¡Bienvenido a los Foros de Univision! Participa, intercambia mensajes privados, sube tus fotos y forma parte de nuestra Comunidad. | Ingresa | Regístrate Gratis
Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: "If I wanted America to fail"

part 2

Let me read that to you, again. This is profound. "[M]ore than four-fifths of the reduction in unemployment has been accomplished by a dropping adult labor force participation rate." It's exactly what I said. Obama is lowering the rate by destroying the job market, and even this economist at the University of Maryland has figured it out. It's "essentially persuading adults they don't need a job, or the job they could find is not worth having." There has been, by the way, a near viral response to this slideshow I told you about yesterday about "Julia."

She's the cradle-to-crave, typical Obama voter, a woman from age three to age 67. Everybody has taken their turn at turning that around and making it funny and so forth. But the fact of the matter is, that's the dream citizen as far as the Obama administration is concerned. That's the dream citizen: Constant care, cradle-to-grave, taken care of, everything in life provided by the government. Everything, except a husband. This woman had a child but there was no mention of a man in her life at any point.

Not even buried in the garden!

There was no mention of a husband, no mention of a boyfriend, no mention of a sperm bank. No mention of a gay fashion designer. I mean, no mention of a man anywhere in that slideshow. So this economist has it right: "essentially persuading adults they don't need a job." That is what Obama has done! Oh, he's out there talking it up real good, and he talks about what theoretically happens in the private sector. You go to the school, you work, you get paid, and you start a business. You take some risks.

He doesn't believe any of that.

What he's actually done is promised to pay the freight for people who don't want to work anymore.

The only way 88 million Americans can be out of the job market is either for there to be a depression or for the government (or somebody) to be taking care of them so that they don't have to work.

And that's exactly what is happening.

And I maintain to you it's by design and on purpose.


RUSH: I do have a little bit more data here on the unemployment information, and I want to stick with it because it's a passion of mine that you know the truth, particularly when everybody's being bombarded with the lies that the administration wants to settle in. Here is what Obama will not be telling college kids as he runs around and warns them of the pitfalls awaiting them if Mitt Romney's elected.

The unemployment rate among jobseekers between the ages of 16 and 19 was 25% in April, up from 23% in February. Youth unemployment has been above 23% for 34 months. The Obama administration promised us that with the passage of the stimulus bill in 2009, the unemployment rate would never reach 8%. It has been above 8% for a period of time so long that it can accurately and truthfully be said that the unemployment rate has not been this high for this long since the Great Depression.

And that's a fact.

Not one promise, not one theory, not one assurance has come close to being true as told us by this administration. The unemployment rate has not been this high for this long since the Great Depression. This is life in Obama's America. It's reality. This is not a cartoon; this is not a slideshow; this is not a socialist utopian slideshow with a woman named Julia. And they shoulda named her Ludmilla or Svetlana or Maureena, not Julia. This is why Obama creates fictional stories about fictional people.

Reality is the enemy to the Obama administration.

So Obama's job is to paint a nonexistent picture of Never Land in the years ahead, and that's what that slideshow is. By now Obama should be able to proudly report on robust, mind-boggling growth as Reagan did this far into his first term. But it's going the other way. The only way Barack Obama can get the unemployment rate down is to kill jobs. That's the only way, and that's how he's doing it. There aren't any being created, folks. That 113,000 or 115,000 is a rounding error. With O... (interruption)

Well, that's the good question. I don't know. You have 88 million Americans not in the job force, but they're eating. Eighty-eight million Americans not in the job force are using their cell phone phones. Eighty-eight million people not working are driving their cars. There is no pain to not having a job. That's not true for every one of them, but it's true for a number of 'em, and we don't know how many. There are some people for whom unemployment (or if you run out of that, turn on your Social Security disability payments) pays more than some of the jobs that are being created in this administration.

Unemployment compensation plus food stamps adds up to more than two-thirds of the jobs and the kind of jobs being created. See, during the Great Depression, when whatever the numbers were who were unemployed, they weren't comfortable. There was a sense of urgency. They would dig ditches if they had to. They will pick cotton if they had to. But now, it isn't necessary. And, by the way, we don't have the money to support people not working!

We are $16 trillion in debt.

We don't have the money.

