CONTRA EL PRESIDENTE. JAJA, NI MAS NI MENOS QUE EL SOUZA, TREMENDO FARSANTE QUE QUIERE VER A OBAMA EN EL MISMISIMO INFIERNO, JAJAJAJAJA, BURROOOO!!!!!
PRUEBAQUE SOMOS NANGARAS, VIEJO ARPIA, A VER SI PUEDES, SINVERGUENZA MALA LECHE QUE ERES,!
08-22-2012 02:44 PM - editado 08-22-2012 02:46 PM
Obama will officially **noallow** his 2012 re-election campain, and no I’m not kidding, on Karl Marx’s birthday, May 5th! First, we learn that Earth Day was started on the birthday of Vladimir Lenin, the Communist butcher and founder of the US..., now we learn that Barack Obama, America’s first Marxist president, is launching his campaign on the father of communism’s birthday? Come on, now. This is just too appropriate! How fitting!
Publicado: 08-22-2012 06:09 PM
by David Freddoso
The liberal media sold the American people on Barack Obama as a philosopher king, or philosopher president: intellectual, endowed with extraordinary talents, and even, in the words of Newsweek's Evan Thomas, "sort of God." But as weary Americans know after two years of Obama's presidency, the real Obama is far from the mythical figure that the president's media fan club still idolizes. Obama didn't come to Washington from Mount Olympus. He came from the corrupt and dirty politics of Chicago. In Gangster Government: Barack Obama and the New Washington Thugocracy, David Freddoso, bestselling author of The Case Against Barack Obama, exposes the real truth of Obama's background in Chicago's bare-knuckle politics and White House that approaches Chicago levels of skullduggery and corruption.
Bribery, coercion, intimidation. Freddoso's book reads like the account of a mafia gangland trial -- but unfortunately, we're talking about your federal government. Freddoso exposes how the Obama administration bears a closer resemblance to the mob than to a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Laying bare the backdoor deals, threats, and pay-to-play schemes Obama uses to push his policies on unsuspecting voters, Gangster Governmentproves that Obama is more concerned with protecting his friends and punishing his enemies than doing right by the American public.
Obama, Freddoso reminds us, won his first election for state Senate by throwing all of his opponents off the ballot. He was a famously arrogant and prickly state senator who nearly got into a fistfight with one of his state Senate colleagues in 1997, declaring to him on the Senate floor, "I'm going to kick your *****!" Freddoso also points out that the Obama of media myth likewise bears no resemblance to the president of the United States who refers to his political opponents as "teabaggers" (which, as liberals snickeringly know, refers to an obscene sexual practice), and tells his political adversaries that they can ride in the car, but they'll have to sit in back.
What Gangster Governmentreveals is truly shocking, even to those who think they know all about Obama's questionable background and shady associations. Freddoso exposes Obama's corrupt union ties, his attempts to transfer the property of groups that are out of favor to politically favored groups, the pork and boondoggle of his economic policies (including how he has thrown good money after bad companies that were hemorrhaging cash and in no **noallow** to create jobs), and more about the sleaze and corruption of the Obama White House - including who really benefited from the auto industry bailout and the stimulus package (it wasn't the car companies or the American people). He explains how Obama and his EPA cronies are setting up a protection racket to control fossil fuels; why trial lawyers will benefit from Obamacare more than anyone else; and much, much more.
- The FCC's power grab: how it serves as a reminder that even without a friendly Congress, Obama still can and will enact more of his agenda, with varying degrees of destruction to Americans' freedom and property
- The flagrant hypocrisy of Obama's oft-repeated statement that he opposes tax cuts for millionaires
- The immense cost of Obama's vision: how it has undermined rather than boosted recovery, while providing billions in subsidies to the Administration's cronies
- How the Obama Administration is setting aside basic property rights in order to reward the United Auto Workers for the support the union has given the Democratic Party
- The stimulus: how Obama Administration officials have tried to manufacture evidence that it was successful
- How the White House, after its bailout of General Motors, colluded with the automaker to project the misleading impression that GM had paid back the government's money
- Ford Motor Co.: how it didn't receive a direct bailout, but successfully avoided the double stigma of bankruptcy and government control -- and still got to enjoy substantial benefits from the Obama administration's largesse
- Helping out his union friends: Obama's Executive Order authorizing federal agencies to require all contractors on construction projects larger than $25 million to sign "project labor agreements" that force contractors to use union labor
- What Obama will do for middle class Americans: how his actions in the first two years of his administration show that he will ignore their needs and accommodate unions in their name
- Obama's war against Arizona -- and how Arizona's new immigration law is the product of years of frustration with a federal government unwilling to do anything about border control
- Obama's healthcare "reform": how the work of establishing the 159 new bureaucracies and panels contained in the health care reform law has already begun -- and some of them will soon be making one-size-fits all decisions about medical treatments, coverage requirements, and industry practices.