We are borrowing it from the ChiComs, enabling them to ramp up their military complex. This is a horrible, horrible situation. You want some more numbers? I have numbers. Just like Bill Burkett had numbers tying George Bush to the National Guard, I have numbers. Since President Obama took office, the unemployment rate has increased from 7.8% to 8.1%. And as we know, it's been in the nines. There are currently a million unemployed workers that have given up looking for work since the last report.

Do you realize what that means?

Given up looking for work!

Therefore they're not in the labor force. Therefore they're not counted. There are currently 7.8 million workers working part-time for economic reasons. Only 115,000 jobs were added. The labor force participation rate is 63.6%, a 30-year low. We are at a 30-year low in the number of Americans working. With 8.1% unemployment, Obama has extended his record of 8%-plus unemployment now to 39 consecutive months. It has not been this high, this long, since the Great Depression.

If the labor force participation rate had stayed the same as in March, the unemployment rate would have risen to 8.4%. In other words, if they hadn't just said that a million people left the job market, the unemployment rate would be 8.4%. It woulda gone up. This is precisely why I'm saying to you that to get the rate down, Obama is killing jobs. Our buddy Jim Pethokoukis points out: "If the size of the US labor force as a share of the total population was the same as it was when Barack Obama took office ... the U-3 unemployment rate would be 11.0%," not 8.1%.

And if the unemployment rate were 11% today, what do you think the prospects of Obama's reelection would be? They would be over. I repeat this again: The unemployment rate would be 11% today if the labor force was the same size as when Obama took office. Now, you're asking, "Well, how can they just eliminate the jobs?" Well, for one thing, they have eliminated 'em. (chuckles) Have you gone and tried to find one lately? Number two, they run the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Department of Labor. If they want to say a million people left the job market last month, they can say it.

And they're probably right! They're probably right.

Because if 88 million people are not working but they're still eating and driving and using their cell phones and able to watch the E! Entertainment Network after Entertainment Tonight while they're TiVoing Two and a Half Men -- all to watch Obama later that night slow-jam the news with Jimmy Fallon -- what does it matter whether they have a job or not? The unemployment rate, if the US labor force was the same size today as when Obama took office, would be 11%, folks, instead of 8.1%.

In April of 1984, coming out of similar Jimmy Carter-type economics and circumstances, Ronaldus Magnus was approaching the end of his first term. In April of 1984, the US economy added a population-adjusted 480,000 jobs. That was at the beginning of the Reagan boom. That was the beginning of the boom with Reaganomics, which Obama and the Democrats tell us didn't work! They tell us it never worked. It's as simple as this: The number of people in the job market is based on something called the Household Survey at the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

And do you know what they do there?

They call people and ask, "Have you looked for to a job in the last four weeks?" And whatever the answer is gets tabulated. That's how scientific it is. That's where we are. And, finally: "US worker productivity fell from January through March by the most in a year." I thought we had a "moderate recovery" happening here, and I thought we had "turned a corner." I thought we'd been around the bend and back. I thought we were back from up against the wall! So not only are fewer people working; their output fell by the most in a year.

"While worker output rose, the number of hours worked increased by an even larger amount." Therefore the overall output was down. You see how they're monkeying these numbers?

No offense to monkeys.



Mensajes: 137,145
Registrado: ‎12-15-2005

Re: "If I wanted America to fail"

ABC news .. Diane Sawyer...."Bring America Back?"


SHOCKING ABC   News on Obama/USA Infrastructure


Diane Sawyer reporting on U.S. Bridge projects going to the

Chinese.... NOT Americans.


The bridges are right here in the U.S. And yet Chinese contractors are coming in to do the work.

What about jobs for Americans???



This one should be tough for Obama supporters   to swallow....

AND it comes from ABC NEWS...no Snopes or Wikileaks on this one!!



  U.S.A.  Bridges and Roads Being Built by Chinese Firms

Shocking to say the least!


This video is a jaw-dropper that will make you sick.


 (It   was also shocking that ABC was actually reporting this story....

Maybe reality is finally hitting the Main Stream Media ???)


Our tax dollars are at work - for CHINA !!!



CLICK here: U.S. Bridges, Roads Being Built by   Chinese Firms | Video - ABC News






Pass on to Democrats and Republicans








Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: "If I wanted America to fail"







Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Vice President Marco Rubio?