- How Congress has been both the victim and the facilitator of massive expansions of executive power under Obama
- Surprise! You're a member of a union! How you could find yourself in this situation -- thanks to Barack Obama
- How Obama is working systematically to marginalize the most powerful forces behind the Republican Party, setting loose top White House officials to undermine conservatives in the media, business and lobbying worlds
- Why no future administration should be given as much power over health care as the last Congress has given the Obama administration
Controversial and compelling, Gangster Government reveals an administration that is so corrupt, it would make Al Capone blush. But while the election of a new president in 2012 can arrest some of the damage Obama has inflicted, but it will not solve the long-term problem of gangster government. Best of all, Freddoso lays out a solid plan to reverse the corruption and clean up our government once and for all.
Publicado: 08-22-2012 08:48 PM
By: Gary Jason
When it comes to presidential liars, Obama makes Clinton like novices.
Gary Jason is a contributing editor of Liberty.
There is so much angst in the country that even the exceptionally obtuse Obama has become aware of it. To use a term rendered infamous by the feckless Jimmy Carter, we are experiencing a national malaise. But what Obama fails to comprehend is that at the root of the current national malaise is Obama himself.
In this, as in many other ways, Obama uncannily resembles Carter, who projected his own defects of thought and action onto the nation, generating the anxiety and distrust he was purporting to heal. We can rightly call the national mood “Obamalaise,” because it arises not just from Obama’s agenda but from his character.
A major factor in Obamalaise is, of course, the lingering economic recession. The unemployment rate seems stuck at 10%. But it’s really worse than that. The December 2009 Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) report put nonfarm job losses at 85,000 in November but showed that unemployment stayed at 10% — because so many people (over 660,000) had given up looking for work. The BLS household survey — a more accurate indicator of the unemployment picture, because it measures underemployed along with unemployed — put the November loss at nearly 590,000 jobs.
More recent data are not encouraging. The January 2010 report put the nonfarm job losses at only 20,000, but it showed that the December report underreported the number of unemployed. The unemployment rate dropped to 9.7%, but again this was because of the large number of people who were no longer searching for work. The Bureau of Labor Statistics job report for Feb. 5 showed that roughly 15 million Americans remained out of work.
Even if the economy continues to expand, job growth will probably continue to lag, for reasons I explore below. And we can’t be sure it will continue to expand. Nouriel Roubini — to cite only one economist who holds this view — predicts that the economy will grow at only 3% in the first half of the year, then drop to 1% or 1.5% in the second half, with unemployment possibly hitting 11%.
Which of Obama’s actions have led to this malaise? Quite a few, but let me just review six major fields in which the president’s work has been counterproductive, to say the least.
First, he has focused almost exclusively on forcing some kind of massive new healthcare entitlement on the country. This has had three perverse effects, all of which have deterred hiring. As Kathryn Nix emphasized in a report for the Heritage Institute (Jan. 12), no matter which version of the bill would have been passed, it would have imposed massive new labor expenses on small businesses, which create the bulk of new jobs.
Moreover, as the different versions of healthcare were negotiated, the uncertainty as to what new regulatory burdens the insurance, pharmaceutical, and medical industries would be saddled with made them unwilling to undertake expansion. Finally, in crusading into an area where nobody really saw a crisis, Obama overlooked the economic crisis that everybody recognizes as real. Scott Brown’s election has, perhaps, slain Obamacare, but Obama has made it clear he will keep on the issue.
Second, there is Obama’s reflexive tendency to bash business, obviously an outward manifestation of an inner — what? lack of enthusiasm for? or is it loathing of? — free enterprise. He has vociferously attacked doctors, insurance companies, banks — everyone but lawyers. As Amity Shlaes has noted, in this Obama resembles one of his heroes, FDR, whose demonizing of business was a major factor in prolonging the Great Depression. “Roosevelt’s tender mercies toward businesses,” she says, “so terrified companies that they postponed both hiring and investment.”