Vice President Marco Rubio?  

Stephen F. Hayes

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

"If I wanted America to fail" I WOULD RE-ELECT OBAMA

The Dohrn   Connection



Bernardine Dohrn has a  history  with the Justice Department. More specifically, in the early  1970s, she was one  of the FBI’s most wanted fugitives because of her  actions with the Weather  Underground, a violent radical  organization.

Times have changed. In 2010 and 2011, the Justice   Department saw fit to give $400,000 in grants to  an  organization that lists Dohrn as a member of its board of directors: a  $150,000  grant in September of 2010 and a $250,000 grant a year later.

The organization that received the grants is the  W.  Haywood Burns Institute, and the project that brought in the money is  the  Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative. JDAI aims to keep juvenile  criminals  out of ssecure confinement” and to reduce racial disparities in  the  juvenile justice system.

As a prominent figure in the Weather Underground — which  was initially known as simply “Weatherman” — Dohrn helped lead the “Days of  Rage” Chicago riot, and during her tenure the group was  responsible for numerous  bombings of government buildings. Although Dohrn  has never renounced her past,  her various legal troubles are behind her:  She served some probation, several  charges were dismissed, and she spent  some time in jail for refusing to  cooperate with an investigation. She’s  now a law professor at Northwestern  University, and her husband, fellow  Weather Underground co-founder William  Ayers, is a retired education  professor at the University of Illinois at  Chicago.

The Burns Institute’s name comes from a man who  himself  exemplified the blend of civil-rights activism, academic prestige,  and radical  politics that defines the group today. W. Haywood Burns worked  with Martin  Luther King Jr. during the civil-rights movement and  eventually became the dean  of the law school at Queens College. He  also was married to Bernardine  Dohrn’s sister, Jennifer, and he“represented the black radical  Angela Davis against charges of  kidnapping and murder, and coordinated the  defense for inmates indicted in  the Attica prison riot,” as the New York  Times noted in his 1996   obituary.

The Institute’s biography of Burns  refers  to the 1971 Attica rioters as “people struggling for  self-determination.” The  rioters protested poor conditions by taking their  guards hostage until police  launched a full assault on the prison. One of  the group’s leaders was Sam  Melville, who had bombed numerous government  and business buildings shortly  before the Weather Underground began doing  the same thing. After the horribly  managed police assault left 39 dead — in addition to an officer who was killed  by the rioters at the outset of  the incident, as well as several inmates who  were killed by other  prisoners during the chaos — the Weather Underground bombed  a New York  Department of Corrections facility in retaliation. Virtually everyone   involved in the Attica riots and their aftermath acted poorly, and yet, as   Patrick Brennan has noted on NRO before,  a  certain group of aging radicals seems to see the incident as some kind  of  triumph.

Meanwhile, JDAI, the project that earned the Burns   Institute its Justice grants, is spearheaded by the Annie E. Casey  Foundation.  In 2010 the federal government agreed to help the Casey  Foundation fund training  and other consulting services while it expands  the program to new sites, and it  was through this agreement that the Burns  Institute secured its grants. During  the grant-application process, the  Justice Department does not typically require  groups to provide lists of  their directors.

The Burns Institute’s primary goal is to reduce  racial  disparities in juvenile justice, a problem it attributes primarily  to  discrimination rather than disproportionate   misbehavior. The Institute aims to get the U.N.  to  take a role in American juvenile justice, and it also works with  local  governments (for a fee) to address the issue. The organization’s  process  involves bringing together various stakeholders — police, parents,  prosecutors,  etc. — to discuss policy changes. The group says that this helps   decrease juvenile confinement without sacrificing public   safety.

If that’s true, it’s good. But there are plenty of   charities that do good work without including Weather Underground   co-founders on their boards of directors and openly praising prison rioters  on  their websites. Presidential administrations have  considerable  discretion when it comes to federal grants. But it is not too  much to ask that  the Justice Department avoid giving money to groups with  ties to violent  radicals.

The Burns Institute did not provide a comment in  time  for publication, Dohrn did not reply to several attempts to contact  her, and the  Office of Justice Programs declined to provide a quote  for  attribution.