In February Obama’s Two-Minutes Hate against banks dropped the Dow by 5% in three days. Is it any wonder that in a recent poll of investors and analysts who are Bloomberg subscribers 77% said that Obama is antibusiness?
Third, Obama’s conspicuous stiffing of secured lenders has — naturally — discouraged lending. His thoroughly immoral bankruptcy deal with GM and Chrysler cheated the secured creditors in favor of the United Auto Workers Union. Who is eager to lend money to businesses, now that the secured lender’s claim on assets (set by a century of bankruptcy law) can be negated by one call from a union boss to the White House?
Meanwhile, Obama’s mortgage modification program (aptly nicknamed the “mortgage cram down plan”) forces mortgage holders to renegotiate legal contracts to the holder’s detriment — another discouragement to lending. There has to be a kind of blindness in an administration that would lead it to institute a program that screws lenders for past loans, then bashes them for not issuing enough new ones.
Fourth, Obama has pushed an extreme environmentalist agenda that is a major drag on employment. According to the estimate from last year by the Charles River Associates, his cap-and-trade bill, which passed the House and awaits approval in the Senate, will cost 3.2 million jobs over 15 years, should it be enacted. And a study this year from the Heritage Foundation estimates the cost of cap-and-trade, if enacted, at $9.9 trillion by 2035.
Then there is the whole wacky “green jobs” plan to replace jobs in fossil fuel industries with jobs in the wind and solar power industries. As George Will warned last year (Washington Post, June 25), the Spanish experience demonstrates that such a plan creates far fewer jobs than it costs. The reason is bloody obvious to all but the economically clueless: replacing one source of power with another source, which happens to cost hundreds of times more to produce, destroys jobs elsewhere.
But this hasn’t stopped Obama’s Interior Secretary Ken Salazar from directing his agency to ratchet up regulations on oil and natural gas companies seeking to drill on federal lands. Obama clearly intends to break his campaign promise to expand domestic drilling.
Fifth, Obama is the most protectionist president since Hoover. He has refused to enact the free trade agreements (FTAs) that were on his desk the day he walked into the Oval Office (including agreements with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea), much less negotiate any new ones. Meanwhile, our trading competitors are increasing the pace of signing new FTAs, especially in Asia.
Worse, Obama’s actions have caused mini-trade wars with our partners. There is the breaking of our NAFTA agreement that allows a small number of Mexican trucks to operate in the United States, an event that has led Mexico to impose tariffs on our goods. The “Buy American” provisions in Obama’s stimulus bill have led to retaliation by Canada. And his tariffs on tires and other products have led the Chinese to slap major tariffs of their own on our products, and to file suit against us at the WTO, and most recently dump $35 billion of our bonds in one month.
Publicado: 08-23-2012 04:51 PM
Sixth, Obama’s spending is grotesque and destructive. Over 2.7 million jobs have been lost since the passage of his deceptively named stimulus bill (priced at $787 billion). He will add more to the deficit in the first 20 months of his presidency than his predecessor did in eight years — and George W. Bush was certainly no slouch in the deficit department. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the deficit for 2010 will hit $1.6 trillion, higher than the record $1.5 trillion deficit of 2009. And it estimates a deficit of nearly $1 trillion in 2011.
The metastasizing deficit causes profound unease, because people know what it entails: massive new taxes, or massive inflation, or both. Already the end of the Bush tax cuts draws nigh: next year, the top income tax rate will go from 35% back up to 39.6%, the capital gains tax from 15% back up to 20%, and the dividend tax from 15% back way up to 39.6%. The estate tax will rise from zero this year back to 55%. With trillion-dollar deficits as far as the eye can see, the Obama administration will gladly let tax cuts expire.
Indeed, Obama has stoked fears of massive new taxes with his recent pronouncement that he is open to raising taxes on households earning less than $250,000 a year, despite his repeated promises during the campaign that he wouldn’t raise taxes on such families “by one dime.”
To summarize: Obama’s policies in office look like a bizarre mishmash of the worst policies of Hoover and FDR at the onset of the Great Depression. Take Hoover’s foolish idea to raise taxes in a severe recession and his acceptance of Smoot-Hawley protectionism, add FDR’s endless jeremiads against big business, his soak-the-rich taxes, and his Keynesian spending schemes, and — behold! — you have Obamaism.