— Robert VerBruggen is a   deputy managing editor of National  Review.

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: "If I wanted America to fail" I WOULD RE-ELECT


Losses at Oprah's OWN approach a staggering $330m as industry insiders predict it will be axed within the year

By Rachel Quigley

The losses at Oprah Winfrey’s troubled cable channel are approaching a staggering $330 million, according to a report over the weekend.

Industry insiders believe the channel - the Oprah Winfrey network (OWN) - will not last another year unless they come up with a hit show and make a dramatic turnaround.

Though ratings have seen a slight insurgence thanks to interview program Oprah's Next Chapter, it has stumbled since the get go with ratings of just 308,000 daily.

From left: Christina Norman, CEO of OWN, Oprah Winfrey, Chairman of OWN and David Zaslav, President and CEO of Discovery Communications, toast the moment of **noallow** in January 2011

From left: Christina Norman, CEO of OWN, Oprah Winfrey, Chairman of OWN and David Zaslav, President and CEO of Discovery Communications, toast the moment of **noallow** in January 2011

It is believed shows which do not feature the chat show queen herself are not popular with viewers.

Discovery, which partnered with Winfrey to **noallow** the network and has been underwriting its costs, has invested nearly $600 million in it since 2008, according to an extensive report in Businessweek magazine.

Since it started on the air in January 2011, it may have lost as much as $330million, according to the magazine.

David Zaslav, the chief executive officer of Discovery Communications who talked Oprah into the idea of OWN, is famously impatient with money-losing operations within his company and insiders say he will not put up with the aiing network's losses for much longer.

Winfrey appeared before advertisers two weeks ago to ask for more time, telling them: 'I am in the climb of my life. I am climbing Kilimanjaro.'

Although she doesn't risk losing a lot of money from the channel's failings, Oprah's reputation is at stake.

Over her 39-year career, The Oprah Winfrey Show had as many as 12.5 million viewers. O, The Oprah Magazine had more than two million subscribers. And her Internet site, Oprah.com, draws more than three million unique visitors a month.

Her image as the most successful TV star of her generation is on the line.

E-mails to OWN and Oprah’s production company, Harpo, were not returned yesterday. 

In March i was announced that Rosie O' Donnell's talk show The Rosie Show had been axed by the network after only six months.

It debuted with 500,000 viewers but within days fell to half of that

  • Oprah.com attracted 5.1million unique users in January 2011 when her daytime chat show was still being aired. But by July it was half that number at 2.4million, according to figures from comScore.
  • At the end of last year, O Magazine's circulation was 2.4million, but it has steadily fallen since then and is expected to be around 1.9million by the summer.
  • OWN premiered on January 1, 2011, to an average of 505,000 viewers. One month later ratings plummeted to an average of just 135,000 with only 30 per cent of those viewers in the targeted demographic of women ages 25 to 54.
  • The Rosie Show debuted on OWN with 497,000 viewers.Within a week the ratings plummeted to 200,000 per episode.

It has been the kiss of death for Oprah's tv channel because of her political militancy supporting Obama.  She is another victim of the Obamas' inverted Midas touch.  Two of Michelle's favorite designers also went bankrupt.

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: "If I wanted America to fail" I WOULD RE-ELECT

25 Statistics About The U.S.   Economy  Barack Obama Does Not Want You To Know

April 30, 2012 9:49 Author: The American Dream


The human capacity for self-delusion truly is  remarkable.  Most  people out there end up believing exactly what they  want to believe  even when  the truth is staring them right in the  face. Take the U.S.  economy for example.  Barack Obama wants to  believe that his policies have  worked and that the U.S.  economy is  improving. So that is what he is  telling the American people. The   mainstream media wants to believe that  Barack Obama is a good president  and that  his policies make sense and so  they are reporting that we  are experiencing an  economic recovery. A very  large segment of the  U.S. population still fully  supports Barack Obama and  they want to  believe that the economy is getting  better so they are buying  the  propaganda that the mainstream media is feeding  them. But is the  U.S.  economy really improving? The truth is that it is not. The  rate  of  employment among working age Americans is exactly where it was two  years   ago and household incomes have actually gone down while Obama  has been   president. Home ownership levels and home prices continue  to decline.  Meanwhile,  food and gasoline continue to become even  more expensive. The  percentage of  Americans that are dependent on  the government is at an  all-time record high and  the U.S. national  debt has risen by more than 5  trillion dollars under Obama. We   simply have not seen the type of economic  recovery that we have seen after  every  other economic recession since  World War II.

The horrible statistics about the U.S. economy that you   are  about to read are not talked about much by the mainstream media.  They  would  rather be “positive” and “upbeat” about the direction  that things  are  headed.

But lying to the American people is not going to help  them.  If  you are speeding in a car toward a 500 foot cliff, you  don’t need  someone to  cheer you on. Instead, you need someone to  slam on the  brakes.

The cold, hard reality of the matter is that the U.S.   economy  is in far worse shape than it was four or five years   ago.

We have never come close to recovering from the last   recession  and another one will be here soon.

The following are 25 horrible statistics about the  U.S.   economy that Barack Obama does not want you to  know….

#1 The percentage of Americans that own homes is   dropping  rapidly. According to Gallup, the current level of  homeownership  in the United  States is the lowest that Gallup has  ever  measured.

#2 Home prices in the U.S. continue to fall like a rock   as  well. They have declined for six months in a row and are now down  a  total of 35  percent from the peak of the housing bubble. The last  time  that home prices in  the United States were this low was back  in  2002.

#3 Last year, an astounding 53 percent of all U.S.   college  graduates under the age of 25 were either unemployed  or   underemployed.

#4 Back in 2007, about 10 percent of all unemployed   Americans  had been out of work for 52 weeks or longer. Today, that  number  is above 30  percent.

#5 When Barack Obama first became president, the number of “long-term unemployed workers” in the United States was 2.6 million.  Today,  it  is 5.3 million.


Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: "If I wanted America to fail" I WOULD RE-ELECT


#6 The average duration of unemployment in the United   States  is about three times as long as it was back in the year   2000.

#7 Despite what the mainstream media would have us to   believe,  the truth is that the percentage of working age Americans  that  are employed is  not increasing. Back in March 2010, 58.5  percent of all  working age Americans  were employed. In March 2011,  58.5 percent of all  working age Americans were  employed. In March  2012, 58.5 percent of all  working age Americans were  employed. So  how can Barack Obama and the  mainstream media claim that the   employment situation in the United States  is getting better? The  employment rate  is still essentially exactly where  it was when the  last recession supposedly  ended.

#8 Back in 1950, more than 80 percent of all men in the   United  States had jobs. Today, less than 65 percent of all men in  the  United States  have jobs.

#9 In 1962, 28 percent of all jobs in America were    manufacturing jobs. In 2011, only 9 percent of all jobs in America  were   manufacturing jobs.

#10 In some areas of Detroit, Michigan you can buy a   three  bedroom home for just $500.

#11 According to one recent survey, approximately  one-third  of  all Americans are not paying their bills on time at  this  point.

#12 Since Barack Obama entered the White House, the  price  of  gasoline has risen by more than 100 percent.

#13 The student loan debt bubble continues to expand at  a  very  frightening pace. Recently it was announced that total  student loan  debt in the  United States has passed the one trillion  dollar  mark.

#14 Incredibly, one out of every four jobs in the  United   States pays $10 an hour or less at this point.

#15 Household incomes all over   the  United States continue to fall. After adjusting for inflation,  median  household  income in America has declined by 7.8 percent since  December  2007.

#16 Over the past several decades, government dependence   has  risen to unprecedented heights in the United States. The following  is  how I  described the explosive growth of social welfare benefits  in one  recent  article….

Back in 1960, social welfare benefits made up  approximately  10  percent of all salaries and wages. In the year  2000, social welfare  benefits  made up approximately 21 percent of  all salaries and wages.  Today, social  welfare benefits make up  approximately 35 percent of all  salaries and  wages.

#17 In November 2008, 30.8 million Americans were on   food  stamps. Today, more than 46 millionAmericans are on food   stamps.

#18 Right now, more than 25 percent of all American   children  are on food stamps.

#19 According to the U.S. Census Bureau, today 49  percent  of  all Americans live in a home that receives some form of  benefits from  the  federal government.

#20 Over the next 75 years, Medicare is facing  unfunded   liabilities of more than 38 trillion dollars. That comes to  $328,404 for  each  and every household in the United  States.