But Obamalaise is not the product simply of Obama’s anti-business, pro-big-government policies. It is tied to his character, a character with deceitfulness at its core. He has lied on more matters more often than any other president I can recall. People have fun writing columns enumerating his lies. I wrote one last year listing six howlers (Orange County Register, Oct. 9). A recent article by John Ellis (FrontPageMagazine.com, Jan. 21) lists 30 major lies, and he admits that it is not exhaustive. Here is just a partial list of Obama’s major deceptions (equivocations, lies, broken promises, and flip-flopped policies). Consider their size and number.
- After bashing Bush for a $498 billion deficit, Obama ran a $1.5 trillion deficit, to be followed by a $1.6 trillion deficit, and then trillion-dollar deficits going forward.
- Obama campaigned promising to protect Medicare from cuts, but then proposed half a trillion bucks worth of them in his healthcare “reform.”
- Obama pretended that he understood why whites resented never-ending racial quotas aimed at them, but appointed the most unapologetic quota queen he could to the Supreme Court.
- Obama bashed Bush for not spending enough for manned space exploration, but he cut it altogether in his new budget.
- Obama promised that his stimulus bill would stop unemployment from going above 8%, and that most of the jobs created would be in the private sector, but the rate went above 10% and most of the jobs created are in government.
- Obama pretended to agree with McCain about the evils of pork-barrel spending, and promised to veto every pork-barrel bill, before signing a bill containing 9,000 pork-barrel projects.
- Obama repeatedly promised that all negotiations on healthcare would be completely transparent, indeed, would be broadcast on C-SPAN, but had nothing but closed door hearings with only Democrats present in the crafting of the legislation.
- On other areas as well, Obama promised greater transparency, but rammed through controversial bills with little discussion.
- During his campaign, Obama asserted that he opposed a single-payer system, but he had in fact repeatedly called for it in prior years; then he pushed for a public option that would crowd out private carriers, resulting in a de facto single-payer system.
- Obama promised not to hire lobbyists, but wound up employing massive numbers of them.
- Obama promised to abide by the campaign finance reform law funding limits that he himself had supported, but broke his pledge (and outspent McCain, $600 million to $300 million).
- Obama constantly said that if people liked their healthcare provider, they could keep it, but his bill would have limited that privilege to people currently insured, ending it if they changed providers; it also had built-in incentives that would have led employers to drop private coverage and use the public option.
- Obama promised to stop the practice of introducing bills so long that people couldn’t read or discuss them, but he has introduced bills of record length (witness the health bill at 2,000 pages).
- Obama promised a new era of bipartisanship, but he froze the Republicans in Congress out of negotiations on important bills and bashed his Republican predecessor every chance he could find.
- After bashing McCain, both in debates and in tens of millions of dollars worth of ads, for his willingness to tax health-care benefits provided by employers, Obama proposed a health bill constructed on the basis of that tax proposal.
- Obama promised to close Gitmo. It remains open.
- After promising in his campaign against McCain that he would open up domestic drilling, he did the reverse, bringing new regulations to block exploration on public lands.
- After heatedly denying that his healthcare proposals would fund premiums for illegal aliens, he persistently blocked attempts to spell that out clearly in the bill he pushed.
- After promising when pitching his healthcare bill that it wouldn’t raise premiums, he insisted that the bill require insurance carriers to cover people with preexisting conditions, which could do nothing but raise premiums.
This pattern of lies did not result from accident or coincidence.
Ellis rightly notes that most other politicians known for their lies have been trying to protect themselves from scandal (Clinton’s adultery, Nixon’s abuse of power), or just “to make themselves look good”; but Obama lies about everything. He employs deceit as a standard tool. This bespeaks a man false to his core — a man lost in a state of metaphysical mendacity in which one can say anything one likes to manipulate others.
Given the prevalence of news media that, as Ellis observes, are unwilling to hold this president to account for his array of untruths — as they held Nixon to account for his lies, Bush the elder to account for breaking his tax pledge, and Bush the younger to account for the nonexistent weapons of mass destruction — it is no surprise that Obama has lied so blatantly. But this has not escaped the notice of the public, and it frightens them, for it tells them they have no idea what he really wants or intends.