#21 During the first quarter of 2012, U.S. public debt  rose  by  359.1 billion dollars. U.S. GDP only rose by 142.4  billion  dollars.

#22 At this point, the U.S. national debt is rising by   more  than 2 million dollars every single minute.

#23 The U.S. national debt has risen by more than 5   trillion  dollars since the day that Barack Obama first took office. In  a  little more than  3 years Obama has added more to the national debt  than  the first 41 presidents  combined.


Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: "If I wanted America to fail" I WOULD RE-ELECT


#24 The Federal Reserve bought up approximately 61  percent  of  all government debt issued by the U.S. Treasury  Department during   2011.

#25 The Federal Reserve continues to systematically   destroy  the value of the U.S. dollar. Since 1970, the U.S. dollar has  lost  more than 83  percent of its value.

But the horrible economic statistics only tell part of   the  story.

In communities all over America there is a feeling  that   something fundamental has changed. Businesses that have been  around for   generations are shutting their doors and there is a lot  of fear in the air.  The  following is a brief excerpt from a recent  interview with Richard  Yamarone, the  senior economist at Bloomberg  Brief….

You have to listen to what the small businesses are   telling  you and right now they are telling you, ‘Hey, I’m the head of  a  3rd or 4th  generation, 75 or 100 year old business, and I’ve got  to shut  the doors’ or ‘I’ve got to let people go. And if I’m hiring  anybody back, it’s  only on a  temporary basis.’

Sometimes they do this through a hiring firm so that  they  can  sidestep paying unemployment benefit insurance. So that’s  what’s  really going on  at the grassroots level of the economy. Very,  very,  grossly different from what  you’re seeing in some of these  numbers coming  out in earnings  releases.”

All over the country, millions of hard working Americans   are  desperately looking for work. They have been told that “the  recession  is over”, but they are still finding it incredibly difficult to  find anyone that  will hire  them. The following example is from a  recent CNN  article….

Joann Cotton, a 54-year-old Columbus, Mississippi,   resident,  was one of those faces of poverty we met on the tour.  Unemployed  for three  years, Joann has gone from making “$60,000 a  year to less than  $15,000  overnight.” Her husband is disabled and  dependent on medicines the  couple can no  longer afford. They rely on  food stamps, which, Joann says, “is depressing as  hell.”

Receiving government aid, however, has not been as   depressing  as her job search. Joann says she has applied for at least  300  jobs. Even though  she can barely afford gas, she drives to the  interviews  only to learn that the  employers want to hire younger  candidates at low  wages.

The experiences have taken a toll: “I’ve aged 10 years  in  the  three years that I’ve been looking for a job,” Joann told us. “I want  to get a  job so I can just relax and exhale … but I can’t.  After a while  you just give  up.”

Meanwhile, Barack Obama and his family continue to live   the  high life at the expense of the U.S. taxpayer.

Even many Democrats are starting to get very upset about   this.  The following is from a recent article by Paul Bedard….

Blue collar Democratic voters, stuck taking depressing “staycations” because they can’t afford gas and hotels, are resentful of   the  first family’s 17 lavish vacations around the world and don’t  want  their tax  dollars paying for the Obamas’ holidays, according to  a new  analysis of swing  voters.

It simply is not appropriate for the Obamas to be   spending  millions upon millions upon millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars  on  luxury  vacations when so many Americans are deeply  suffering.

But Barack Obama does not want you to know about any of   this  stuff.

He just wants you to buy his empty propaganda one more  time  so  that he can continue to occupy the White House for another  four   years.

Más en Univision.com: href="http://foro.univision.com/t5/WQBA-1140-AM/QUIEN-ES-OBAMA-YA-LLEGO-LA-RESPUESTA/td-p/443697174/...

Mensajes: 90,636
Registrado: ‎06-03-2009

Re: "If I wanted America to fail"

 Subject: San Antonio doctors' ad


The Democratic Party has produced a television ad purporting to show Rep Paul Ryan throwing grandma off the cliff, by opposing ObamaCare. 

A couple of San Antonio doctors have responded with an effective ad to counter this injustice. See the ad produced by Drs Jane Hughes and Kris Held 



If you like their ad, please forward widely.