In short, there is a growing awareness among Americans that their president is economically ignorant, politically radical, deeply duplicitous, and totally untrustworthy. This is the cause of Obamalaise.
Publicado: 08-23-2012 04:51 PM
DA EL TIRO DE GRACIA BILL CLINTON A LA REELECION DE OBAMA
ENSALZA BILL CLINTON EL "STERLING" RECORD EMPRESARIAL DE ROMNEY
Video: Romney's Qualifications, Business Experience Lauded by...Bill Clinton
By Guy Benson 6/1/2012
Just when you thought yesterday couldn't have gotten any worse for the Obama campaign, a certain former president appeared on CNN and asserted that Mitt Romney is qualified to be president, thanks to his leadership as governor and "sterling" career in the private sector:
This could deliver something of a coup de grace to the Obama campaign's all-Bain-all-the-time attack strategy. President Obama stated that this campaign will "be about" Romney's "vampire capitalism." Bill Clinton, Deval Patrick, and at least a dozen other Democrats have dissented from that view. Publicly. And we're still awaiting an explanation for why a handful of companies failing after Romney left Bain = greedy and evil, whereas Solyndra and other taxpayer-financed benefactors of cronyism shutting down = honest mistakes. Enlighten us, liberals. Oh, and by the way, Romney has jumped ahead in Ohio, Virginia, Florida and North Carolina.
Publicado: 08-23-2012 05:50 PM
Barone: GM goes from bad to worse despite Obama bailout
Washington Examiner ^ | 08-21-2012 | Michael Barone
Obama told a campaign event audience in Colorado earlier this month, "I said, let's bet on America's workers. And we got management and workers to come together, making cars better than ever, and now GM is number one again and the American auto industry has come roaring back."
His conclusion: "So now I want to say that what we did with the auto industry, we can do in manufacturing across America. Let's make sure advanced, high-tech manufacturing jobs take root here, not in China. Let's have them here in Colorado. And that means supporting investment here."
Was he calling for a federal bailout of other American manufacturing companies? And what does he mean by "supporting investment"? White House reporters have not asked these obvious questions, for the good reason that the president, who has been attending fundraisers on an average of one every 60 hours, had not held a press conference in something like two months until recently. They were not asked in his brief, impromptu press conference on Monday.
Obama talks about the auto bailout frequently, since it's one of the few things in his record that gets positive responses in the polls. But he's probably wise to avoid probing questions, since the GM bailout is not at all the success he claims.
GM has been selling cars in the U.S. at deep discount and, while it's making money in China -- and is outsourcing operations there and elsewhere -- it's bleeding losses in Europe. It's spending billions to ditch its Opel brand there in favor of Chevrolet, including $559 million to put the Chevy logo on Manchester United soccer team uniforms -- and just fired the marketing exec who cut that deal.
It botched the **noallow** of its new Chevrolet Malibu by starting with the green-friendly Eco version, which pleased its government shareholders but which got lousy reviews. And it's selling only about 10,000 electric-powered Chevy Volts a year, a puny contribution toward Obama's goal of 1 million electric vehicles on the road by 2015.
"GM is going from bad to worse," reads the headline on Automotive News Editor-in-Chief Keith Crain's analysis. That's certainly true of its stock price.
The government still owns 500 million shares of GM, 26 percent of the total. It needs to sell them for $53 a share to recover its $49.5 billion bailout. But the stock price is about $20 a share, and the Treasury now estimates that the government will lose more than $25 billion if and when it sells.
That's in addition to the revenue lost when the Obama administration permitted GM to continue to deduct previous losses from current profits, even though such deductions are ordinarily wiped out in bankruptcy proceedings.
It's hard to avoid the conclusion that GM is bleeding money because of decisions made by a management eager to please its political masters -- and by the terms of the bankruptcy arranged by Obama car czars Ron Bloom and Steven Rattner.
Rattner himself admitted late last year, in a speech to the Detroit Economic Club, that "We should have asked the [United Auto Workers] to do a bit more. We did not ask any UAW member to take a cut in their pay." Nonunion employees of GM spin-off Delphi lost their pensions. UAW members didn't.
The UAW got its political payoff. And GM, according to Forbes writer Louis Woodhill, is headed to bankruptcy again.
Is this really what Obama wants to do for all manufacturing across America? Let's hope not.
Publicado: 08-23-2012 08:34 PM